View clinical trials related to Recurrence.
Filter by:There is substantial evidence linking inflammation to the initiation and perpetuation of AF. Although the precise mechanism by which inflammation contributes to the development of AF remains unclear, it has been proposed that inflammation may lead to "atrial myocarditis" with subsequent electrical and structural changes involving both atrial myocytes and extracellular matrix, leading finally to initiation and maintenance of AF. The high incidence of AF in post-operative cardiac surgeries, a state of intense inflammatory process, points out this association. Similarly, in non operative AF, inflammation appears to play a prominent role in both etiology and maintenance of AF. Indeed an increase of inflammatory markers to both paroxysmal and persistent AF was shown by numerous studies.
This randomized pilot phase II trial studies the effect of pembrolizumab with or without carboplatin and paclitaxel on immune response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer that has come back or stage IIIB-IV. Monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as carboplatin and paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving pembrolizumab together with carboplatin and paclitaxel may improve immune responses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
The main aim is to assess the impact of using 18F-fluciclovine (as a PET imaging radiotracer) on the clinical and treatment decision required for managing patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) who are being considered for salvage treatment with the intention of providing disease cure. Also, this study will consolidate the information regarding diagnostic performance of fluciclovine PET/CT in a large number of prospectively followed patients at several centres in the UK and assess the effect of PSA level on the likelihood of detecting cancer lesions by 18F-fluciclovine
This prospective pilot study is to enroll patients with clinically-defined infected wounds. Patients enrolled in the study will be followed for 16 weeks for wound closure (Phase A), and will then begin Phase B. 265 clinically diagnosed infected burn or chronic wound patients will be recruited for this study in Phase A. Based on the expectation that 89% of these wounds will heal within 16 weeks of enrollment, 234 of these patients will continue with the study for Phase B.
Study in 400 patients with bipolar disorder I or II, of relapse risk factors. The principal objective of this research is to test the predictive value of core vulnerability dimensions such as affective instability and emotional reactivity, measured by validated questionnaires (AIM and ALS) on recurrence of affective major episode (depressed, hypomanic or manic) during a 24 months prospective follow-up. In addition, several arguments suggest that inter-individual variability in the risk of relapse is influenced by genetic factors. In particular, the implication of such factors have been demonstrated in rapid cycling or antidepressants induced mania. However, this has never been tested in cohorts followed prospectively. Finally, the existence of neuropsychological deficits in bipolar disorder is well documented and their role in the risk of relapse is suspected. Yet the nature of these deficits, their origin and evolutionary course remain poorly investigated. In summary, the secondary objectives of this research are the study of the influence of these other clinical, neuropsychological and genetic factors on the risk of relapse. • Scientific rationale The dimensions of affective instability and emotional reactivity, are considered core psychological and temperamental vulnerability dimensions to bipolar disorder. Differences in levels of instability and reactivity may account for the inter-individual variability observed in bipolar disorder in terms of risk of relapse. These dimensions are measured using validated questionnaires (Affective Instability Measure (AIM) and Affective Lability Scale (ALS)). Relapsing is defined as the occurrence of a depressive episode, hypomanic, manic or mixed episode (DSMIV criteria). Other factors that may influence the risk of relapse have been suggested in the literature but have not been formally tested in prospective studies: 1. cognitive deficits: the existence of neuropsychological deficits in bipolar disorder are well documented and their role in the risk of relapse is suspected. Yet the nature of these deficits, their origin and their course remain poorly investigated. Indeed, some appear to be related to the neurotoxicity of the episodes themselves, the other being related to the vulnerability to bipolar disorder 2. The involvement of genetic vulnerability factors in bipolar disorder is widely demonstrated. Several arguments suggest the implication of genetic factors in the risk of relapse. This is the case for some outcome patterns such as rapid cycling or antidepressants induced mania. Again, this has never been tested in cohorts followed prospectively. 3. The role of certain inflammatory and infectious factors in the etiology of bipolar disorder has been suggested but it is clear whether these biomarkers are "state" or "traits". Thus, the role of neurotoxic inflammatory or infectious factors in relapse mood has never been tested in a prospective follow up studies. - Main objective of the project To determine if the scores of AIM and ALS, assessed at baseline in euthymic bipolar patients is associated with relapse in patients during a 2 years follow-up period. - Secondary objectives of the project Determine if the neuropsychological performance at T0, measured in euthymic patients predict relapse during a 2 years follow-up period. Determine whether the neuropsychological deficits observed in euthymic bipolar patients that contribute to functional impairment worsen with time. DNA collection to test the involvement of candidate genes Serum collection to study the biological and infectious biomarkers • Methodology Prospective follow up studies. Multicenter.
This phase II trial studies how well onalespib works in treating patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that has not responded to previous treatment (refractory) or that has returned after a period of improvement (recurrent). Onalespib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of lenalidomide and blinatumomab when given together in treating patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma that has returned after a period of improvement (relapsed). Biological therapies, such as lenalidomide, use substances made from living organisms that may stimulate or suppress the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. Blinatumomab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of interferon α after prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) among high-risk acute leukemia patients undergone unmanipulated blood and marrow transplantation. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment option for high-risk acute leukemia (AL). However, post-transplant relapse can occur in some patients, and the prognosis of these patients is usually very poor.Prophylactic DLI can decrease the risk of relapse of high-risk AL patients. Interferon α-2b exerts a relatively strong immunomodulatory effect. It can kill AL cells by regulating T-cell and/or natural killer cell functions.Consequently, interferon α-2b may have potential value for high-risk AL patients after transplantation. The study hypothesis: Using interferon α-2b after prophylactic DLI following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk AL can further reduce relapse rate and improve leukemia-free survival.
The study is aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of re-irradiation for patients with recurrent high grade gliomas after other treatment.
The overall goal of the project is to develop and evaluate a home-based intervention to prevent re-infection and transmission of Community-Acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) in patients presenting to primary care with skin or soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Centers for Disease Control (CDC) CA-MRSA guidelines include incision and drainage, antibiotic sensitivity testing and antibiogram-directed prescribing. Re-infections are common, ranging from 16% to 43%, and present significant challenges to clinicians, patients and their families. Several decolonization and decontamination interventions have been shown to reduce Hospital-Acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) re-infection and transmission in intensive care units. Few studies examine the feasibility and effectiveness of these infection prevention interventions into primary care settings, and none employ Community Health Workers (CHWs) or "promotoras" to provide home visits for education and interventions about decolonization and decontamination. This comparative effectiveness research/patient centered outcomes research builds upon a highly stakeholder-engaged community-academic research and learning collaborative, including practicing clinicians, patients, clinical and laboratory researchers, and barbers/beauticians. Clinical Directors Network (CDN), an established, NIH-recognized best practice Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Practice-based Research Network (PBRN), and The Rockefeller University propose to address this question through the completion of four aims: (1) To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of a CHW/Promotora-delivered home intervention (Experimental Group) as compared to Usual Care (Control Group) on the primary patient-centered and clinical outcome (SSTI recurrence rates) and secondary patient-centered and clinical outcomes (pain, depression, quality of life, care satisfaction) using a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). (2) To understand the patient-level factors (CA-MRSA infection prevention knowledge, self-efficacy, decision-making autonomy, prevention behaviors/adherence) and environmental-level factors (household surface contamination, household member colonization, transmission to household members) that are associated with differences in SSTI recurrence rates. (3) To understand interactions of the intervention with bacterial genotypic and phenotypic variables on decontamination, decolonization, SSTI recurrence, and household transmission. (4) To explore the evolution of stakeholder engagement and interactions among patients and other community stakeholders with practicing community-based clinicians and academic laboratory and clinical investigators over the duration of the study period.