Clinical Trials Logo

Adverse Drug Event clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Adverse Drug Event.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03857100 Completed - Adverse Drug Event Clinical Trials

Improving Wisely - Polypharmacy

Start date: January 4, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized controlled trial that uses an audit and feedback intervention to alert primary care physicians who are outliers in one or more metrics related to high risk prescribing of participants' outlier status. Primary care physicians will be randomized to the intervention or control arm, except in California, where all outliers will be notified. The investigators will evaluate the impact of the intervention on prescribing patterns.

NCT ID: NCT03808285 Completed - Adverse Drug Event Clinical Trials

Denosumab Related Osteonecrossi of the Jaw : : an Emergent and Potentially Complex Bone and Joint Infection

Start date: January 1, 2013
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of this study is to adescription of mandibular osteomylitis in patients having had a treatment by DENOSUMAB. Indeed, one of the adverse effect ot this molecule is to induce mandibular infection.

NCT ID: NCT03791580 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Congestive Heart Failure

Reducing High-Risk Geriatric Polypharmacy Via EHR Nudges: Pilot Phase

Start date: February 11, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Polypharmacy is common among older adults in the United States and is associated with harms such as adverse drug reactions and higher costs of care. This pilot-phase project is designed to test two electronic health record (EHR)-based behavioral economic nudges to help primary care clinicians reduce the rate of high-risk polypharmacy among their older adult patients.

NCT ID: NCT03725046 Completed - Adverse Drug Event Clinical Trials

Impact of an Optimized Communication on the Readmission for Adverse Drug Event

URGEIM
Start date: November 19, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Emergency departments (EDs) are a crucial element of health care systems as they constitute the interface between hospital and communities. The goals of the ED are to make an initial diagnosis and deliver urgent and critical care 24 hours per day and 365 days a year. Also, many Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) are not identified by emergency physicians. ADEs are injuries resulting from a drug related medical intervention. Their detection, documentation and reporting are essential for adequate medical care and knowledge of risk/benefit profiles of medication throughout their lifecycle. However, a number of studies indicate that in clinical practice the under-reporting of ADEs is a pervasive and widespread problem. The main reasons for under-reporting were difficulty in determining the cause of the ADE, lack of time, poor integration of ADE-reporting systems and uncertainty about reporting procedures. Successful treatment of ADEs depends on the ability of physicians to attribute ADEs to a medication. Some studies have reported that not only pharmacists but also pharmacy student were one of the best health care providers to establish medication history and detected ADEs. It has also been shown that a clinical pharmacist, within the emergency medical team, can improve the detection of ADE through drug expertise and reliable drug history. This approach has been adopted at Montpellier University Hospital since November 2011. During the initial diagnosis of the ADE, the revision of a drug treatment at risk cannot be carried out in emergency department by the emergency physician. Indeed, the latter intervenes punctually but he is not the patient's referring doctor. Guidance and follow-up of the patient throughout the care journey is the responsibility of the referring physician, sometimes accompanied by the pharmacist. It is therefore very important that a relevant information detected at the hospital can be passed on to the referring health professionals who will review and adapt the treatment. The city-hospital link is essential to guarantee the continuity and the consistence of the care process. When a patient is discharging with the emergency department, the outgoing mail often mentions only the reason for admission, and the information concerning the detection or suspicion of an ADE is not systematically stipulated. However, this information is essential to trigger a process of therapeutic revision (therapeutic modification, therapeutic education, referral to specialized consultations ...) that will prevent the recurrence of the ADE and therefore the readmission to emergency department. To date, the rate of readmission to emergency department after a first visit related to an ADE is between 3.6 and 18.7%. Our goal is to evaluate the impact at 6 months of a medical-pharmaceutical follow-up and the optimization of the city-hospital link following an admission at emergency department for ADE, on the readmission to emergency department for the same ADE. This is a single-center randomized, controlled, open-label, two-arm, parallel, "usual information transmission" or "optimized information transmission" study. The duration of a patient's follow-up is 6 months. Each patient with an occurring ADE detected during emergency department admission could be participating in the study. Specific management of the experimental group: Sending to the community referring physician by the emergency department an discharge report containing the reason for emergency consultations (report currently made as part of the treatment). Within 72 hours (working hours), the Emergency Clinical Pharmacist contacts the referring physician and the patient's community pharmacist to discuss how to manage the ADE. In parallel, a second report, summary of the ADE (ADE-report), is sent to them. The ADE-report, written and validated by the investigators (emergency physician and clinical pharmacist), includes the type of ADE, the suspected drug(s) and other recommendations: therapeutic modification, referral to specialized consultations (geriatrics ...) Control group: The emergency department sends to the referring doctor a letter to inform him about the reason of consultations in the emergency department (mail currently realized as part of the care process). Primary outcome measure: Percentage of patients who had at least one readmission for the same reason in the emergency department within 6 months of the initial exit. This information will be collected during a telephone call with the patient and the referring physician.

NCT ID: NCT03665402 Completed - Tuberculosis Clinical Trials

A Pharamcogenomic Study for Isoniazid According to NAT2 Polymorphism Status

Start date: May 13, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A clinical trial to investigate the appropriate dose of isoniazid according to NAT2 polymorphism status in Korean subjects

NCT ID: NCT03640884 Recruiting - Adverse Drug Event Clinical Trials

Post-marketing Safety Surveillance of Xueshuantong-Injection : a Registry Study

Start date: February 18, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

This registry aims to monitor the safety of Xueshuantong Injection and to identify the potential risk factors for the adverse drug reactions.

NCT ID: NCT03640273 Completed - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Prapchompoothaweep Remedy and Loratadine for Treatment in AR Patients

Start date: November 23, 2017
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

1. To compare the effectiveness of Prapchompoothaweep crude drug at 3,000 mg per day and Loratadine 10 mg per day for treatment in Allergic Rhinitis patients. (Clinical Trial Phase II) 2. To evaluate the safety and adverse effect of Prapchompoothaweep crude drug at 3,000 mg and Loratadine 10 mg for Allergic Rhinitis patients.

NCT ID: NCT03638726 Recruiting - Cataract Clinical Trials

Subconjunctival Atropine and Intracameral Epinephrine for Pupil Dilation in Phacoemulsification

Start date: September 28, 2018
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Mydriatic eye drops are routinely used before phacoemulsification but they are not free of drawbacks. Several alternatives were tried to overcome their limitations.

NCT ID: NCT03638375 Active, not recruiting - Adverse Drug Event Clinical Trials

TIL and Anti-PD1 in Metastatic Melanoma

ACTME
Start date: July 31, 2018
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The ACTME study is an investigator initiated, single center phase I/II clinical trial for patients with progressive unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma. The trial consists of both a phase I part to determine safety and feasibility and a phase II part to evaluate first clinical activity of IFN-alpha, nivolumab and TIL. The treatment with IFN-alpha will be added after the combination of TIL and nivolumab has proven to be safe.

NCT ID: NCT03544034 Withdrawn - Adverse Drug Event Clinical Trials

Partnering With Patients for Improving Medication Safety During Transitions of Care: Implications for Work System Design

Start date: December 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This project is to develop, implement, pilot evaluate, and disseminate a medication safety program (HomeTeam) that consolidates strategies to help patients by partnering with patients and their informal caregivers during transitions from hospital to home. Care transitions, especially from hospital to home, are high-risk periods for medication errors, and are frequently associated with serious adverse drug events (ADEs) and preventable readmissions. Older adults with multi-morbid conditions who have complex medication regimes are especially prone to these risks. Patients and family caregivers may experience a dramatic transition in roles and responsibilities immediately after hospital discharge. Patients and family caregivers are relatively passive recipients in their care and medication management in the hospital, but when patients arrive at home, patients have the primary responsibility for their care and medication use (with professional care providers switching to a 'supporting' function). Although this significant transition in the nature and intensity of patient work needs to be managed actively, often patients and family members are not adequately engaged and prepared in the hospital, and not effectively supported for safe medication use after hospital discharge. More specifically, patients and family members may not understand essential steps in the management of their condition, and have difficulty contacting appropriate health care practitioners for guidance. Although most organizations deploy multiple layers of interventions for improving care transitions, reducing postdischarge adverse drug events (ADEs), 30-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits, their impact to date has been small, and there remains significant and urgent need to fundamentally redesign the hospital-to-home care transition process. Investigators believe that one practical and potentially effective way for this 'much-needed' redesign is through engaging and supporting patients and families in safe medication use. Investigators' proposed program 'HomeTeam' will contain evidence-based tools and methods for engaging patients and shifting culture towards a truly patient-centered care for medication safety.