View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Knee.
Filter by:This is an objective cohort study using objective recording of physical activity (accelerometry) during and after the GLAiD intervention to investigate if a sedentary behavior change by participating in an 6-week physiotherapy-led exercise and education program (GLAiD) occurs. The GLAiD intervention is an education and exercise based intervention aiming at decreasing pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The primary outcome is change in objective recorded physical activity between baseline and follow-up.
This is a study of an over-the-counter, capsaicin-based (0.25%) topical analgesic for management of osteoarthritis knee pain meeting the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDAs) Tentative Final Monograph (TFM) guidance for "External Analgesic Drug Products For Over-the-Counter Human Use," published in the Federal Register on February 8, 1983 (final proposed 21 CFR 348). Subjects meeting the inclusion criteria and not meeting the exclusion criteria were randomized into one of four groups: once daily treatment with active product, once daily treatment with product vehicle (no capsaicin), twice daily treatment with active product, and twice daily treatment with product vehicle (no capsaicin), all for 7 consecutive days of treatment. The twice daily treatments were spaced approximately 12 hours apart. Osteoarthritis knee pain was assessed by the 100 mm visual analog scale. Osteoarthritis knee pain assessments were done each day for 28 days. Tolerability data were also collected.
This phase 2 study is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study of four concentrations of SM04690 (0.03, 0.07, 0.15, and 0.23 mg per 2 mL injection) injected intraarticularly (IA) into the target knee joint of subjects with moderately to severely symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA). Based on previous studies of SM04690, key phenotypes of laterality (unilateral vs bilateral) as well as chronic pain (as measured by the Widespread Pain Index) were identified as confounding variables impacting the overall assessment of both radiologic and clinical efficacy outcomes. The design of SM04690-OA-04 is based upon previous study designs while assessing strategies to combat the confounding impact of laterality and chronic pain. To evaluate the effect of IA vehicle injection on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) such as pain, stiffness, and function in OA, this study also includes one cohort that receives a 2 mL IA injection of vehicle (placebo), and one cohort that receives a sham injection (i.e., a needle stick with 0 mL vehicle injected).
The purpose of this study is to understand how the components of osteoarthritic knee joint fluid (synovial fluid) change after lavage treatment with platelet poor plasma. Additionally, the study participants will complete outcome questionnaire surveys before and after the treatment in conjunction with when synovial fluid is removed from the knee (2, 4, and 6 weeks after lavage). This data will help determine if the treatment of an osteoarthritic knee joint with platelet poor plasma lavage is a suitable stand-alone therapy or to improve outcome by preparing a patient's knee for further regenerative therapies.
The overall goal of this study is to identify what Physical Therapy care components are associated with the best patient-reported functional outcome after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) surgery. The investigators are specifically looking at outcomes at 6 and 12 months after surgery.
The purpose of our study is to determine if anatomic/kinematic total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are superior to mechanical axis-referenced TKAs with respect to determinants of gait functionality, patient satisfaction and other objective tests of knee function as a potential indicator of long-term prosthesis outcomes. To our knowledge there has not been any literature comparing TKAs using the kinematic and mechanical axes with respect to gait analysis. A single study has compared gender-specific TKAs and found that there is no difference with respect to determinants of gait when using these prostheses (Thomsen et al, 2012), but again this study was not based on referencing off of the anatomical/kinematic axis of the knee. Our group is hoping that the small variability that may be detectable with the precision of gait analysis may be used as a predictor of future prosthesis outcome measures.
The study proposes to compare performances and safety of intra-articular injections of aMAT with those of a control group (PRP injections) for the treatment of symptomatic OA of the knee. The end-points will be determined evaluating the performances of the treatment group in terms of improvement of the symptomatology, functional recovery and radiological appearance.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if anodal tDCS stimulation over M1 may decrease chronic knee OA pain in elderly subjects with defective CPM. In addition, this trial will help to investigate the role of central sensitization in knee OA and evaluate how tDCS stimulation may affect it.
The objective of this study is complete a longitudinal cross-over clinical study to investigate the effect of treatments for knee pathology, including cutaneous stimulation (skin vibration and soft knee brace), on locomotion tasks (i.e. walking, jogging, stair ascending and descending), muscle function, and pain/function.
Individuals with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA) experience restricted physical function. Few previous studies have investigated comprehensive sets of constructs and tests to investigate physical function in these patients. Most single studies of knee OA patients show limited scope for explaining physical function in the perspective of WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) 3 levels: Body functions (the bodily level), Activities (individual level), and Participation (societal level). On the bodily level there is limited case-control knowledge on muscle strength beyond the knee and endurance-strength in general. On the activity level, there is similar limitation of biomechanical bodily features in stair climbing. On the participation level the situation is similar for objective performance. Measures are needed that inter-relate all three levels of ICF. These should also include well discriminating tests e.g. knee strength, walking, and activities of daily life (ADL), as well as both objective and subjective measures. The purpose of this study is to explore mechanisms that can explain physical function in patients with knee OA in primary care. The study's main and primary goal is to quantify which baseline factors and change scores are the strongest predictors of a positive treatment outcome in terms of patients' global perceived change after physiotherapy. Secondary research question is: which factors are the strongest predictors of a positive outcome of physiotherapy in knee OA, in terms of pain intensity, patient specific functional scale, and function in daily living?