View clinical trials related to Acute Lung Injury.
Filter by:Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition that causes high mortality (41% to 58%). Previous studies have reported that biomarkers can facilitate phenotypic diagnosis of ARDS, enabling precision treatment of ARDS. Although there were many studies that found some potential therapeutic targets for ARDS, no pharmacotherapies have been validated to treat ARDS. The development of biomarkers to predict the prognosis and monitor the response to treatment would be of interest for selecting patients for specific therapeutic trials. Many recent studies have shown that immune metabolic changes are involved in the pathogenesis of ARDS and may become a new therapeutic target for them. We aimed to identify a panel of immunometabolic and lipidomic biomarkers derived from blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) which may help differentiate the ARDS endotypes.
Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU. Neuromuscular electrostimulation can be an alternative form of muscle exercise that helps to gain strength in critically ill patients with COVID -19, due to the severe weakness that patients experience due to longer MV, analgesia and NMB duration. Thus, the general objective of evaluating the effects of an early rehabilitation protocol on the strength and functionality of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 variants and specifically compare the effectiveness of NMES associated with the functional rehabilitation protocol(FR). Also, describe demographics, clinical status, ICU therapies, mortality estimates and Hospital outcomes, of every patients admitted in ICU during the observation periods.
• Check the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the compound Modified isothymol against the SARS-CoV-2 agent in patients COVID-19.
Oxygen is the most commonly administered therapy in critical illness. Accumulating evidence suggests that patients often achieve supra-physiological levels of oxygenation in the critical care environment. Furthermore, hyperoxia related complications following cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction and stroke have also been reported. The underlying mechanisms of hyperoxia mediated injury remain poorly understood and there are currently no human in vivo studies exploring the relationship between hyperoxia and direct pulmonary injury and inflammation as well as distant organ injury. The current trial is a mechanistic study designed to evaluate the effects of prolonged administration of high-flow oxygen (hyperoxia) on pulmonary and systemic inflammation. The study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy versus matching placebo (synthetic medical air). We will also incorporate a model of acute lung injury induced by inhaled endotoxin (LPS) in healthy human volunteers. Healthy volunteers will undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 6 hours post-intervention to enable measurement of pulmonary and systemic markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and cellular injury.
This phase IIb study, LEONARDO is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled, parallel group study, to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Plerixafor in patients over 18 years of age, - with acute respiratory failure related to COVID-19 and - Recently admitted in ICU or equivalent structure (within 48 hours) for COVID-19 related respiratory failure - without invasive mechanical ventilation and - requiring oxygen support ≥ 5L/min to obtain a transcutaneous O2 saturation > 94% A total of 150 participants, will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either Plerixafor (n=100) or placebo (n=50) as a continuous IV infusion for 7 days (from D1 to D8) in addition to standard of care (e.g. glucocorticoids...). Safety data will be reviewed by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) during the study.
In ARDS patients, mechanical ventilation should minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. The mechanical power which is the energy per unit time released to the respiratory system according to the applied tidal volume, PEEP, respiratory rate, and flow should reflect the ventilator-induced lung injury
Treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) relies on invasive mechanical ventilation with supposedly protective settings (low tidal volume ventilation). Mortality of ARDS remains high in observational studies (40 to 50%). Approximately 30% of ARDS patients exhibit tidal hyperinflation despite low tidal volume ventilation, suggesting that personalization of tidal volume is required to improve ARDS prognostic. To date, reliable bedside tools to adjust tidal volume are lacking. Excessive tidal volume can be detected using computed tomography by quantification of tidal hyperinflation, but this technique is reserved to research studies and requires patient transport to imaging facility. Mechanical ventilation generates cardio-pulmonary interaction, whose magnitude is influenced by tidal volume and respiratory system characteristics. Pulse pressure variation is a bedside tool with potential to quantify cardio-pulmonary interactions. Increasing tidal volume will decrease right ventricular preload and increase right ventricular afterload, hence maximizing cardio-pulmonary interactions. The investigators hypothesize that pulse pressure variation might help to detect excessive tidal volume during a tidal volume challenge (i.e. stepwise increase in tidal volume)
With this research, we are aiming at finding out the effectiveness of prone positioning in this region population affected by moderate pneumonia due to covid 19 infection so that the hospital staff and doctors may be encouraged with facts and data to use such an easy maneuver to stabilize patient's oxygen saturation as we believe that prone positioning does have a protective effect against severe disease and has an effect on reducing mortality if patients are encouraged for prone positioning with proper technique and for suitable time duration as has been observed in the clinical practice in the covid wards. Therefore, we want to assess the effects of 8 hours per day prone positioning the patients with confirmed covid pneumonia admitted in the covid wards.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome of inflammatory lung injury characterized by increased pulmonary vascular permeability, loss of aerated lung tissue, severe hypoxemia and impaired compliance. Despite the advance in the critical care technology, the mortality of ARDS remains high in the last decades. Glucocorticoids have profound anti-inflammatory actions through the pleiotropic effects of the glucocorticoid receptor, which are considering a promising pharmacological therapy to mitigate the inflammatory lung injury and subsequent fibrosis in ARDS. Previous clinical trials have repeatedly tested the efficacy of glucocorticoid therapy in ARDS; however, the data about hard outcomes, such as mortality, are inconsistent between these studies. Investigators designed a 3x2 factorial trial of glucocorticoid therapy in ARDS to test the effects of glucocorticoid dosages (dose 0, dose 0.5 mg/kg, and dose 1 mg/kg of methylprednisolone equivalence) and durations (prolonged and short duration) on the treatment efficacy. In addition, investigators will measure the change of inflammatory biomarkers for post-hoc analysis to explore whether biomarkers could be used to guide patient selection and steroid tapering.
ASCEND researchers are partnering with families of children who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after a sudden failure of breathing named pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). ECMO is a life support technology that uses an artificial lung outside of the body to do the lung's work. ASCEND has two objectives. The first objective is to learn more about children's abilities and quality of life among ECMO-supported children in the year after they leave the pediatric intensive care unit. The second objective is to compare short and long-term patient outcomes in two groups of children: one group managed with a mechanical ventilation protocol that reserves the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) until protocol failure to another group supported on ECMO per usual care.