View clinical trials related to Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Filter by:The study objective is to assess the safety and efficacy of iTind three to five years following treatment.
To study Safety and efficacy of Tadalafil vs. Tadalafil with Sildosin in the management of moderately and severely symptomatic patients of prostatic hyperplasia
To determine if early apical release holmium enucleation of the prostate (EAR HoLEP), as a surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, reduces post-operative urinary incontinence compared to classic HoLEP.
This is a single center, prospective, investigational study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Embolization will be performed with LC Bead LUMI particles using a balloon occlusion microcatheter or standard microcatheter.
To compare the clinical outcome regarding safety and efficacy between Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common diseases in men. As BPH progresses, surgical treatments often become necessary. Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an established procedure in the surgical treatment of BPH, especially for medium to large prostates. The long learning curve, the length of surgery, and expensive equipment still limit the availability of HoLEP to a few specialized centers. Recently, a new method for treating BPH called aquablation has become commercially available. This technique uses real-time ultrasound imaging in combination with a robotic high-pressure water jet programmed and guided by the surgeon to resect prostate tissue. A RCT has shown functional results similar to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for small to medium size prostates . However, so far there are no controlled studies assessing whether Aquablation provides patient reported and functional outcomes that are non-inferior compared to HoLEP in medium size to large prostates (the latter cannot be operated by TURP due to its size limitations). As aquablation offers some obvious advantages compared to HoLEP regarding learning curve and operation time, the aim of this study is to test whether efficacy and safety of aquablation are non- inferior compared to HoLEP in patients with medium to large size prostates, which would clearly support the use of aquablation and change everyday clinical practice.
The investigator aims to prospectively investigate the efficacy and durability of the middle lobe only versus traditional complete photoselective greenlight vaporization of the prostate in patients with prominent middle lobe. The investigator will select patients based on pre-op cystoscopy if patients have a prominent middle lobe to participate in this study. Researches will start to vaporize only the middle lobe then, at the end of this step, The investigator will look at the verumontanum into the prostatic fossa and determine if the patient is having adequate opened prostatic fossa or not. Patients with unsatisfactory opened fossa will have a complete PVP of lateral lobes, while patients with a satisfactory channel will not receive a complete PVP. Primary objectives of the study are to look into pre and post-operative uroflowmetry and post-void residual, International prostate symptoms scores, need of catheterization, and need for secondary interventions over five then ten years. Secondary objectives are to look into erectile and ejaculatory status using the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ) and MSHQ-EjD Short Form for Assessing EjD. Researchers will follow the patients at three months, six months, one year then yearly for five years then an extension to up to 10 years.
The purpose of this study is to prove that low-energy (30W) Holmium laser prostatectomy (Holeb) is not inferior to high-energy (100W) Holmium laser prostatectomy (safety and effectiveness)
Evaluation of impact of Mirabegron on erectile function for patients treated for BPH
To evaluate the influence of BR9006-1 and BR9006-2 on pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability when administered separately or co-administered to healthy male volunteers.