View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.
Filter by:The effect of biphasic positive airway pressure (Bi-PAP) at individualized pressures on the postoperative pulmonary recovery of morbidly obese patients (MOP) undergoing open bariatric surgery (OBS) and possible placebo device-related effects (sham-Bi-PAP) were investigated.
More and more people are surviving after receiving life support for respiratory failure in the intensive care unit, but these patients often experience problems with depression and physical functioning that lead to reduced quality of life. There is a lack of treatment for these patients, with past research suggesting that treatment may be more successful if mental and physical health are addressed at the same time. This research evaluates whether a therapy delivered via telephone and home visits, combining treatment for depression and physical rehabilitation, is feasible and might help patients recover.
This is a randomized, blinded trial comparing the order of drug administration for rapid sequence intubation in the Emergency Department.
There appears to be considerable variability in the approach physicians use to manage arterial carbon dioxide tensions, in patients in the early phases [first 48 hours] of ARDS (Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and). A number of specific concerns exist, particularly the use of greater than needed inspired oxygen concentrations (potentially in 40% patients), and the proportion of hypocapnic patients in our cohort.
To evaluate the impact of enteral nutrition on microaspiration of gastric content and pharyngeal secretions
Daily interruption of sedation is one of the modalities which is known to enhance early weaning and separation from mechanical ventilation . Daily sedation interruption is also known to help decreasing incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia. The new modality is no sedation.
Chronic respiratory insufficiency and COPD are the third leading cause of death worldwide. Patients decompensate at various stages of their disease and exhibit acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (ACRF), a frequent cause of ICU hospitalization for hypercapnic acute respiratory failure (ARF). Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the first line ventilatory treatment for hypercapnic ARF. It is applied intermittently, separated by periods of spontaneous breathing (SB) with standard oxygen (O2). Standard O2 has drawbacks that limit the benefit of intermittent NIV in hypercapnic ARF: limited gas flow which is well below the patient's inspiratory flow rate, limited capacity and efficiency of oxygenation with non-controlled FiO2 (risk of excessive oxygen and induced hypercapnia), and cold and dry gas leading to discomfort and under-humidification of the airways and tracheobronchial secretions. Benefits in terms of work of breathing and CO2 removal resulting from PEEP and pressure support applied during NIV periods could be rapidly lost during standard O2. Recently, use of high-flow heated and humidified nasal oxygen therapy (HFHO) has gained enthusiasm among intensivists to manage ARF. HFHO delivers high flows (up to 60L/min, that generate moderate PEEP) of heated and humidified oxygen at a controlled and adjustable FiO2 (21 to 100%) that rapidly improve respiratory distress symptoms, oxygenation, respiratory comfort and outcome of patients with hypoxemic ARF. These unique features of HFHO could overcome some of the drawbacks of standard O2 during SB periods in hypercapnic ARF. Indeed, PEEP effect, washout of nasopharyngeal dead-space limiting CO2 re-breathing and inspired gas conditioning preserving adequate mucosal function and secretion removal, could potentially contribute to decrease airways resistance, intrinsic PEEP and work of breathing, while improving patient comfort. Investigators aim to determine if the use of HFHO, as compared to standard O2, increases the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) and alive at day 28 in patients with hypercapnic ARF admitted in an ICU, an intermediate care, or a respiratory care unit, and requiring NIV.
Over the last two decades, the number of patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) admitted to the ICU increased and their mortality has dropped sharply. Patients with HMs increasingly require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for life-threatening events related to the malignancy and/or treatments, with immunosuppression being a major contributor. Whether the increase in ICU admissions is related to increased referrals by hematologists and/or to increased admissions by intensivists is unknown. The criteria used for ICU referral and admission decisions have not been extensively evaluated. Finally, the links between admission policies and treatment-limitation decisions are unclear, but ICUs with broad admission policies may change the treatment goals based on the response to several days of full-code management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a systematic evaluation by an intensivist of HMs patients presenting with acute respiratory and/or hemodynamic failure.
The aim of the present study; To compare the effects of respiratory support options available for NIMV at the emergency department; i.e. AVAPS and ST/T modes, on the patient's pCO2 values, additional treatment need (another non-invasive ventilation method or endotracheal intubation) and the duration of stay in hospital.
Non-invasive respiratory support has been emerging in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants to minimise the risk of lung injury. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) provides a method of augmenting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by delivering ventilator breaths via nasal prongs.It may increase tidal volume, improve gas exchange and reduce work of breathing. However, NIPPV may associate with patient-ventilator asynchrony that can cause poor tolerance and risk of intubation. It may also in increased risk of pneumothorax and bowel perforation because of increase in intrathoracic pressure. On the other hand, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a newer mode of ventilation, which has the potential to overcome these challenges. It uses the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) as a signal to synchronise the mechanical ventilatory breaths and deliver an inspiratory pressure based on this electrical activity. Comparing NI-NAVA and NIPPV in preterm infants, has shown that NI-NAVA improved the synchronization between patient and ventilator and decreased diaphragm work of breathing . There is lack of data on the use of NI-NAVA in neonates post extubation in the literature. To date, no study has focused on short-term impacts. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the need of additional ventilatory support post extubation of NI-NAVA and NIPPV and also the risk of developing adverse outcomes. Aim: The aim is to compare NI-NAVA & NIPPV in terms of extubation failure in infants< 32 weeks gestation. Hypothesis: Investigators hypothesized that infants born prematurely < 32 weeks gestation who extubated to NI-NAVA have a lower risk of extubation failure and need of additional ventilatory support.