View clinical trials related to Opioid Use.
Filter by:A growing body of research underscores the life- and cost-saving advantages of equipping people who use opioids with naloxone, but very little is known about: 1) barriers to naloxone awareness and access, and 2) the potential psychosocial and behavioral impacts of being "protected" by naloxone while engaging in overdose risk behaviors, of using naloxone on someone else, and of surviving an overdose in which naloxone is used. This research will provide insight into both of these domains to yield a richly contextualized understanding of the processes and mechanisms underlying changes in overdose risk behaviors related to naloxone access and use and will illuminate the disparities that may limit access to naloxone for some or result in compensatory behavior following naloxone exposure for others. Findings from this study will provide an empirical basis to strengthen and refine existing overdose prevention efforts and to design tailored interventions to engage opioid users who have recently survived or reversed an overdose.
This study examines the comparative effectiveness of opioid review programs in reducing unsafe opioid prescribing in two states: prospective prior authorization (PA) with hard stops in Washington and retrospective review (RR) with prescriber notification in Ohio.
Spinal surgery is typically associated with severe postoperative pain. Although the number of spinal surgeries has increased day by day, postoperative pain management have been limited. The recently described thoracolumbar interfacial plane block (TLIPB) has been reported to provide effective postoperative analgesia in spinal surgery. In addition, the recently described erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is obtained by applying the local anesthetic drug between the fascia of the spina muscles and the transverse process of the vertebrae. Anatomical and radiological investigations in fresh cadavers suggest that the potential place of influence of ESPB is dorsal and ventral spinal nerve roots. A small number of publications showing the analgesic efficacy of ESP in spinal surgery have been reported in the literature. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of TLIPB and ESPB in spinal surgeries.
This is a double blinded randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen administered to patients on schedule compared to ibuprofen alone on the patient's reported pain score on the second post-operative day after Cesarean delivery. The investigators will also record opiate consumption and pain scores throughout the hospitalization of participants, and will survey patients at one and two weeks after surgery regarding opiate consumption and quality of life.
This study evaluates differences in how administering liposomal bupivacaine via two different methods affects postoperative pain control in laparoscopic abdominal surgery patients. Half the participants will receive liposomal bupivacaine via a transverses abdominis plane block while the other half will receive liposomal bupivacaine via local infiltration.
Liposomal bupivacaine has gained interest in recent literature for its potential to be an effective adjunct to other pain control modalities in a multi-modal approach to post-operative pain control. The goal of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of local administration of liposomal bupivacaine versus the efficacy of a peripheral nerve block in terms of post-operative pain scores after elective ankle and hindfoot surgery. The investigators hypothesize that there will not be a significant difference in the pain scores of these two groups in opioid naïve patients.
Background: Analgesia remains to this day a challenge for anesthesiologists. Dexmedetomidine, a potent central alpha-2 agonist, has been shown to have analgesic and opioid sparing effects. The classic analgesic strategy focuses on opioid administration guided by estimated time of elimination and hemodynamic response (increase in blood pressure and heart rate). This technique is not sensitive and forces the anesthesiologist to be one step behind nociception, the patient's unconscious response to pain. PMD-200 (Medasense, Israel) displays the Nociceptive level (NOL)-Index as marker of nociception. The NOL-Index ranges from 0 (no nociception) to 100 (intense nociception) and the recommended analgesic range during surgery is from 10 to 25 (Medasense recommendations). The goal of this study is to compare two analgesia strategies guided by the NOL Index (range 10-25) using either remifentanil TCI (target controlled infusion) alone or remifentanil TCI associated with a continuous dexmedetomidine infusion. Methods: A total of 100 patients will be included and informed consent will be acquired. This bi-center study will take place at Erasme University Hospital (primary center) and Saint-Pierre University Hospital. Patients will be randomized into either two groups: remifentanil and placebo versus remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Both groups will be monitored using the PMD-200 that will guide the analgesic therapy strategy. Investigators and patients will be blinded to dexmedetomidine and placebo administration. The primary outcome will be intraoperative remifentanil consumption. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative opioid administration, opioid associated complications, hemodynamics, and hospital length of stay.
The aim of this study is to determine if local wound infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine at the time of cesarean delivery can decrease opioid use and provide adequate post-operative pain control.
Despite many recent advances in pain management, post-operative pain is widely considered to be poorly managed. Furthermore, the mainstay of current pain management is opioids, for which there is strong evidence of ill effects and long-term potential for addiction. There are many studies demonstrating that perineural regional anesthesia can be superior to intravenous opioid analgesia, and that the technique is safe. By using temporary implanted catheters, this method can now deliver prolonged analgesia, thus reducing the need for opioids in the postoperative period. Regional anesthesia is a proven technique and used daily by anesthesiologists, and it is also the first choice for hip and knee replacement surgery for orthopedic surgeons. Patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with the use of free tissue transfer experience a significant amount of post-operative pain due to the complexity of the surgery, the presence of a head and neck surgical site as well as a secondary donor site, and existing co-morbidities, most commonly malignancy, that also cause significant pain. These patients often require opioids for pain control throughout the hospital stay, and are almost always discharged home with additional opioids. By utilizing regional anesthesia blocks at the donor sites, the investigators can potentially reduce post-operative pain while also reducing the use of opioids.
This will be a pilot study utilizing Virtual Reality Analgesia (VRA) as a first line nonpharmacologic analgesic intervention on the Acute Rehabilitation Unit. In order to assess the efficacy of the intervention with a set of outcome measures will be defined: - Pain will be measured using the VAS for all subjects pre-, during and post-intervention via self-report. - Number of opioids/oral pain medication consumed will be analyzed - Patient anxiety will be measured on the Short ( State-Trait Anxiety Index) STAI anxiety scale pre- and post-intervention. - Heart rate and blood pressure will also be measured pre and post intervention.