View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:This is an open-label, phase I-II dose-escalation and expansion study designed to define the recommended dose of brigatinib as monotherapy in pediatric and young adult patients with ALK+ ALCL, IMT or other solid tumors and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), (long-term) safety, and efficacy of brigatinib in these children.
This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belzutifan monotherapy in participants with advanced pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET), von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Disease-Associated Tumors, Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (wt GIST), or Advanced Solid Tumors With hypoxia inducible factor-2 alpha (HIF-2α) related genetic alterations. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) of belzutifan per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR).
This study is a single-arm, open-label, single-center study to assess the safety of tislelizumab with BCG, and to obtain the preliminary efficacy results in subjects who have been diagnosed with high-risk NMIBC without prior BCG treatment.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of IBI323(anti-LAG-3/PD-L1) or in combination with chemotherapy in participants with advanced malignancies. Another purpose is to determine the pharmacokinetics,pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of IBI323
This trial is an open, two-stage, multi-center, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Utidelone in advanced solid tumors (excluding breast cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer) that have failed standard of treatment or were unable to perform standard treatment. This trial is divided into 2 stages, screening stage and expansion stage. In the screening stage, 10 patients were enrolled for each tumor type(including Squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck, Esophageal cancer, Stomach cancer, Pancreatic cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma, Ovarian cancer and Other solid tumors). Based on the results of the tumor type screening stage, the sponsor and the main investigator will have a discussion and have the alignment of tumor types to enter the expansion stage. The expansion stage will refine the inclusion / exclusion criteria and may adjust the treatment plan based on the tumor type and the combination drug selection. A total of 30-50 patients (including patients enrolled in the screening stage) were enrolled in each specified tumor type during the expansion stage.
Platinum-based chemotherapy, alternating at 21-days intervals with cycles of ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide (ICE) and subsequently received radiotherapy were considered as standard treatment for intracranial germ cell tumors. However, whether reliable clinical data can quantify the damage degree of immunologic function caused by chemotherapy and radiotherapy is still unknown. This project regards the level of lymphocyte and immunocyte in peripheral blood as a quantitative index to reflect the dynamic change of the immunologic function of patients with CNS germ cell tumors before and after chemoradiotherapy treatment. Meanwhile, the investigators will also investigate the relationship between the level of lymphocyte and immunocyte in peripheral blood and the response rate of therapy.This study is designed to prospectively analyze the dynamic changes of immune status, prognosis and society function after standard treatment in patients with intracranial germ cell tumor.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PK profile of HMPL-295S1 and determine MTD and/or RP2D in patients with advanced malignant solid tumor. It will be extended to enroll 10-15 patients at this dose after RP2D is determined, as to further evaluate the safety of RP2D and the preliminary efficacy of HMPL-295S1. In addition, an exploratory study on the pharmacokinetic biomarkers of HMPL-295S1 is planned in this study.
Patients with digestive tract malignancy often experience severe and unremitting abdominal pain that negatively affects physical, emotional, and social function, as well as health related quality of life (HRQOL). Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising and evidence-based treatment modality for cancer pain. Users of VR wear a pair of goggles with a close-proximity screen in front of the eyes that creates a sensation of being transported into lifelike, three-dimensional worlds. To date, VR has been limited to short-term clinical trials for cancer pain. Moreover, limited research exists on theory-based VR modalities beyond mere distraction, such as VR that employs acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with components of biofeedback and mindfulness. To bridge these gaps, this study seeks to: (1) assess the impact of immersive VR on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including pain, activity metrics, and opioid use among patients with visceral pain from a digestive tract malignancy; (2) assess differences in PROs, activity metrics, and opioid use between skills-based VR therapy vs. distraction VR therapy; and (3) determine patient-level predictors of VR treatment response in visceral cancer pain. To address these aims, the study will measure PROs and opioid use in 360 patients randomized among 3 groups and follow them for 60 days after enrollment: (1) an enhanced VR group receiving skills-based VR; (2) a distraction-based VR group receiving patient-selected VR videos; and (3) a VR sham control group using a VR headset with 2-D content. The results will inform best practices for the implementation of VR for visceral cancer pain management and guide selection of patient-tailored experiences.
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Sodium Stibogluconate in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) with p53 mutation from a defined list. The list includes 65 p53 mutations that were experimentally confirmed to be pharmacologically restored with tumor-suppressive function by antimonials.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of ATRN-119 through the performance of a Phase 1/2a, open-label, safety, PK, and preliminary efficacy study of oral ATRN-119 in patients with advanced solid tumors.