View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis.
Filter by:This study will test the quality of physician care decisions using a patient-simulation based measurement and feedback approach that combines multiple-choice care decisions with real-time, personalized scoring and feedback. The study will also measure the impact of gaming-inspired competition and motivation, including a weekly leaderboard, to improve evidence-based care decisions. In addition, the study the test the impact of CME and MOC credits on participant engagement in the process.
A randomized controlled trial in which Neuro-muscular exercise training and Isolated quadriceps training program would be applied on patients with symptomatic knee Osteoarthritis by using different tools and changes would be examined pre and post intervention .The participants fulfilling inclusion criteria would be randomly allocated to two groups. Both groups received different protocols and will be assessed on data collection tool on their first and last visit by using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), The Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Timed Up and Go test (TUG test), 30sec chair stand test,6min walk test (6MWT).Participants of both groups will be pre-tested before the application of interventional programs and post-tested after the application of respective intervention.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease and leading cause of musculoskeletal pain and disability worldwide. The high rates of knee replacement surgery worldwide emphasize the need for more effective non-surgical interventions to attenuate progressive disability. International scientific and professional societies also propose that therapies need to seek efficacious combinations of modalities with the ultimate aim to achieve longer-term, optimal and synergistic treatment effects. Exercise therapy, such as strengthening and aerobic exercise, is universally, and strongly, recommended as it demonstrates beneficial effects on clinical symptoms and is considered safe for all patients with knee OA. However, during activities as simple as walking, higher knee joint loads have been demonstrated in people with medial tibiofemoral OA, a common form of knee OA. Increased joint loading as such may elicit aggravated symptoms and accelerated joint structural decline over time. No convincing evidence exists to confirm exercise therapy effectively alters joint loading parameters during walking gait in people with knee OA. Notably, recent studies suggest that wearing appropriate footwear may help offload the joint in people with knee OA, a strategy that is also easily applicable at a wide population level. The purpose of this clinical study is to compare 9-month treatment consisting of exercise therapy and daily wear of one of two shoe classes (flat flexible shoes or stable supportive shoes), on symptom relief and joint structural damage in people with knee OA. In this study, we will randomly allocate eligible participants in one of two treatment arms. This means there will be an equal amount of participants in each group, and participants nor researchers will be able to choose in which group participants will end up in.Participants in both groups will enroll in a 9 month exercise program and will be provided a pair of one of the two shoe classes to wear daily. To ensure an unbiased appraisal of treatment effects, we will not disclose the study hypotheses to participants during the intervention period. The results of this study will help determine whether the addition of appropriate footwear to exercise therapy improves symptom relief and/or slows structural disease progression in people with knee OA.
This study analize the incidence of acute renal failure after performing total knee arthroplasty with or without use of tourniquet limb cuff (half of patients for each group) in a randomized clinical trial
The investigators aim to explore the effects of action observation therapy on pain and brain hemodynamics in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This study will create a new perspective to understand the physiology of pain, by applying painful stimulation during the neuroimaging system which has attracted much interest in the literature in recent years, and will shed light on the studies that can be done in this regard. Participants' pain level will be assessed using Visual Analog Scale and pressure algometer. Also joint range of motion in the initial assessments will be measured by electro-goniometer, muscle strength assessment by JTech hand dynamometer at appropriate evaluation positions. Fear of movement of individuals will be assessed via Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale and functional levels will be assessed via Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Timed Up and Go Test. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will be used for evaluation of brain hemodynamics. The first group, will receive exercises with action observation therapy; and the second group will receive only exercises. The exercise programme will be administered under physiotherapist supervision for three days a week for six weeks. The evaluations will be repeated at the beginning of the study and at the end of the sixth week. Data obtained from the study will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.
This study explores the effects on pain, function and illness perceptions, of participating in clinical research versus being treated with standard care in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.
BACKGROUND: Current medical treatment strategies for knee osteoarthritis (OA) are aimed at pain reduction and symptom control. The Non-Arthroscopic Joint Lavage (NAJL) is included inside the therapeutic algorithm of knee OA when other therapies are contraindicated or have lost effectiveness. The large variety of potentially invasive interventions available (joint lavage included) has raised the need to assess their efficacy. The objective of this study is to compare the short-term effectiveness of five treatment strategies in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: It was conducted a randomized prospective study involving 150 patients of whom 76.7% were females. The age range was 40-81 years. All patients had knee OA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, with Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grades II and III. Patients were assigned to five groups, 1) non-arthroscopic joint lavage (NAJL) (n= 30), 2) NAJL plus hyaluronic acid (HA) (n= 32), 3) NAJL plus corticosteroid (CS) (n= 32), 4) HA (n= 31), 5) CS (n= 25). Evaluations took place at baseline, one and three months after enrollment. Demographic variables, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Lequesne scores were recorded. Statistical analysis included mixed analysis of variance, post-hoc comparisons with Sidak's adjustment, and multiple linear regression using as outcome WOMAC total at 3 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of the study was approved by the "Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía" Ethics Committee, under the number 1996, in the Minutes 208 of 29 May 2012.
This is a multi-phase study that will develop and test an osteoarthritis (OA) primary care Physical activity Care Pathway (OA-PCP), a scalable intervention that includes: 1) a practical process for physical inactivity screening in primary care, 2) a brief, tailored physical activity (PA) counseling intervention via telephone, 3) connection of patients with community programs and other resources to support PA, and 4) follow-up with patients to deliver additional appropriate counseling and referrals to PA resources.
This will be the second investigation by the PI and sub-investigator on this topic, following the promising results of a pilot study on a small sample size (N=5) completed last year. Whether or not core stabilization influences gait impairments in patients with KOA remains to be seen. Core stabilization has been shown to have positive effects, including increased stride velocity and scores on functional tests like the Functional Reach Test and Timed Up and Go, in older adults. Older adults were also shown to have high compliance with a core stability training program. A systematic review indicated that core training is important to consider when treating older individuals to improve functional use of the extremities, improving participation in activities of daily living, and as part of a fall prevention program. Additionally, it has been shown to benefit young, active individuals in preventing anterior cruciate ligament injury and greater duration of improved outcomes in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Athletes with decreased core control have been shown to be at an increased risk of knee injury as well. One potential cause for this is the ability of the core to improve lower extremity kinematics when activated during challenging single leg weight bearing activity. A recent publication by Azuma, et al. did indicate that paraspinal and anterior abdominal thinning had a negative predictive relationship to the presence of KOA; however, no investigation has explored a cause and effect relationship between core stability/stabilization training and the presence or severity of KOA, nor the gait and functional ability of patients with KOA. This later concept is the focus of this investigation.
Pain is the principal symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and results in a considerable amount of years lived with disability, emotional distress and has significant socioeconomic consequences. Conservative treatment options, such as exercise, often fail to provide long-term pain relief and alternatively patients may be subjected to total knee arthroplasty. More than 20% of these patients experience persistent and unchanged pain post-surgery. Novel advances in the field of cryoneurolysis applies low temperatures to disrupt nerve signaling at the painful area and a recent study showed that it was possible to target the peripheral nerves in the knee and provide significant pain relief in patients with knee OA. This could potentially improve the efficacy of other therapies such as exercise, delaying or perhaps avoiding surgical intervention and improving quality of life in OA patients considerably. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the effects of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee OA. The primary objective of the current project is to determine the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to decrease pain in patients with knee OA. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to improve outcomes in the GLA:D program to potentially delay or avoid surgical intervention. 90 individuals with knee OA in the knee will be randomly allocated in either a cryoneurolysis intervention group or a sham group. Both groups will be assessed at baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up. The patients, therapists and data-manager will be blinded to the allocation. The primary outcome will be VAS knee pain intensity score, measured post cryoneurolysis treatment. Secondary outcome measures include functional performance, PRO-data (KOOS, EQ5D), analgesic use, a socio-economic evaluation and adverse effects.