View clinical trials related to Abdominal Surgery.
Filter by:A postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) is the most common serious complication after Abdominal surgery under GA which lead to longer hospital stays and have deleterious outcomes on lung volumes, mucociliary clearance, accumulation of mucus, saliva and cough reflex. Chest physiotherapy for airway clearance which includes postural drainage, chest percussion, vibrations, Along with these, breathing exercises such ACBT and Blow bottle technique are recommended to clear secretion which aid in enhancing pulmonary function by effectively mobilizing and eliminating excess bronchial secretions. This study of randomized clinical trial will check the comparative effect of ACBT and Blow Bottle Technique in patients with abdominal surgeries under GA by taking a sample of 44 patients through non probability convenience sampling technique. Subject of both gender will be included between the age of 30 to 50 years who will undergoes with elective abdominal surgeries under GA (Cholecystectomy, Hysterectomy ,Appendectomy, Hemorrhoidectomy) and Laparoscopic /open. Elective surgeries under spinal anesthesia, emergency surgeries, cardiothoracic surgeries and hemodynamically unstable subjects will be excluded. 22 subjects will receive ACBT and other 22 subjects will receive Blow bottle technique for 20 minutes duration per session, two sessions per day for a period of 5 days. The status of airway clearance, oxygen saturation and lungs volumes will be measured pre and post intervention on day 1 and at the end of 5th day by using BCSS, Pulse oximeter and Spirometer.
Several risk factors for chronic postoperative pain have been identified. A series of studies have shown that administrating intraoperatively a high dose of Remifentanil is associated with an increased incidence of CPSP. These findings highlight a risk factor for CPSP that the anaesthetist can influence on, but they however remain limited to remifentanil. To this day, no study have attempted to evaluate the existence of such an association between the incidence of CPSP and the intraoperative administration of sufentanil doses. Improved knowledge of the long-term nociceptive impact of intraoperative sufentanil administration would enable better therapeutic adaptation according to each patient's risk. In the field of CPSP, non-major abdominal surgeries remain poorly studied. This is due to their lower risk of CPSP than other surgeries such as orthopaedic, mammary or thoracic surgery. Nevertheless, they constitute a large number of daily surgical procedures. The estimated incidence of CPSP in non-major abdominal surgery appears in several studies to be between 15 and 20% The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the intraoperative administration of sufentanil doses and the incidence of CPSP at 3 months in patients undergoing non-major scheduled abdominal surgery.
After abdominal surgery, most patients experience problems such as respiratory complications, surgical wound infection, cardiac problems, renal failure, delirium, and insomnia, along with surgical trauma and underlying comorbidities. Postoperative delirium (POD) is an adverse postoperative complication that can occur in patients of all ages, from children to the elderly. Effective non-pharmacological treatment approaches for delirium include using an orientation board, calendar, clock, ensuring hydration, improving sleep quality, therapeutic activities, providing companionship of family members, and building private rooms. This study will be conducted as a randomized controlled and experimental study to determine the effect of eye patch and music on sleep quality and delirium in patients followed after abdominal surgery in the surgical intensive care unit. It was planned to include a total of 34 patients who underwent abdominal surgery, 17 in the experimental group and 17 in the control group. During the data collection phase, the Patient Information Form, Richard-Campbell Sleep Scale, Nursing Delirium Screening Scale and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, will be used.
The goal of this randomized clinical cross-over trial is to compare power dissipation (Pd) during flow-controlled ventilation with either standard of low tidal volume ventilation or compliance guided individualization of ventilator settings. This study is performed in patients scheduled for open abdominal surgery and the primary and secondary outcome parameters are: - power dissipation [J/min] during ventilation calculated by integrating the hysteresis of the tracheal pressure-volume loop - applied mechanical power during ventilation calculated by published formulas [1] - oxygenation of the blood assessed by PaO2/FiO2 ratio - decarboxylation assessed by required respiratory minute volume to maintain normocapnia - comparison of respiratory variables in low tidal volume versus individualized ventilation Participants will randomly receive either low tidal volume (LTV) or individualized flow-controlled ventilation [2]. In the LTV group, the positive end-expiratory pressure will be set to 5 cmH2O and the peak pressure set to achieve a tidal volume of 7 ml/kg predicted body weight. In the individualized group positive end-expiratory and peak pressure will be titrated to achieve the highest compliance [2]. In both groups the flow will be set to achieve normocapnia (PaCO2 35-45 mmHg). After obtaining three consecutive measurements the ventilation strategy will be switched to the alternative regime in a cross-over design and again, three measurements recorded. The investigators hypothesize, that individualized ventilator settings are able to improve ventilation efficiency in terms of a lower required minute volume to maintain normocapnia and thus is able to reduce power dissipation during ventilation. Secondary endpoint will be a comparison of Pd to calculated mechanical power, as a currently accepted surrogate parameter for ventilation invasiveness [2] and also outcome predictor. Additionally, gas exchange parameters such as oxygenation and decarboxylation will be compared between low tidal volume and individualized ventilation.
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of using reflective blankets, which is a passive insulation product, on preventing UPH in patients scheduled for abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. It will also be evaluated whether the reflective blanket has an effect on the patients' thermal comfort and shivering levels. Inconsistent results have been reported in studies using reflective blankets. This inconsistency may be due to the fact that it was used at different stages of the perioperative process or that the body was not adequately isolated. In this study, we aimed to use the reflective blanket throughout the perioperative process and to isolate the patient's body as much as possible. Reflective blankets are inexpensive, practical to use and easy to store. With the positive results that can be obtained from this study, it can be used not only in operating rooms, but also in intensive care or other services where hypothermia is likely to occur. Within the scope of the study, a Reference group (warm air blower device), an Intervention group (reflective blanket) and a Control group (routine hospital procedure) will be established. The study was planned to be conducted with a total of 102 patients, with 34 patients in each group. In this study; patients' vital signs, coagulation tests, thermal comfort and shivering levels will be evaluated. Patients in the Reference and Intervention group will be warmed before the surgery (15 minutes), during the surgery, and until they are transferred from the post-anaesthetic care unit to the clinic. No heating process will be applied to the control group by the researcher. All patients transferred to the clinic will undergo the routine care procedure of the hospital.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate substantial equivalence in terms of safety to support an indication change related to the usage of Prevena Therapy for up to 14 days. The enrolled subject will undergo 1 of 4 surgery types and be evaluated for up to 90 days.
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPC) are common. It severely affects postoperative recovery, particularly in abdominal surgery. Several studies showed that intraoperative lung-protective ventilation with periodic lung recruitment maneuvers could reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. Other studies showed that intraoperative lung protective ventilation without periodic lung recruitment maneuvers could also reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the above two regimens on postoperative pulmonary complications.
The aim of the planned study is the development of surgical assistance functions on the basis of clinical routine data and the evaluation of the technical feasibility of an intraoperative demonstration and visualization of such assistance functions in visceral surgery. Furthermore, this trial aims to provide preliminary data on the clinical outcome of such assistance systems.
The study aims at investigate whether the oxygen partial pressure is improved in the prone position postoperative after abdominal surgery. Included are 50 adults operated with abdominal surgery. The Intervention is turning from supine to prone position and then back to supine position while measuring whether an improvement occurs in oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure, or not.
The study will prospectively compare the analgesic efficacy of TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine, plain bupivacaine, and placebo in patients who are scheduled for major abdominal surgery. The primary aim is to assess the duration of the local analgesia (determined by pinprick and cold) in all four quadrants. Comparing opioid consumption and pain scores is a secondary aim. All aims will be assessed over 72 hours or the duration of hospitalization if shorter.