View clinical trials related to Acute Pain.
Filter by:MR-107A-02 is being studied to investigate its efficacy and safety for treatment of acute pain after herniorrhaphy.
MR-107A-02 is being studied to investigate its efficacy and safety for treatment of acute pain after bunionectomy.
Spinal surgery patients generally have chronic pain in the preoperative period and are exposed to widespread and severe acute pain postoperatively. In spinal surgery patients, providing postoperative analgesia is important not only for the patient's comfort but also for preventing the negative effects of pain on the systems, allowing early mobilization, reducing hospital stay and especially reducing chronic pain syndrome. Although ESP block is routinely used in spinal analgesia, the answer to the question of whether investigators should perform the block after putting the patient to sleep or before waking the patient after completing the surgery is not clear. Preference varies among anesthesiologists.YOU investigators propose a randomized double-blind study comparing patients who underwent ESP block before surgery (Group 1) with patients who underwent ESP block after surgery (Group 2).
The hypothesis of this study is that patients who undergo PENG block in before Total Hip Artroplasthy (THA) surgery with spinal anesthesia will have reduced postoperative pain scores, less need for opioid analgesics and earlier mobilisation.
Evaluate the content validity and comprehensibility of a caregiver observer-reported outcome assessment and clinician-reported assessments for acute pain in children aged 0 to <2 years. The primary objective of the Qualitative Protocol in the UH3 phase study is to establish or create reliable Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs) and endpoints that can assess acute pain during clinical trials of pain therapeutics specifically designed for infants and young children (0 - <2 years).
Appendicitis is a common condition in children 6-17 years of age, and the top reason for emergency surgery in Canada. Children with appendicitis can have very bad pain in their belly. Children often need pain medications given to them through a needle in their arm called an intravenous (IV). The most common IV pain medication is a type of opioid called morphine. We know that opioids work well to improve pain, but there are risks and side effects when taking them. There are non-opioid medications that doctors can give to patients, like ketorolac. Ketorolac helps decrease inflammation and pain and has fewer side effects when a patient takes it for a short period of time. Our past and present overuse of opioids, driven by an unproven assumption that opioids work best for pain, resulted in an Opioid Crisis and doctors are now looking for alternatives. To do this, we need to prove that there are other options to treat children's pain that are just as good as opioids, with less side effects. The goal of our study is to discover if school aged children who arrive at the emergency department with belly pain, improve just as much with ketorolac as they do with morphine. To answer this question, we will need a very large number of patients in a study that includes several hospitals across Canada. With a flip of a coin, each participant will either get a single dose of morphine or a single dose of ketorolac. To make sure that our pain assessment is impartial, no one will know which medicine the child received except the pharmacist who prepared the medicine.
Pilot single arm non-randomized trial to determine the feasibility and acceptability of: 1) a tailored music-assisted relaxation and imagery intervention; 2) biological sample collection; and 3) mobile device patient-reported outcome (MDPRO) collection in adults hospitalized for pancreatic surgery experiencing acute pain.
This randomized controlled study is to investigate the effectiveness of VR headsets in reducing postoperative pain intensity among patients after having undergone thoracic surgical procedures.
Rationale: Prescriptions of analgesics, especially opioids, have doubled in the Emergency department (ED) over the past decades in response to frequently reported undertreatment of pain in ED patients. Consequently, there is a shift towards a more restrained utilisation of opioids at the ED. However, there are still few (non-)pharmacological alternatives. Virtual Reality (VR) therapy is a relatively new and promising technique in non-pharmacologic pain reduction and anxiolysis and shows positive results on pain relief and pain. Objective: Primary objective is to investigate the effect of VR on patient-reported pain outcomes in the ED. Secondary objectives are to investigate the effect of VR on analgesics use, patient-reported outcomes, and process indicators and to identify barriers to implementation. Last, subanalyses will be performed to compare the effectiveness of two types of VR: VR based on distraction (VRD) and VR based on focussed attention (VRF). Study design: randomized controlled trial. Study population: Adults admitted to the ED with a NRS pain score of 4 (out of ten) or more and unacceptable pain. Intervention: There will be a control group receiving usual care and a intervention group that receives additional VR therapy. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study outcome is the difference in patient-reported NRS pain score.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Even minor breast surgery can cause significant postoperative pain (PP). PP can turn into chronic pain in 25-40% of cases. Inadequate PP control is associated with increased morbidity, delayed wound healing, prolonged hospital stay, increased opioid use and side effects, and high cost of care. Opioid use remains the mainstay of postoperative analgesia. Opioids, especially morphine, inhibit both cellular and humoral immune functions. This effect may be responsible for the high rates of local recurrence and/or metastasis after surgery. Additionally, studies have shown that perioperative opioid use is associated with social abuse. This demonstrates the importance of reducing perioperative opioid use. Currently, multimodal analgesia based on nerve block is being widely investigated and has shown encouraging clinical results. Numerous regional analgesic techniques have been investigated in breast cancer surgery, including intercostal nerve block, thoracic epidural anesthesia, and paravertebral block. Compared with general anesthesia alone, it reduces the postoperative pain score even after a single-shot injection for up to 72 hours, reduces opioid consumption, improves the quality of patient recovery, and suppresses the development or reduces the severity of chronic pain. Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is reported to be effective in perioperative pain management of breast cancer surgeries. The important problem of SAPB block is that it is insufficient to block the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves. Therefore, intravenous analgesia is required. Thoracic transversus muscle plane block (TTPB) is a recently described fascial plane block used to anesthetize the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves from T2-T6. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated for breast surgery and median sternotomy. In our study, we will provide postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing breast surgery by applying the serratus anterior block in combination with the transversus thoracis plane block. Since we avoid complicated analgesia methods such as paravertebral block, the risk of complications will be reduced. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of the combination of SAPB and TTPB with SAPB performed alone in breast cancer surgery.