Clinical Trials Logo

Myocardial Ischemia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Myocardial Ischemia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT01638078 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Thalidomide fOr the Prevention of Restenosis After Coronary ArtERy Stent Implantation

TOP RACER
Start date: January 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the use of bare metal stents is associated with restenosis in approximately 10% to 50% of cases. Stenting may induce endothelial damage/dysfunction and inflammatory reactions, which in turn delay healing and endothelialization and may lead to restenosis and atherosclerosis within the stented segments. The sedative and antinausea drug thalidomide has been shown to have both anti-inflammatory and antioncogenic properties that could be of benefit in case of PCI with stenting.

NCT ID: NCT01633359 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

The Association Between Very Small Embryonic-like Stem Cells and the Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease Patients

VSEL-CAD
Start date: July 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Hypothesis: Peripheral blood Very Small Embryonic-like Stem Cells (VSELs) are different in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients from those without CAD, which might account for the benefits of Atorvastatin in CAD patients.

NCT ID: NCT01567189 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Heart Disease

Cost-effectiveness of Outpatient Versus Hospital Cardiac Rehabilitation

CERC1
Start date: April 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The hypothesis is that home based clinical rehabilitation (CR) is less expensive than hospital based CR with similar clinical effectiveness. The investigators will compare the results of two forms of CR on 1. direct and indirect healthcare costs 2. effectiveness on mortality, morbidity, modifiable risk factors control, functional capacity measured by exercise testing, health related quality of life and satisfaction rate 3. cost/effectiveness analysis

NCT ID: NCT01555658 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Bivalirudin Plus Stenting in Long Lesion to Avoid Periprocedural Myocardial Necrosis Trial

BILLION
Start date: April 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Background: Randomized trials show improved outcomes among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with Bivalirudin1. Optimal antithrombotic treatment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is crucial to balance the risk of post-PCI bleeding versus ischemic complications2. Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor has been extensively investigated as an intra-procedural antithrombotic therapy in patients with stable angina, Non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Bivalirudin, when used with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) during PCI has been found to be superior to Unfractionated heparin (UFH) with or without GPI in reducing 30-day bleeding complications without significant increase in the rate of ischemic events3-5. Moreover,after otherwise successful PCI,an increase in cardiac biomarkers has been shown to occur in 5% to 30% of patients6. Recent studies have focused their attention onthe reduction of infarct size and the incidence of periprocedural (type IVa) myocardial infarction (PMI)after elective PCI7-8. Therefore, we will perform a single-center, prospective and randomized study to assess if Bivalirudin versus UFHis effective in preventing elevation of biomarkers of MI after coronary stent implantation in patients already treated with aspirin and clopidogrel,with anatomically complex lesion. Objective: to assess the safety and efficacy of routine usage of the Bivalirudin vs UFH in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), after stent implantation in coronary long lesions, to avoid periprocedural myocardial necrosis. Setting: Single-center, spontaneous, prospective, randomized 1:1 study of Bivalirudin infusion vs UFH in the setting of CAD, after PCI with stenting incoronary long lesions. Comparison: Bivalirudin vs UFH, in preventing elevation of biomarkers of MI after coronary stent implantation in patients already treated with aspirin and clopidogrel, with anatomically complex lesion. Population:Patients with diffuse CAD undergoing percutaneous treatment on a native coronary vessel with planned implantation stents in overlapping with a total stent length >33 mm for long coronary lesions in vessels with a reference vessel diameter 2.25-4.0 mm. Assessment Following the procedure, blood samples for CK, CK-MB and Troponin will be collected at 6,12 and 24 h post PCI. CK-MB values will be considered abnormal if they will elevate above the upper limit of normal (ULN). This is set at 6 mg/L by our local laboratory. If the first blood sample showed a CK-MB level ≥18 mg/L (≥3 times upper normal limit), a second blood sample would be drawn every 8 h later until a downward trend will be observed. For patients with two or more blood samples drawn, the peak CK-MB level will be used for analysis. End-points: The primary end-point of this study will be the incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis that was defined as a peak post-procedural CK-MB elevation > 1 time the upper limit of normal (ULN) alone or associated with chest pain or ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities, in patients undergoing non-urgent PCI. Secondary end-points will be the rate of MACCE (major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events, ie the composite of death, myocardial infarction [defined according to the Academic Research Consortium statement], target vessel revascularization or stroke), the rate of major bleedings (Bleeding Academic Consortium [BARC] 3-5), minor bleedings (BARC 2), and the rate of NACE (net adverse clinical events, ie the composite of MACCE and major bleedings) at 30 days, 6 and 12 month follow-up. Adverse events will be determined by telephone interview and/or medical record review. Clinical follow-up: telephone-based interviews and office-based direct visits will be performed at 1, 6 and 12 months, respectively, for end-point adjudication. Sample size and statistical analysis: Given an expected rate of abnormal post-procedural peak CK-MB > 1 x ULM of 48% (based on results of the INSTANT trial) for the control group and 29% for the experimental group (thus a 40% relative risk reduction), aiming for a 0.05 alpha and 0.80 power, a total of 204 patients will need to be enrolled (102 patients per group).

NCT ID: NCT01553513 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

PET/CT for the Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation

QAEK
Start date: June 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

This is a single-centre prospective trial with 140 patients employing [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and advance motion correction and image fusion algorithms to create motion frozen displays and quantify FDG-uptake and thus inflammatory activity in atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary tree. Four groups of patients, two with stable coronary artery disease and two with acute coronary syndrome will be compared and the results of FDG PET/CT will be correlated to results of invasive coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound / virtual histology, patient risk profile and serum markers of inflammation. The investigators hypothesize that increased FDG accumulation in atherosclerotic plaques shows a positive correlation with inflammatory activity in coronary plaques and markers of plaque vulnerability as well as the risk profile of the patients and serum markers of inflammation. The investigators furthermore hypothesize that FDG PET/CT is able to detect high risk patients and provide an important means for risk stratification and optimization of patient management.

NCT ID: NCT01534221 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Ischemic Heart Disease

The COOPerative Establishment for Necessary Investigation in Clinical Outcome After Stenting

COPERNICOS
Start date: March 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The superiority of a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by one stent over another in terms of clinical outcome is usually documented in large randomized controlled trials (RCT). Although generated from selected study populations these data form the basis for evidence based practice (EBP) in the entire population of patients considered for coronary intervention. An inherent limitation of this approach is that study populations differ significantly from all comers in terms of patient characteristics and prognosis undermining the foundation for extrapolation of trial results to all comers. Furthermore, other trials are based on a "one-fits-all" concept, while the benefits of an "individual-tailored" approach that might be superior, is not investigated. The Purpose of the current study is to - Compare clinical outcome between several CE marked drug eluting stents - Compare clinical outcome between several CE marked bare metal stents - Compare clinical outcome in all comers with that of the selected study population of RCT's - Evolve methods to compare clinical outcomes between the generalized "one-fits-all" versus the individualized or "individual-tailored" stent selection approaches The Method employed is - All comer PCI registry - single centre - Randomisation of all eligible patients within the registry to one of several study stent - Quality assurance in non-randomized population within the registry by periodical alternating the institutional standard stent - Continuous follow up of all patients included the registry by means of systematic event detection and classification by an independent safety and end point committee - Assessment of effects on quality of life by heart and health questionnaires Outcome Measures Primary endpoints: - Composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infraction and target vessel revascularisation - Stent thrombosis - A specifically developed Treatment Failure Rate classification Secondary outcome measures include each of the above, target lesion revascularisation and total death analyzed in a hierarchical fashion at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. Tertiary outcome measure is self reported quality of life based on health questionnaires on general health and cardiac symptoms. Power Calculations An event rate of 20% within 5 years, a relative difference of 25% (an absolute difference of 5%), P< 5%, Power > 80% => 900 patients in each of two treatment arms. Prespecified Analysis include 1. The MACE rates between stent types 2. The Stent thrombosis rates between stent types 3. The Treatment failure rates between stent types 4. The randomized population versus non-randomized population 5. The individualized versus the generalized Population 6. QOL between stent types

NCT ID: NCT01499316 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Investigating the Effects of Hyperoxia on Fractional Flow Reserve

Start date: March 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a condition which refers to the narrowing of the small blood vessels that supplies blood and oxygen to the heart. It is a common cause of chest-pain related symptoms and as a result of a 'heart attack'. In most cases, to assess the severity of the disease is to use coronary angiography, which is a medical imaging technique that uses contrast (a dye) and x-ray to show the blood-flow supply of the coronary arteries. The optimal treatment for patients with symptomatic coronary disease is aggressive medical therapy. Current guidelines recommend patients with symptomatic CAD and severe disease on angiography undergo revascularisation therapy, which aims to restore blood flow to blocked arteries. This can be done by either percutaneous coronary intervention (feeding a small balloon or other device on a thin tube through blood vessels to the point of blockage and then inflate the balloon to open the artery), or coronary artery bypass grafting (open-heart surgery)2. For many symptomatic patients who have only moderate disease on angiography, further functional testing is required to assess the extent of the blockage. This can be achieved by placing a pressure wire to the artery of interest, to determine the likelihood that the blockage impedes oxygen delivery to the heart muscle, known as the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)3. FFR is commonly performed at the Alfred hospital in the assessment of such patients. During an FFR procedure, further information regarding the health of the small arteries of the heart can be obtained with the calculation of the index of micro-vascular resistance (IMR), Giving oxygen to patients with CAD is a common clinical practice, especially to all patients in the catheterisation laboratory whose had a 'heart attack' and often administered concurrently with light sedation during elective procedures. Recently, however, the safety of routine supplemental oxygen in patients with CAD has been questioned5. A research study analysed the outcomes of three small randomised studies on oxygen in patients who experienced a 'heart attack', while suggestive of harm, the findings of the study remain inconclusive. There may also be deleterious effects of supplemental oxygen, on more stable patients with CAD, who are not experiencing a 'heart attack'. Supplemental oxygen administered in the catheterisation laboratory to patients with stable CAD, has been shown to significantly reduce coronary artery blood flow and increase its resistance6-8. It has also been shown to reduce cardiac output and effect the relaxation phase of the heart cycle. Based on this data it is hypothesised that supplemental oxygen may affect FFR in patients with moderate CAD. The investigators therefore propose to undertake a study of the effects of supplemental oxygen on FFR in patients with moderate CAD. The patients enrolled into the study will be scheduled for an elective normal contrast diagnostic or interventional procedure as part of their clinically-indicated care. Once a moderate blockage of the artery has been identified, FFR and IMR will be measured. During the first phase of the FFR study, the patient will breathe room air and have a blood test to measure their oxygen level (blood gas). There is a 3 minute washout period, followed by the second phase, whereby the patient will be given 100% oxygen for 10 minutes and have another blood gas measured. The study will be conducted at Alfred Hospital with a total enrollment of 18 subjects. The estimated time to complete enrollment is 6-10 months. Data collected on each patient will include demographics, medical history, vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, height, and weight), usage of cardiovascular medications, pathology results and procedural records. Any adverse events or serious adverse events related to the study procedure will also be recorded.

NCT ID: NCT01495520 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Ischemic Heart Disease

Ranolazine for Improving Symptoms of Palpitations

RYPPLE
Start date: January 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Patients with ischemic heart disease often report multiple symptoms, including angina and palpitations. Ranolazine has antiarrhythmic effects which are largely a result of the drug's effect on multiple ion channels. It remains unknown, however, whether the favorable effects of ranolazine on symptoms and arrhythmias are maintained over time. Aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that chronic treatment with ranolazine can improve the symptomatic status of patients with ischemic heart disease by reducing the occurrence of palpitations.

NCT ID: NCT01491243 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

N-GAL Allows Intensive Treatment of Contrast Induced Nephropathy

NEW-MOON
Start date: January 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Patients who undergo urgent/emergency coronary angiography can not receive any preventive treatment of contrast induced nephropathy. We tested the hypothesis that Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a new biomarker predictive for AKI, allows early and effective treatment of contrast induced nephropathy in patients with urgent/emergency coronary angiography

NCT ID: NCT01491061 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

Ranolazine Loading to Prevent PCI-induced Myocardial Injury

TWILIGHT
Start date: January 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

It has previously been shown that pretreatment with ranolazine 1,000 mg twice daily for 7 days can significantly reduce procedural myocardial injury in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The investigators tested the hypothesis that twice overnight high-dose ranolazine loading before PCI can reduce the peri-procedural myocardial ischemic damage similarly to long-term pre-treatment with standard doses.