View clinical trials related to STEMI.
Filter by:The overall objective of the Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic Acid/Ezetimibe, an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen in Acute Coronary Syndrome ACS (CLEAR ACS) study is to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bempedoic acid/ezetimibe (BA/E) in a contemporary and real-world population, enriched for older adults, women, and underrepresented racial/ethnic groups, of adults with a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event independent of use of statin therapy before the ACS event.
To explore the protective effect of prostaglandin sodium on coronary microcirculation function and ventricular remodeling after reperfusion treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
The primary objective of the PERI-STEMI trial is to assess whether sacubitril-valsartan is more effective in preventing adverse LV remodeling for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than enalapril.
Aim of the work is to evaluate the use CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting no-reflow phenomenon and its impact on short term primary percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes (in-hospital mortality) and long term (6 months) incidence of MACE ( major adverse cardiac event ) in patients with ST segment elevation Myocardial infarction who underwent primary primary percutaneous coronary intervention
To examine the efficacy of chewing Ticagrelor versus Prasugrel in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients on platelet reactivity.
Prospective, multi-center, registry designed to enrol up to 2,000 patients in up to 35 International centers. All patients will receive a BioMatrix AlphaTM stent as per clinical practice and will be followed for 2 years for data collection. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) results at 9 months will be compared to the results obtained from the BioMatrix FlexTM arm of the LEADERS trial.
In patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) the treatment goal is revascularization of the occluded artery with the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a large subset of patients with STEMI who also have significant disease in arteries other than the site of occlusion, and away from the culprit artery. It is estimated that up to 50% have disease of more than 50% in the non-culprit arteries. The evidence on how to treat those patients with multi vessel disease is conflicting. Earlier large-scale studies and registries have suggested early and complete revascularization is of no benefit or even harmful. More recent studies have showed the opposite of that. The CVLPRIT study showed that early complete revascularization or preventive PCI reduced primary endpoint of a composite of all cause mortality, myocardial infarction and need for repeat revascularization. The benefit was mainly due to reduced repeat revascularization in the more intensive intervention group. The PRAMI study showed very similar results as well. The use of Fractional flow Reserve (FFR) in deciding complete revascularization has also showed conflicting results so far. A previous trial showed that FFR guided intervention post STEMI increased MACE. This was conflicted with more recent study, which showed FFR guided complete revascularization improved outcome when compared with more conservative treatment of ischaemia driven intervention. In this study, the investigators are going to assess the issue of staged revascularization guided by FFR or by angiogram, compared to the standard treatment of ischaemia driven revascularization
This is a retrospective, randomized, parallel, open-labeled, controlled study to find out whether STEMI patients undergoing emergency PCI can benefit from intensive atorvastatin treatment compared with routine treatment.