View clinical trials related to Renal Insufficiency.
Filter by:This is a Phase I, open-label, single dose, sequential group study to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of pretomanid in the following groups of subjects: 1) subjects with severe renal impairment including those with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) not needing dialysis, and subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment, designated as Groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively; and 2) subjects with normal renal function matched to the above renal impairment groups, designated as Groups 1A, 1B, and 1C, respectively. The study will be conducted following a reduced Pharmacokinetic (PK) study design in Part A and Part B. Part A will enroll subjects from Group 1A (i.e., 6 healthy matched controls) and Group 2 (i.e., 6 subjects with severe renal impairment and ESRD, not on dialysis). A decision will be made after the PK of pretomanid and safety of subjects enrolled in Part A have been reviewed. If Part A demonstrated different pretomanid exposures at least a 50-100% increase in Area under the Curve (AUC) in Group 2 (severe renal impairments and ESRD, not on dialysis) relative to the exposures in Group 1A (matched subjects with normal renal function), then the reduced PK study will extend to the full PK study to enroll subjects into Part B (i.e., to investigate mild, and moderate renal impairment) and all enrollment will be initiated concurrently in Part B groups (1B, 1C, 3 and 4). If no difference in PK and safety is observed in Part A, then no further study (Part B) is recommended The approximate patient involvement will be 3 months. The primary objective is to evaluate the PK profiles of pretomanid in plasma and urine after a single oral dose of 200 mg in subjects with renal impairment compared to matched healthy controls.
The purpose of this study is to investigate BMS-986165 in participants with different levels of kidney function.
Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), a hepatotropic RNA virus, is often chronic, and causes liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. The virus is transmitted through parenteral exposure. This infection is particularly common in those on maintenance hemodialysis. Sofosbuvir, an inhibitor of HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, forms the backbone of DAA-based anti-HCV treatment regimens. In pre-clinical pharmacokinetic studies, administration of the usual 400 mg daily dose to in presence of advanced kidney failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of <30 ml/min) showed that serum levels of the sofosbuvir and GS-331007, the primary metabolite of sofosbuvir, were elevated by several folds. Hence, sofosbuvir is not approved for use in people on maintenance hemodialysis. The newer DAAs (e.g. grazoprevir/elbasvir combination), which have been approved for use in people with eGFR <30 ml/min, are very costly and are not available in Asian countries including India. Hence, as a rescue measures, several physicians, including our group, have tried half-daily dose (i.e, 200 mg daily or 400mg on alternate days) of sofosbuvir and 60 mg daclatasvir in dialysis-dependent people, with good results in terms of both safety and efficacy. In fact, the use of this empirical 200 mg daily dose schedule has become common in clinical practice. However, this use is not based on any pharmacokinetic data. Hence, it is proposed to study the pharmacokinetics of low-dose (200 mg daily or 400 mg alternate day) of sofosbuvir and GS-331007 metabolite in people with eGFR <30/min and active HCV infection.
The study will determine the efficacy of twice weekly hemodialysis in patients with residual kidney function.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of MK-2060 after intravenous (IV) administration of single and multiple doses in older adult participants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD).
Firstly, this study aims to understand how cardiac fibrosis mediated by inflammatory microvascular disease evolves during advanced chronic kidney disease and end stage renal failure and importantly how this changes with commencement on renal replacement therapy (haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) using sequential cardiac MRI imaging. This method of imaging is non-invasive, provides significantly more data than echocardiography, is reproducible and accurate, has been validated in numerous studies and does not involve exposure to ionising radiation. Secondly, this study aims to examine the changes in monocyte subsets and biochemical profile in peripheral blood prior to, during and after commencement on renal replacement therapy. The investigators hypothesis would be that renal failure causes alteration in monocyte subset phenotype resulting in increased circulating inflammatory monocytes (human CD14high CD16high), initiating pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and thereby accelerating inflammatory cardiovascular disease and development of myocardial fibrosis.
The aim of the study is to assess if abnormal lipid levels in childhood could cause early damage of the inner layer of the vessels, the endothelium. Dysfunction of the endothelium is the first event in the development of atherosclerosis, is present at all stages of atherosclerosis and is potentially reversible in childhood. It has been suggested that dyslipidemia, via its detrimental effects on endothelium, could impair renal function. This study will assess the dysfunction of the kidneys in children with dyslipidemia.
Researchers are trying to determine which dialysis solution, low bicarbonate fluid (22 mmol/L) or high bicarbonate fluid (32 mmol/L), is better in subjects with acute kidney injury (acute kidney failure) and metabolic acidosis that are admitted to the intensive care unit and require continuous renal replacement therapy (also known as continuous dialysis).
The aim of this study is to determine the levels of alpha-defensin throughout the hemodialysis course compared to the levels at the end of a course of peritoneal dialysis, as a reflection of the inflammatory burden.
This study is being conducted in order to assess the need for dose adjustment for elafibranor in participants with renal impairment. Pharmacokinetic parameters of elafibranor and its active metabolite (GFT1007) will be compared in severe renal impaired participants (eGFR<15mL/mn/1.73m^2) versus healthy participants after a single oral administration of elafibranor 120 mg