View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:Phase I/II open label, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MHB039A in advanced malignant tumors.
The present study will assess real-world clinical outcomes, adverse events and economics from treatment with endocrine therapy(ET) combined with abemaciclib in patients with hormone receptor-positive(HR+) breast cancer.
Phase I with a dose finding cohort, followed by expansion cohorts in pre-specified tumor types.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the value of the nurse's use of the Quality of Life (QoL) scores of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire [QLQ] C30 as an aid in identifying the needs for supportive oncological care at the start of care, in patients followed up for locally advanced or metastatic cancer starting systemic antineoplastic treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are as follows: - Comparison of the personalised oncology support care plans proposed by the nurse before and after the QoL results were obtained - The nurse's assessment of the relevance of the information provided by the QOL scores. During the Care Support Stage (CSS), the nurse will assess the patient's situation during the interview and will fill in directly on an electronic form the Oncological Support Care proposed to the patient, making up the Personalised Pre-QoL Oncological Support Care Plan (PPSOS pre-QoL). The nurse will then give the patient the tablet to fill in the QoL questionnaire. She will then look at the results of the QoL questionnaire and the alerts in the event of deterioration, and will reassess the PPSOS using a new computerised PPSOS post-QoL form. The nurse will assess the relevance of the information provided by the QoL scores concerning the urgency of care, the need to go into certain subjects in greater depth, the identification of problems not addressed before or the discussion of sensitive subjects not addressed before. The nurse will give the patient the tablet to fill in a satisfaction questionnaire. In an attempt to control the biases inherent in an assessment carried out by a single healthcare professional, the clinical records of the patients included will be presented to a group of professionals who will also propose a PPSOS, known as Experts. The group will be made up of a nurse, a medical oncologist and at least two healthcare professionals and professionals in a similar field (dietician, psychologist, APA teacher, social worker, etc.). This group will analyse all the patient files included in the two study centres at dedicated meetings. In order to characterise patient care following the CSS, the oncological support care performed, unscheduled hospitalisations, emergency room visits and calls to the on-call medical team will be collected for the two months following the CSS.
HS-20089 is an investigational antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized IgG1 anti-B7-H4 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a protease-cleavable linker, with an average drug-to-antibody ratio of about 6. This is a phase Ⅰ, open-label, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of HS-20089 in combination with other antitumor agents (Adebrelimab with or without platinum; Bevacizumab with or without platinum) in subjects with advanced solid tumors.
This is a first in human (FIH) 2-part study using ACTM-838 in patients with advanced solid tumors resistant to standard of care treatment. Part 1a will evaluate dose escalation and Part 1b will evaluate dose expansion.
The investigators will assess the use of a smart phone app to monitor patient reported outcomes and record biometric data in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.
HS-20093 is a fully humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) which specifically binds to B7-H3, a target wildly expressed on solid tumor cells. The objectives of this study are to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity of HS-20093 in combination with other anti-cancer agents in patients with advanced solid tumor patients.
Background: The issue of artificial hydration for terminal cancer patients is a classic ethical dilemma in palliative care. It is a common practice especially when patients are incapable of oral intake; however, there is a lack of research on indications and practices for the provision of artificial hydration to terminal cancer patients in Taiwan. The investigators aim to conduct a nationwide survey of palliative care physicians on their indications (general or specific), and practices of providing artificial hydration to terminal cancer patients. With that understanding of reasoning and clinical practice, the investigators would further establish an indigenous, evidence-based consensus guideline to serve as a reference for physicians in Taiwan. Methods: The study is comprised of two parts. The first part is to conduct a nationwide survey of palliative and oncology care specialists with a questionnaire designed from literature reviews and principles of clinical ethics. After validation of the questionnaire, the investigators will e-mail it to members of the Taiwan Academy of Hospice Palliative Medicine and the Taiwan Society of Cancer Palliative Medicine. The primary outcome measure of the study is the indication and clinical practice of artificial hydration, and the secondary outcome is factors associated with the administration or withdrawal of hydration. The second part is to establish a national consensus on clinical guidelines for administering artificial hydration, where the investigators will conduct a modified Delphi method for 6 rounds. Literature reviews will be first performed and 14 sessions of one-to-one interviews in Round 1 to develop a draft. Subsequent rounds comprise questionnaire surveys among all panelists, teleconferences and e-mail discussions among core members, and cancer patients/patients' family discussions. Statistical criteria include median and disagreement scores according to the Inter-Percentile Range Adjusted for Symmetry. Items voted for by 70% or more panelists will be selected and formalized into a consensus guideline. Expected results: The investigators hypothesize that the indication to administer artificial hydration to the terminal cancer patient is multi-factorial and culturally based. Conclusion: The establishment of a consensus guideline will help clinicians to make an appropriate decision from ethical, medical, cultural, and emotional factors and facilitate cancer patients to achieve a good quality of dying.
This will be a prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study to investigate the safety and efficacy of Bevacizumab (BEV) in combination with microbubble (MB)-mediated FUS in patients with recurrent GBM. BEV represents the physician's best choice for the standard of care (SoC) in rGBM after previous treatment with surgery (if appropriate), standard radiotherapy with temozolomide chemotherapy, and with adjuvant temozolomide.