View clinical trials related to Psychotic Disorders.
Filter by:The goal of this project, which has not changed, is to evaluate the statewide implementation of a two-component intervention (health promotion plus academic detailing) with respect to consumer outcomes and changes in provider prescribing. The intervention, called In SHAPE, is delivered to people with serious mental illness (SMI) by two community mental health clinics (CMHCs). These CMHCs are compared to two CMHCs delivering usual-care to individuals with SMI. The specific aims of this study are: 1. Evaluate person-level and provider-level outcomes including: (a) consumer health behaviors, health indicators, mental health indicators, and acute health service utilization, (b) provider prescribing practices and program fidelity, and (c) program costs. 2. Evaluate system-level outcomes including: (a) consumer health behaviors and health indicators, (b) provider prescribing and program fidelity, and (c) acute services use.
Few studies targeting obesity in serious mental illness have reported clinically significant risk reduction, and non have been replicated in community settings or demonstrated sustained outcomes after intervention withdrawal. The researchers sought to replicate positive health outcomes demonstrated in a previous randomized effectiveness study of the In SHAPE program across urban community mental health organizations serving an ethnically diverse population.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential benefits of combining cognitive remediation and exercise in improving cognitive functioning and response to psychiatric rehabilitation.
This study aims to evaluate whether psychiatric home treatment is an effective and efficient alternative to acute inpatient care in mental hospitals. A one-year prevalence cohort of psychiatric patients in need of hospitalization are randomly assigned to either treatment at inpatient wards (treatment as usual) or a new care model with the additional option of treating patients at their homes by mobile care teams. The primary focus is on checking whether optional home treatment leads to a reduction of inpatient days during a two-year follow-up period. In addition, the two service models will be compared regarding treatment cost and outcomes as well as satisfaction of patients and their relatives with psychiatric care. Furthermore, a sub-cohort of randomly chosen patients from the prevalence-cohort will be examined by a highly trained clinical assessor to test and verify the diagnoses and the clinical ratings made by the staff members of the mental hospital under routine everyday conditions.
The objective of this study is to explore the longitudinal course of self-disturbances (SD) in schizophrenia. The main aim of the study is to investigate, in a 6-7-year follow-up of a representative sample of patients with first-episode schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other psychoses. The overall aim is to expand our knowledge about the role of SDs in psychotic disorders. Increased knowledge here will aid diagnosis and treatment. The current study is a seven year follow-up of this representative cohort, with baseline measures of SDs and a comprehensive clinical and neurocognitive assessment battery.
General objective: To assess the effectiveness of a treatment program specific for cannabis abuse (cognitive behavioral treatment + pharmacological treatment) compared to standard treatment (pharmacological treatment + psychoeducation) in patients with first episodes psychosis (FEP) cannabis users. Design A multicenter single-blind randomized study with 1 year of follow-up. The effectiveness of a treatment program specific for cannabis abuse (cognitive behavioral treatment + pharmacological treatment) compared to standard treatment (pharmacological treatment + psychoeducation) in patients with first episodes psychosis (FEP) cannabis users will be assessed. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1. Experimental group (N=50): Cognitive-behavioral treatment specific for cannabis abuse + pharmacological treatment 2. Control group (N=50): standard treatment: psychoeducation + pharmacological treatment
Task sharing mental health care through integration of mental health into primary health care (PHC) is advocated as a means of narrowing the treatment gap for mental disorders in low-income countries. In Ethiopia, it is estimated that only around 10% of people with severe mental disorders (SMDs) ever receive evidence-based treatment for their condition, largely due to scarcity of specialist mental health services. A task-sharing model of mental health care in PHC would be more affordable and accessible to the majority of persons with SMD who do not currently receive evidence-based mental health care. Furthermore, task sharing mental health care with PHC is about to be scaled up in Ethiopia in line with the National Mental Health Strategy. However, the effectiveness of the task sharing model of mental health care for people with SMD has not been evaluated systematically in a low-income country. In this study we propose to investigate non-inferiority of a task sharing model of mental health care in PHC compared to a less accessible, but more specialist, psychiatric nurse-led model of care. The specialist model of care has been demonstrated to be acceptable and associated with improved clinical outcomes for persons with SMD engaged in the service in Ethiopia thus making this an appropriate comparison model against which to evaluate non-inferiority of the task sharing model.
The main objective of the trial is to evaluate, how long an antipsychotic relapse-prevention should be continued and to which time a patient with schizophrenia is protected enough, so that a withdrawal or reduction of the medication seems appropriate. Relapse is defined as primary outcome.
The purpose of this study is to establish a cohort of pregnant women with severe mental disorder and to identify biological and psycho-social transmission mechanisms involved in the development of 'risk' and 'resilience' in the offspring. It is assumed that both 'resilient' and 'risk' development in offspring are caused by a complex interaction between multiple biological, psychological and social factors. The project focuses specifically on exploring the impact of physiological stress-sensitivity, attachment, care-giving and the familial and social context for care-giving. Previous studies support these factors as important for the development of these infants, but systematic research using a prospective design is needed to strengthen evidence and elucidate the importance of these factors in more detail. The interaction over time of physiological stress-sensitivity, attachment, care-giving and the familial and social context for care-giving are evaluated in terms of the evolution of very early indicators of developmental risk and resilience in infants with a known highly increased risk for developing a mental disorder.The findings of the study may potentially lead to more specific targets for preventive interventions, which can improve developmental outcome for these infants.
The selection of antipsychotic in early stages of the illness is mainly determined by its clinical effectiveness. Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are the first line drug treatment for individuals suffering from schizophrenia. It is clear that SGAs are not a homogeneous group and clinical effects and profile of side effects differ between SGAs. Differences among antipsychotics in terms of effectiveness have turned out to be a topic of increasing research interest, although comparisons between the different SGAs are scarce. In first episode of psychosis, SGAs have shown a higher treatment effectiveness compared to first generation antipsychotics (FGAs) (findings primarily driven by Haloperidol). Less evident seems to be the notion that some of the SGAs might be more effective (in terms of treatment discontinuation) than others. Most of the medium-term randomized studies have shown similar rates of all-cause treatment discontinuation in first episode patients treated with different SGAs. It may be concluded that more randomized controlled trails should be accomplished to determine the position of frequently used SGAs in clinical practice. The investigators undertook this study with the major objective of comparing the clinical effectiveness of three widely utilized SGAs (Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone and Quetiapine) in the acute treatment of first-episode non-affective psychosis individuals.