View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:The aim is to assess the relative efficacy of S-1 de-escalation therapy vs. continuation of chemotherapy after induction therapy in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer in terms of overall survival.
Anagrelide is a drug that has been shown to slow down how fast platelets are made in the bone marrow, and has been approved by the FDA for treating high platelets counts in patients with bone marrow disorders. Anagrelide Controlled Release ("CR") is a new preparation of anagrelide that is made to dissolve more slowly than currently marketed versions of this drug. Because of this, the anagrelide is taken up into the blood more slowly. Researchers think that this slower release of the drug could help to lower side effects that might be caused by high blood levels when the drug dissolves as quickly as it does with the currently marketed product. The main purposes of this study are to see how well Anagrelide CR can control platelet counts in patients with high platelet levels, to see what kind of side effects it causes, and to measure blood levels of the drug.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the safety of prexasertib in combination with other anti-cancer drugs (cisplatin, cetuximab, pemetrexed, fluorouracil or LY3023414) in participants with advanced cancer or cancer that has spread to another part of the body. The study has multiple parts (A, B, C, D and E). Participants will only enroll in one part.
Phase Ib / II study to determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose and Recommended Phase II Dose, and to evaluate the safety and antitumour activity, of BI 836845 and everolimus in combination with exemestane in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer
This clinical trial studies decitabine and cytarabine in treating older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome that is likely to come back or spread to other places in the body, or myeloproliferative neoplasm. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as decitabine and cytarabine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving decitabine and cytarabine may work better than standard therapies in treating cancers of the bone marrow and blood cells, such as acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative neoplasm.
To evaluate the Safety and Antitumor Activity of MEDI0680 (AMP-514) in Combination with Durvalumab versus Nivolumab Monotherapy in Participants with Select Advanced Malignancies.
The purpose of this study is to assess how the body handles Abemaciclib when it is given with another drug called clarithromycin. The study doctor will measure the amount of Abemaciclib that is absorbed into the blood stream and the time that it takes to remove Abemaciclib from the body. The safety and tolerability of these drugs will be studied. Each participant will complete 2 study periods in fixed order. After screening, Period 1 will last approximately 8 days and Period 2 will last approximately 15 days. Participants who complete Period 2 may continue to receive Abemaciclib in 28-day cycles until discontinuation criteria are met.
This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of talazoparib and temozolomide and to see how well they work in treating younger patients with tumors that have not responded to previous treatment (refractory) or have come back (recurrent). Talazoparib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving talazoparib together with temozolomide may work better in treating younger patients with refractory or recurrent malignancies.
This is a 4-stage, non-randomized, open-label, dose escalation and expansion, multicenter study. A cycle of therapy is 21 days. Stage 1 was a dose-escalation stage. During Stages 2-4, patients are treated at the MTD or maximum tested dose at which multiple DLTs are not observed during Stage 1.
The investigators hypothesize that response to kinase inhibitors is dependent on achieving pharmacological active drug levels in tumor tissue and that quantitative PET imaging can predict kinase inhibitors tumor concentrations. The ultimate aim is to develop a quantitative PET based imaging tool to differentiate between patients who will respond to therapy with kinase inhibitors. The main objective of this study is to determine whether tumor concentrations of kinase inhibitors at pharmacological active doses can be predicted from PET studies using tracer amounts (microdosing) of corresponding radiolabeled kinase inhibitors. This objective includes the development and validation of pharmacokinetic models for radiolabeled kinase inhibitors as well as validation of the microdosing concept for kinase inhibitors.