View clinical trials related to Other.
Filter by:This phase Ib/II trial studies the best dose of glembatumumab vedotin when giving together with nivolumab and ipilimumab in treating patients with solid tumor that has spread to other places in the body and cannot be removed by surgery. Monoclonal antibodies, such as glembatumumab vedotin, nivolumab, and ipilimumab, may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread.
The KEO study is a single arm phase II trial including 44 patients with T1N1-2B, T2N0-N2B head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) eligible for curative-intent resection (+/- adjuvant therapy), who receive neo-adjvuant pembrolizumab + epacadostat. The primary objective of this study is to determine rate of major treatment effect (MTE) to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab+epacostat immunotherapy in SCCHN compared to historic data with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab alone.
There are no real-world data that describes how Radium-223 (Ra-223) is being used in combination with abiraterone/enzalutamide (abi/enza) or evidence describing outcomes of this combination usage for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To address these data gaps a cohort of mCRPC patients will be chosen who received Ra-223 concomitant with abi/enza in first line therapy to assess the treatment patterns following first line and clinical outcomes from initiation of first line treatment. For the purpose of this study concomitant use will be defined as Ra-223 initiated after at least 6 months from the start of first line abi/enza. The specific objectives of the study are to describe the outcomes, treatment patterns, patient and provider characteristics of mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223 concomittantly with abi/enza in first line treatment.
This is a phase II, multicenter, single-arm study to assess the safety and feasibility of combining crenolanib with fludarabine and cytarabine chemotherapy in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML. Patients will receive up to two courses of salvage chemotherapy with fludarabine, cytarabine, and crenolanib. Response will be assessed between day 29-43 of each course.
This is a multicenter, 2-arm open-label, randomized comparative phase II study in each of two separate cohorts (non-squamous NSCLC and squamous NSCLC) according to histology.
This study aims to evaluate cardiopulmonary interactions in patients with heat failure
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvular heart disease in Western countries, with increasing prevalence. Recent guidelines recommend aortic valve intervention (surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR] or transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR]) in severe AS, as soon as symptoms or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction occur, in order to improve clinical outcome and achieve LV mass (LVM) regression. The highest amount of LVM regression is obtained during the first year. Nevertheless, there is heterogeneity in LV remodeling and residual LV hypertrophy is associated with poorer postoperative improvement in cardiac function and morphology. Incomplete regression of LV hypertrophy at 12 months after SAVR is a powerful predictor of adverse outcome. Yet, the use of specific pharmacological therapy to improve postoperative LVM regression could be an appealing therapeutic option after aortic valve intervention. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers (RAASb) and more particularly angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) are efficient in reducing LVM in hypertensive patients, as emphasized by several meta-analyses. In addition, ARBs improve myocardial relaxation, diastolic function, decreased hypertrophy and may have anti-fibrotic effects. In a recent retrospective study from our group, RAASb prescription after SAVR was associated with increased survival, but confirmation through a randomized trial is mandatory. In a prospective randomized single-center study, the use of candesartan was associated both with LV and LA remodeling as compared to the conventional management. Nevertheless, these results are based on echocardiographic data, which is not the gold standard for the assessment cardiac remodeling, and no placebo or active comparator was tested to control the impact of ARBs in these patients. The primary objective of this Phase II study is to investigate the efficacy of valsartan, introduced postoperatively, as compared to placebo, on 1-year changes in indexed LVM, as assessed by CMR, in patients undergoing aortic valve intervention (SAVR or TAVR) for AS. The secondary objectives are to compare the efficacy of valsartan vs. placebo in terms of one-year changes (difference from baseline) in cardiac function and in cardiac morphology, one-year exercise capacity and one-year changes in biomarkers related to cardiac function. In addition, the assessment of the safety of valsartan will also be considered as secondary objective. The ARISTOTE trial is a multicenter prospective phase II, randomized, double-blind study including patients with the diagnosis of severe AS and indication for valve intervention. The active treatment is valsartan, an orally active, potent, and specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Patients will be randomized between 2 groups (valsartan versus placebo) and the treatment will be initiated (80 mg daily) at 5±4 days following aortic valve intervention. The comparative treatment will be a placebo; tablets of valsartan and placebo have a similar appearance and administration mode. Patient in the control group will receive a placebo using the same protocol as the valsartan group. The patients will be cautiously monitored and any adverse events will be collected. The dose will be increased at 160 mg daily 13±2 days after aortic valve intervention and, if well tolerated, for the remaining period of the study. The tolerance will be regularly assessed and dose adjusted according to a pre-specified algorithm.
Expression of IDO and PD-1/L1 has been found to be increased in endometrial cancer. Expression of these markers on the tumor cells leads to immunosuppression in the micro-environment of tumors that prevents immune system from attacking and killing tumor cells. The purpose of this trial is to target these antigens by concomitant administration of drugs epacadostat and pembrolizumab, thereby removing twin mechanisms of immune-suppression that may lead to better control of tumor growth.
ARTemIS-Eso is a phase I-II, three-level, open-label trial with a dose-expansion cohort at recommended schedule in both esophageal cancer histological groups (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) of RCT and ImT administered prior to surgery.
PRECISE is a study to discover new detection, prognosis and treatment biomarkers for cancer. This is a prospective, multi-center, observational study designed to collect de-identified biospecimens and clinical data from a large cohort of participants from clinical research networks in the United States. In this study, the investigators propose creating a large-scale normalized panomics dataset specifically designed for deep learning-based in silico analysis for biomarker discovery.