View clinical trials related to Stress Disorders, Traumatic.
Filter by:This pilot randomized clinical trial will randomize 60 participants 1:1 to either enhanced usual care or to adapted CETA, a counseling intervention for HIV care engagement plus depression, anxiety, PTSD, and/or substance use.
This will be a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole + sertraline combination treatment in adult subjects with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), 90% report lifetime trauma exposure and 33% meet criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The co-occurrence of OUD and PTSD is associated with worse mental health and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) outcomes relative to either diagnosis alone. Prolonged exposure therapy (PET) is an efficacious cognitive-behavioral treatment for reducing PTSD severity. Although preliminary findings indicate that PET may reduce PTSD symptom severity among patients receiving treatment for concomitant OUD, it is unclear to what extent improvements were a function of PET versus the effects of OAT itself. Therefore, the question of whether OAT alone may attenuate PTSD symptoms in the absence of intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy remains unanswered. In this 12-week trial, we aim to investigate the contribution of PET above and beyond OAT alone for reducing PTSD symptoms among adults with concurrent PTSD and OUD. Participants will be randomized to one of three conditions: (a) OAT as usual, (b) OAT + PET, or (c) OAT + Enhanced PET (OAT+PET+). Those randomized to OAT as usual will continue to receive standard buprenorphine or methadone treatment from their current treatment provider and complete assessments of PTSD symptom severity, psychosocial functioning and drug use at intake and Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12. In addition to receiving OAT and completing monthly assessments, OAT+PET participants will receive PET consisting of 12 weekly, individual sessions with a trained therapist. Finally, OAT+PET+ participants will receive the procedures noted above for the OAT+PET group plus monetary incentives delivered contingent upon completion of PET sessions. Given the poor PET adherence rates reported among patients with substance use disorders, the use of incentives will ensure that we evaluate PET effects among patients who receive a sufficient dose of therapy. The proposed study design will permit us to disentangle the effects of PET from the effects of OAT alone while also including experimental conditions that reflect real-world practice. Taken together, this project will produce important new scientific and clinically-relevant information related to the mechanisms through which OAT and PET promote reductions in PTSD symptomatology in a highly vulnerable clinical population.
The primary objective with this study is to investigate the short-term efficacy (primary endpoint at week 3) of Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) provided soon after trauma. The secondary objective is to investigate the long-term efficacy (primary endpoint at week 7) of ICBT. 100 participants recently exposed to a potentially traumatic event will be randomised to either ICBT or assessment only.
The aim of the project is to evaluate the psychometric properties (e.g. validity, reliability) of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) - German version. The ITI is a structured clinical interview that corresponds to the ICD-11 criteria for diagnosing both posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). Eligible participants from psychiatric inpatient and outpatient facilities in Switzerland who have provided informed will complete various self-report measures about trauma-related mental health complaints. In addition, the ITI will be conducted by a trained clinician. Lastly, information from the medical chart will be further used for scientific purpose. The overall assessment will take approximately 1-2 hours to complete.
25 parental couples, with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality, had psychiatric evaluation for eligibility before TToP and after one year from the procedure. Women and unborn's fathers were also subjected to different psychometric questionnaires (HAM-D, HAM-A, BDI-II, PCL-5, IPDS, CTQ, CD-RISC-10).
The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness on PTSD symptoms of the addition of a Facebook group to an online yoga intervention for women following a stillbirth.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that can develop after a traumatic life experience that severely reduces quality of life. This multi-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 3 study will assess the efficacy and safety of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy compared to psychotherapy with placebo in participants diagnosed with at least moderate PTSD. The study will be conducted in up to N ≈ 100 participants. Participants will be randomized to receive a flexible dose of 80 or 120 mg MDMA or placebo, followed by a supplemental half-dose of 40 or 60 mg MDMA or placebo, unless contraindicated, with manualized psychotherapy in three monthly Experimental Sessions. This ~12-week Treatment Period will be preceded by three Preparatory Sessions with the participant and therapists. During the Treatment Period, each Experimental Session will be followed by three Integrative Sessions of non-drug psychotherapy.
This study investigates the utility of Goal Management Training (GMT) in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), in order to determine if this treatment is effective in improving cognitive function in patients with frontal-temporally mediated brain dysfunction. Specifically, the primary aim of this study is to examine whether a standardized 9-week program of GMT results in durable improvements in cognitive functioning relative to a wait-list control group. A secondary aim will be to determine whether participation in the GMT group is associated with long-term functional improvements. It is hypothesized that at post-treatment, participants with PTSD assigned to the GMT groups will show greater improvement in neuropsychological test performance and greater functional improvement compared to those in the wait-list group; these gains are expected to be maintained at 3 month follow-up.
Every day, a significant number of children and young people in Norway experience violence, abuse, or other potentially traumatizing events. These children are at risk of developing serious health problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, behavioral problems, and drug dependency. Moreover, when left unaddressed, trauma experiences in childhood can have long-term implications for work- and educational participation as well as later subjection to violence. Provision of accessible and situationally adaptable treatments can therefore have great benefits for children, families, and communities at large. In this project, the investigators will introduce the method of Stepped-Care Trauma-Focused Behavioral Cognitive Therapy (SC-TF-CBT) in a selection of 15 municipalities across Norway. SC-TF-CBT is a parent-led - therapist-assisted low-threshold method aimed at treating children exposed to abuse, sexual assault, or other trauma and who are at risk of developing more severe trauma-related difficulties (Salloum, et al. 2014). This is the first test of the method outside the US. The project's main aim is therefore to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of the treatment in a Norwegian context through a pre-post design. The following questions are to be explored: 1. How does the SC-TF-CBT model fit the Norwegian health care culture and service system? 2. When testing Stepped-Care in a Norwegian context, the model is set to involve both the municipal and specialist service levels. Severe cases will be stepped up/transferred to the specialist level for TF-CBT treatment. How do these transitions work for the participating families, and what are the experiences and perspectives of practitioners and service-leaders regarding coordination and collaboration between service levels? 3. Do the children, parents, and therapists like working with the method? 4. Do recipients of the treatment (children and parents) report symptom improvement? 5. Which children and parents seem to benefit the most from the method, and who do not?