View clinical trials related to Abdominal Pain.
Filter by:The purpose of the trial is to identify the "most simple non-inferior of three different methods", placebo, laparoscopic assisted transverse abdominal plane block (L-TAP) and ultrasound guided TAP block (US-TAP), using postoperative opioid consumption as a measure of efficacy in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colon surgery in an ERAS setting. Postoperative pain scores and length of stay (LOS) will also be measured. The simplicity of the three methods is ranked as: 1) placebo, 2) L-TAP and 3) US-TAP.
A study of patients with abdominal pain being seen by physicians at an academic emergency department and by physicians who are based remotely (telehealth). Hypothesis: When a patient with abdominal pain is examined by a physician at the hospital versus a physician who is remote (i.e. not at the hospital), they will agree most of the time for the need of abdominal imaging for the patient within 12 hours of their examination.
This is a 3-year prospective study too identify the role of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with abdominal pain who are undergoing upper endoscopy. An endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) with secretin will be performed in children undergoing routine investigative EGD. The goal of this study is to identify the role of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients with abdominal pain who are undergoing upper endoscopy, who otherwise would be labelled as recurrent abdominal pain (RAP).
Ethosuximide and pentoxifylline in the treatment of abdominal pain related to irritable bowel syndrome
Background: Chronic Abdominal Pain (CAP) is the sixth most common cause of hospital admission from any cause in women and the tenth most common cause in men. In the UK, it has been estimated that chronic abdominal pain costs the economy in excess of £100 million per annum. The mechanism of CAP is poorly understood. Patients with acute exacerbation of their CAP have multiple hospital admissions, prolonged length of stay and utilise significant health care resources. These patients have undergone multiple investigations with negative results leading to frustration for both the patient and the clinician. Additional testing and investigations increases costs, patient morbidity and comes with added risks. Patients are discharged once the flare up settles. The investigators have shown that treating patients with steroid injection followed by pulsed radio frequency treatment six months later can reduce the length of stay, repeat hospital admission, improve mood and provide durable pain relief in patients with CAP. The steroid is injected into a specific plane in the abdominal wall and is called abdominal plane block (APB). The investigators currently offer ABP treatment as a standard treatment in the management of patients with CAP. Aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Abdominal Plane Block (APB) treatment in reducing hospital readmission over 12 months in patients admitted with exacerbation of CAP Methods: The proposed study is a prospective, observational pilot study that will be conducted at Leicester General Hospital over 36 months. After providing written consent, adult patients admitted to the hospital with acute exacerbation of CAP will receive two sequential APB treatments (steroid injection followed by pulsed radio frequency treatment) six month apart. If the first treatment with steroid does not provide any benefit, the participants will receive a rescue treatment (trigger point injection with steroids). Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires on pain scores, mood and quality of life. Length of hospital stay, number of hospital re-admission following APB treatment as well as any complication from the APB treatment will be recorded. Participation in the study will end at 12 months following the first APB treatment on completion of relevant questionnaires.
To conduct a pilot study to evaluate the effects of new GES programming settings on abdominal pain in patients with gastroparesis and existing GES devices, whose abdominal pain has so far been refractory to drugs and/or devices.
colonoscopy has been a preferred modality for colorectal screening which efficiently reduce in morbidity and mortality of the disaese. Although colonoscopy is a safe procedure, some patients may be suffered from major and minor complications. Abdominal discomfort (approximately 30%) usually persisted for 2 days after colonoscopy. These unsatisfactory experiences might affect the patients' willingness to return for a repeat colonoscopy, which the loss of adherence eventually reduce the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Furthermore, during colonoscopy preparation, the patients are required to take large volume Polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage (PEG-EL) solution for bowel preparation which possibly lead to unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms likewise. Prokinetic agents are a class of drugs that promoted gastrointestinal motility and, thereby, decrease transit time. This stimulatory effect was considered clinically relevant to the management of disorders characterized by impaired motility, such as gastro-esophageal reflux, gastroparesis, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and colonic inertia. Prokinetic agents have various mechanism such as Cholinergic agonists, Dopamine antagonists (i.e.Domperidone, Metoclopramide), Serotonergic agonists (i.e. Cisapride, Prucalopride,Mosapride). Interestingly, these drugs have been used to minimize the unpleasant abdominal symptoms from colonoscopy. The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of a prokinetic agent in alleviating abdominal discomfort during the period of colonoscopy preparation and aftercolonoscopy consecutively.
Elderly patients residing in nursing homes are particularly at risk of experiencing urgent medical problems needing admission to the Emergency Department (ED). This circumstance contributes to ED overcrowding, increases the risk of ward admission of elderly patients, and puts them at an even higher risk of hospitalization-related adverse events. The study hypothesis is that a complex intervention, delivered directly in nursing homes by hospital physicians in case of urgent medical problems, would contribute to reduce hospitalization of older nursing home residents. The intervention consists in a hospital-based "multidisciplinary mobile unit" (MMU), composed of a hospital specialist and a resident in emergency-urgency medicine who are coordinated by a senior physician serving as "flow manager". The team is active on work days, 8 am to 6 pm, and is activated by general practitioners of nursing homes, in case of urgent medical needs of one of the residents. The activation is made by a phone call to the "flow manager", who triages the clinical needs of the case. The output of the phone consultation may include therapeutic advice provided by phone, immediate on-site visit by the MMU team (specialist and resident), scheduled visit by the MMU team, or direct admission to the hospital unit where MMU is based, avoiding ED visits. The MMU team is provided with a portable ultrasound system, an essential set of drugs and medical devices useful in a urgency setting (central venous lines, nasogastric tubes, rectal tubes, bladder catheters). During on-site visits, the MMU team performs diagnosis, stabilization and therapeutic advice, with the mission of avoiding ED visits and hospital admissions whenever possible. The MMU intervention is already active in two nursing homes, since December 2018. The aim of this prospective, pragmatic, multicenter, quasi-experimental study (sequential design with two cohorts) is to test the effects of the implementation of the MMU care model in terms of reduction of unplanned hospitalization rates (primary outcomes), mortality, health service use and costs (secondary outcomes). Two nursing homes (i.e., the ones who already benefit from the intervention) will serve as study group, and two nursing homes with similar geographical location will serve as control group. All residents of the participating nursing homes will be eligible for study inclusion. The study will last for 18 months, and a number of 338 residents is planned for inclusion.
The purpose of this study is to perform a first in man study with VCR stimulation of the belly and back for patients with chronic pain conditions including pelvic pain, functional abdominal pain, or low back pain. This study will also examine VCR stimulation of the temporal region for patients with migraine with or without aura. Additional goals of the study will be to determine the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of VCR stimulation for the treatment of these pain conditions.
The project investigates the situation of patients with chronic pelvic and chronic belly pain before and after our group therapy.