View clinical trials related to Nociceptive Pain.
Filter by:Recently, Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) has been evaluated for objectively measuring peri-operative pain and to guide intra-operative opioid administration during various surgeries. Propofol injection pain (PIP) is a common problem and can be very distressing to the patient.
Coccygodynia is a painful clinical picture of the sacrococcygeal region.Pain in coccygodynia may be somatic, neuropathic or mixed. There are many studies that emphasize the relationship between vitamin D deficiency and pain.In this study, it is aimed to investigate the severity and type of pain, as well as the effect of vitamin D level on pain in patients with coccygodynia
Evaluating the intraoperative pain is a major challenge for the anesthesia team. During anesthesia, changes in heart rate and blood pressure are interpreted qualitatively to evaluate the sympathetic response to nociceptive stimulation or the adaptation of analgesia during surgery. The new nociception monitors under development quantitatively explore other variables dependent on sympathetic activity or sympathetic / parasympathetic balance, such as the pulse wave amplitude measurement (Surgical Pleth Index (SPI index)), the pupil dilation reflex, respiratory sinus arrhythmia (ANI, Analgesia Nociception Index), or skin conductance index. Taken independently, these tools provide an assessment of nociception based on variations in the autonomic system, more robust than simply observing heart rate or blood pressure raw values. However, the relationship between variations in the neurovegetative system and pain can be compromised by various factors or intraoperative events such as hypovolemia, bleeding, certain sympathomimetic or sympatholytic treatments, the hypnosis depth, ventilation variation, fast filling, or body temperature. Moreover, investigators do not know the delay between the application of the painful stimulus and the observation of the variation of the different neurovegetative variables. This constitutes a limit of the practitioners' confidence in these monitoring tools. The nociception transmission pathways of to the vegetative centers and cortical areas are complex. Investigators hypothesis is that neurovegetative variations in response to nociceptive stimulation are not always associated with a cortical somatosensory response. In this project investigators investigate the relation between cortical (EEG) and vegetative reactions to acute and tonic nociceptive stimuli, as a preliminary step to apply these procedures to assess intraoperative reactions to nociceptive procedures in anesthetized patients.
The primary aim is to characterize the prevalence, severity and quality of musculoskeletal nociceptive pain in adult patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMD). The secondary objectives are to evaluate whether severity and distribution of muscle pain is associated with muscle function, and to assess whether muscle pain is associated with alterations of muscle elasticity and muscle stiffness. Results of patients with neuromuscular disorders will be compared to age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. Approx. 70 patients with neuromuscular disorders and 20 healthy volunteers will be enrolled, including patients with the following neuromuscular disorders: histologically confirmed inclusion body myositis (IBM), genetically confirmed late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD), genetically confirmed spinal muscular atrophy type 3 (SMA3), genetically confirmed facio-scapulo-humeral muscle dystrophy (FSHD), genetically confirmed myotonic dystrophy type 1 or type 2 (DM1, DM2). The duration of patient recruitment will be around 12 months.
Pupillometry has been used in healthy volunteers to investigate the usefulness of the pupil light reflex as an indicator of pain intensity on pressure as a nociceptive stimulus. In this sense, it is necessary to check if the pupillometry is sensitive to different types or sources of pain. One of these devices is the Algiscan® portable pupillometer (IdMed, Marseille, France), which we propose to use in the present study. This pupillometer has previously been used in healthy volunteers, and in patients admitted to the intensive care unit, subjected to mechanical ventilation and sedation / analgesia. This study in healthy volunteers aims to evaluate whether the PDR can be a reliable and discriminatory measure of the intensity of nociception, applying various types of nociceptive stimuli. If so, this study could lead to the use of pupillometry as an objective measure of nociception in settings where patients cannot communicate, such as intensive care areas or perioperative settings.
The aim of this study will be to investigate the effect of an opioid-free anesthesia regimen with a mixture of dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-ketamine in the same syringe versus fentanyl analgesia in elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery
Pediatric Validation of CONOX Monitoring device (qCON and qNOX indices) for anesthesia depth during surgery
Opioid administration in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is essential to maintaining patient respiratory and hemodynamic stability. Mechanical ventilation is a persistently nociceptive event that can continuously causes discomfort in the trachealy intubated patient. This can lead to patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, tachycardia, hypertension, and their associated complications. Opioids blunt respiratory drive, which facilitates mechanical ventilation, and decrease the sympathetic response to nociception. However, excessive opiate administration is associated with many adverse events, including respiratory depression, delirium, ileus, nausea, and vomiting. Currently, the standard administration in our institution of sufentanil, a potent opiate, consists of continuous infusions of 0.15µg/kg/h to 0.3µg/kg/h. Mechanically ventilated patients are unable to speak and are often sedated. This greatly impacts the patient's capacity to communicate pain. The use of a nociceptive monitor may be a possible solution. Skin conductance monitoring (Pain Monitor, Med-Storm, Norway), measures the peaks per second of electrical conduction. This non hemodynamic monitor uses skin conduction as a surrogate to nociception (i.e., the patient's unconscious response to a noxious stimulus). It may consequently guide opioid administration in ICU patients towards and avoid the consequences of excessive or inadequate antinociception.
The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study is to compare the analgesic properties of propofol and sevoflurane using variation of the NOL index and standard monitoring (Heart Rate and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure) when patients under general anaesthesia with either agents are subjected to a standardized painful stimulus (a tetanic stimulation over the ulnar nerve at 70 mA, 100 Hz for 30 seconds).
The investigators will select two study groups from a population of patients with severe chronic low back pain (CLBP) of facet joint (FJ) origin already treated with conventional radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus (MBDR) and that failed to obtain a 50% pain reduction measured through the numerical rate scale (NRS) for at least 3 months. Severe CLBP is considered a value of at least 7 by NRS pain assessment. The first group will be characterized by a nociceptive/mechanic type of back pain. The second group of study will be characterized by a neuropathic type of back pain. This difference will be established by a DN4 score of at least 4 points (Doleur Neurophatique 4). The patients in the group with nociceptive/mechanic back pain will be randomly assigned to conventional radiofrequency ablation or to water cooled radiofrequency (WCRF) of the MBDR. The patients in the group with neuropathic back pain will be randomly assigned CRFA of MBDR or to pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). The study will be carried on for an estimated time of 3 years. Primary outcomes will be: - at least 50% back pain reduction for at least 3 months evaluated through NRS, with a subcategorization of results that will consider a mean difference in effect (respect to the initial evaluation, with an initial NRS score of at least 7) of 1 point on NRS pain scale as small/modest, 2 points as moderate, more than 2 as large/substantial between the case/control study groups. - improvement of low back pain disability: 10 points increase on the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI) have been proposed as minimal clinically important differences, between 10 and 20 as moderate, more than 20 as large/substantial clinical improvement at month 3 and 6. Secondary outcome will be evaluated by the 12-item short form survey SF12, accordingly with the clinical pre-interventional findings, analgesic intake at month 1-3-6 (if increased, unchanged, decreased, in dosages or number of pain killers' assumption). Groups sizes: will be calculated based on the disease's incidence and the outcome targets.