View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:Background: Pregnant women can get a DNA analysis of their blood. The test tells a woman and her doctor about the DNA of her unborn baby. But some women get test results that are abnormal or not reportable. Researchers want to learn more about the relationship between these test results and cancer. Objective: To better understand prenatal DNA test results and how they can predict cancer, if present, in pregnant women. Eligibility: Women 18 and older who got prenatal DNA test results that were abnormal or not reportable and suggested the abnormality was in the woman and not her baby. Design: Potential participants will be screened by phone or in person. They will talk about their medical history and send copies of their medical records. Eligible participants will have a physical exam and medical history. They will give blood and stool samples. They may have a Pap smear. They will talk to a specialist about the test results they got when they were pregnant. Participants will have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They will lie on a table that slides in and out of a metal tube, taking pictures. Participants will complete a paper or electronic survey. It will assess their emotional well-being. Participants will get a list of any possible diagnoses and treatment options. Participants may be followed for up to 5 years. They may give blood samples and copies of their medical records. This can be done without traveling to the NIH. In some cases, people might come back to the NIH in one year to see if anything has changed.
Endoscopic characterization is now essential in front of a colorectal lesion to predict its histology and choose the best therapeutic strategy. Different classifications have been proposed to predict histology depending on the endoscopic aspect. Thus, the aspect of the shape of the lesion is described in the Paris classification, the aspect of the mucosal pattern in Kudo's classification and the vascular pattern in Sano's one. Recently, classifications combining several color and mucosal and vascular pattern criteria have been described as the NICE classification or even more recently the Japanese JNET classification. However, although the interest in combining the Paris, Sano and Kudo criteria has recently shown its interest, there was not yet an overall classification covering all the published criteria. We have created a synthetic classification called CONECCT grouping the different criteria for an initial educational purpose. We have demonstrated that this tool allows interns and gastroenterologists to progress in the histological prediction of colorectal lesions presented in the form of photo files. Nevertheless, comparative data of the performances of those different classifications to predict the histology and the concordance intra and inter-observer have never been published. To validate this CONECCT classification, we created this comparative study evaluating the endoscopic characterization performances of these different classifications in terms of histological prediction and intra- and interobserver concordance in a group of gastroenterologists with varying levels of expertise in front of colorectal lesions presented in the form of photographic records.
The primary objectives of this study are : to assess the safety and tolerability, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BGB-A1217 (known as Ociperlimab) in combination with tislelizumab in participants with advanced solid tumors in phase 1. Primary objective of Phase 1b is to assess overall response rate (ORR) determined by Investigator per RECIST v1.1 for patients in each dose- expansion cohort
This study is to characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, pharmacodynamics (PD) and anti-tumor activity of AK112, a PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, as a single agent in adult subjects with advanced solid tumor malignancies. The study consists of a dose escalation phase (Phase 1a) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for AK112 as a single agent, and a dose expansion phase (Phase 1b) in subjects with specific tumor types which will characterize treatment of AK112 as a single agent at the MTD or RP2D.
This clinical trial evaluates the use of microdialysis catheters during surgery to collect biomarkers, and studies the feasibility of intraoperative microdialysis during neurosurgery for central nervous system malignancies. A biomarker is a measurable indicator of the severity or presence of disease state. Information collected in this study may help doctors to develop new strategies to better diagnose, monitor, and treat brain tumors.
To determine the safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of FF-10850 (topotecan liposome injection) in patients with advanced solid tumors.
This phase II trial studies how well F-18 fluoroethyltyrosine (fluoroethyltyrosine) works in detecting tumors in participants with intracranial tumors that have come back. FET accumulates in malignant cells within intracranial neoplasms and can be used to detect recurrent disease and characterize the grade of glial neoplasms. Imaging agents such as FET can help oncologist to see the tumor better during a positron emission tomography (PET) scan.
This is an open-label, Phase 1b/2 study to determine the recommended dose of lucitanib in combination with nivolumab in patients with an advanced solid tumor (Phase 1b); followed by evaluation of the safety and efficacy of lucitanib and nivolumab in patients with an advanced gynecological solid tumor (Phase 2) and evaluate the effects of dosing under fasting or fed state (Food Effect)
Ref: Protocol v9.0, dated 7Nov2023. NOUS-209-01 is a multicenter, open-label, multiple cohorts, clinical study, designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity, and to detect any preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity of Nous-209 genetic polyvalent vaccine plus pembrolizumab combination therapy in adult subjects with unresectable or metastatic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or MSI-H CRC, gastric, or gastro-esophageal junction (G-E junction) tumors. Nous-209 is based on a heterologous prime/boost regimen composed of the Great Ape Adenovirus GAd20-209-FSP used for priming and Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara MVA-209-FSP used for boosting. The Phase I portion of the study is a first-in-human (FIH) clinical study with a primary objective to elucidate the safety and tolerability of Nous-209 in addition to establishing the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D), whereas the Phase II was introduced to assess efficacy as the primary objective.
There are 5 parts to this study for which the primary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of navitoclax when administered alone (Part 1) or when administered in combination with ruxolitinib (Part 2). In Part 2, participants must have been receiving a stable dose of ruxolitinib therapy for at least 12 weeks prior to study enrollment. In Part 3, all eligible participants will receive navitoclax, with the primary objective being to evaluate potential navitoclax effect on QTc prolongation. In Part 4, effect of navitoclax is evaluated on the PK, safety, and tolerability of a single dose of celecoxib. In Part 5, all eligible participants will receive ruxolitinib twice daily and navitoclax once daily for drug-drug interaction (DDI) assessment, followed by continued administration of navitoclax in combination with ruxolitinib.