View clinical trials related to Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic.
Filter by:Given the limited effectiveness of current treatments and the burden PTSD places on Veterans, civilians and clinicians, this research aims to compare the effects of a standardized, traditional, holistic yoga intervention (postures, breathing, deep muscle contraction and relaxation practices) with a wellness program (wellness topics and physical activity) on PTSD symptoms.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) robustly predicts anger and aggression, and U.S. Iraq/Afghanistan-era combat Veterans report that treatment for anger and aggression is among their top priorities. PTSD-related anger and aggression are associated with profound functional impairments, yet to date there are no empirically-supported treatments for Veterans with PTSD and aggression. Effective group treatment programs could improve functioning and facilitate community reintegration for these Veterans. Given that anger impedes progress in treatment of PTSD symptoms, group anger treatment could also improve Veterans' capacity to benefit from individually-administered empirically-supported therapy for PTSD such as prolonged exposure or cognitive processing therapy.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate if the drug prazosin: - will decrease alcohol use in active duty members of the military who served in Iraq and/or Afghanistan and - determine if presence or absence of posttraumatic stress disorder affects treatment.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a preventative low-dose of Haloperidol to prevent delirium in patients undergoing a esophagectomy, pneumonectomy or thoracotomy. Delirium is state of severe confusion and some symptoms include: - Cannot think clearly - Have trouble paying attention - Have a hard time understanding what is going on around them - May see or hear things that are not there. These things seem very real to them.
Patients with PTSD, and frequent nightmares, and mild-moderate suicidal ideation, who are already taking a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) or Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor (SNRI) will be randomized to either prazosin or placebo. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving prazosin will have a greater reduction in suicidal ideation.
This is a randomized control trial with an anticipated 36 participants diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and comorbid alcohol dependence. Participants will be randomized to receive either progesterone (200 mg. bid) or placebo in identical looking capsules for three days. One goal of this research study is to test if progesterone is more effective than placebo in reducing craving after exposure to trauma cues and alcohol cues in a laboratory paradigm among men and women with AD and PTSD. We hypothesize that progesterone in comparison to placebo will significantly reduce craving for alcohol in response to trauma cues alone and in combination with alcohol cues in individuals with AD and PTSD. A second goal is to examine if there are gender differences in progesterone effects on stress and alcohol cue-induced craving. We hypothesize that the effects of progesterone on stress and craving will be stronger in women than in men. Participants will be recruited primarily through advertisement, but also through the clinical facilities at the VA and from other collaborators.
The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare group and individual CPT-C for the treatment of PTSD in OIF/OEF military personnel.
In the aftermath of natural disasters, e.g., flood disasters, there is a great need for humanitarian assistance in the domain of psychological support. This is particularly true in post-conflict settings because people have suffered severely from multiple traumatic events and situations during their lives. The Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET) is a short-term, culturally sensitive treatment approach that aims to reduce Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms. The investigators want to provide evidence, that NET is an effective and efficient module to assist people in the aftermath of natural disasters using the example of the recent flood disaster in Burundi. In addition the investigators aim to explore, how traumatic incidences and maltreatment during childhood may influence treatment outcomes.
For individuals suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the emotional numbing and isolation that are a core aspect of their suffering and consistently impedes remediation often remains after first-line treatments are administered. Few interventions have proven successful for enhancing the empathy and social connectedness that will ultimately allow patients to flourish, and the search for target therapies is made more difficult by the fact that very little is known about the underlying physiology of emotional numbing and social isolation. The proposed study is designed to (1) investigate the hormonal, neural and immunological biomarkers related to emotional numbing, and (2) test whether cognitively-based compassion training (CBCT), an intervention designed and proven to enhance empathy, will reduce emotional numbing and increase empathy and social connectedness in veterans. To this end, thirty medically healthy males diagnosed with PTSD who continue to report emotional numbing symptoms after prolonged exposure therapy will receive 8 weeks of training in CBCT. Prior to, and again after the training, the investigators will assess patients' levels of oxytocin, inflammation, and self-reported emotional numbing and social connectedness. The investigators will also assess their neural response during a video task that assesses their ability to accurately read others' emotions. The investigators hypothesize that oxytocin, neural activity, and inflammation will predict social numbing, isolation, and empathy, and also that CBCT will positively impact the social outcomes that will pave the way toward health and well-being.
Objectives: The primary objective is to test whether right prefrontal cortex low frequency 1 Hz rTMS versus right prefrontal high frequency 10 Hz rTMS provides a significantly greater improvement in function as measured by IPF score and PTSD symptoms as measured with CAPS score. The secondary objectives include: one, testing which treatment provides a significantly greater improvement in depressive symptoms as measured by change in QIDS score; two, testing whether depression impacts effectiveness of 1 Hz versus 10 Hz rTMS for PTSD symptoms; three, testing which treatment is better tolerated as measured by participant drop out and side effect profiles. Research Design: Randomized single-blind (raters) prospective clinical trial testing the effectiveness 1 Hz rTMS versus 10 Hz rTMS in veterans with PTSD. Methodology: Veterans 18-50 years of age suffering from PTSD with and without depressive symptoms will be recruited from the community as well as mental health clinics at James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital. Plan to enroll 50 to have an evaluable sample of approximately 20 in each group. Participants will be consented and undergo screening for safety and appropriateness to be in the trial. Those deemed eligible will be evaluated with clinical measures of function, PTSD, depression, pain, and neurobehavioral symptoms. Participants will be randomized in equal proportion (stratified by significant depression defined as MADRS greater than 19) to one of two active treatments: right prefrontal 1 Hz rTMS versus right prefrontal 10 Hz rTMS. Participants will undergo assessment for safety prior to each treatment. The treatments will be performed 5 days a week for 6 weeks with a 3-week taper consisting of 3 days per week, 2 days per week, and 1 day per week. Clinical evaluations will be performed at baseline, after every five treatments, at the end of treatment, and at 1 and 3 months post treatment. CAPS and IPF scores will be used to determine if there is a significant difference between 1 Hz and 10 Hz right prefrontal rTMS for PTSD symptoms and function respectively. The QIDS scores will be used to test for a significant difference in change in depressive symptoms for both the participants with significant depressive symptoms and the entire group. The number of dropouts (related specifically to side effects and all cause) will be used along with side effect profiles to test for differences in tolerability of the two treatments.