View clinical trials related to Musculoskeletal Pain.
Filter by:This study aims to assess whether there is an association between students' lifestyle behaviour, in terms of physical activity level, sleep duration, smoking status, alcohol consumption and use of cannabis and other illegal drugs, and later health care utilisation due to musculoskeletal pain. The study will combine data from a national survey in Norway (SHOT2018), in which all full-time university students in Norway were invited, with data from a register on health care utilisation in primary health care.
The goals of this study are - To define what the public perceptions of persistent pain using a national survey - Explore relationships between the reported pubic beliefs and demographic factors collected. - To evaluate the impact of a public health campaign to increase awareness of persistent pain and develop understanding of pain that aligns with contemporary science.
The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of integrating neural mobilization techniques into a multimodal physical exercise program for older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the average time to assess secondary outcomes for each participant? - What proportion of participants adhered and/or withdrew from the study at the end of the intervention protocol? - Are there adverse events/effects associated with the intervention protocol? - What is the level of approval/satisfaction of the participants in relation to the assessment and intervention protocols? - What is the impact of the intervention protocol on participants´ pain, function, physical performance, somatosensory function, and nerve excursion (secondary outcomes)? Participants will be assessed at 3 different moments: initial assessment (T0), at the end of the intervention protocol (8 weeks) (T1) and 3 months after the end of the intervention protocol (T2). The intervention protocol will consist of a multimodal exercise program (with or without integration of neural mobilization techniques) to be carried out over a period of 8 weeks at a frequency of twice a week.
The goal of this project is to conduct a randomized, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial (N=200) to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 10-week mind-body and walking program (GetActive+) vs treatment as usual (TAU). The investigators will test for improvements in self-reported, performance-based (i.e., six-minute walk test), and objective (i.e., step-count) physical function, emotional function, as well as feasibility, acceptability and implementation markers. Participants will complete measures at baseline, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up.
Treatment options for chronic non-oncologic musculoskeletal pain are varied and include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, such as physical activity and psychotherapy. In clinical practice, the prevalent approach is pharmacological, based mainly on the use of pain modulators, such as antidepressants, cannabinoids and anti-epileptics, and on the use of traditional painkillers such as NSAIDs and opioids. In particular, the latter are still widely prescribed in clinical practice. Initially very effective in combating fibromyalgia pain, opioids, when taken chronically, lead to the development of tolerance with the need for the patient to gradually increase the dosage or switch to more powerful active drugs to obtain the same effect. In the face of fleeting and limited benefits, the risk, therefore, is that of falling back into a framework of abuse with consequent negative impact on both health and social status. In this context, the non-pharmacological approach plays a role of primary importance. In particular, exercise is currently recommended as one of the most effective management strategies. However, the implementation of exercise as a treatment for chronic pain is significantly hampered by poor patient compliance. Another non-pharmacological strategy is biofeedback (BF); however, although existing data support the use of BF, in clinical practice the results obtained have not supported expectations. A solution to these limitations could come from virtual reality (VR), an innovative method capable of simulating real-world situations and cognitive and motor tasks in a safe and stimulating environment, making the completion of activities rewarding and benefiting all those patients who need motor rehabilitation or musculoskeletal pain management. This is a single-center interventional randomized device-controlled study, with two study arms: - The treatment group: subjected to 5 days of VR experience and subsequently monitored using questionnaires until the 15th day after the end of the experience. - The control group: initially placed on hold and subsequently also subjected to 5 days of VR experience only when the treatment group has finished its shift; subsequently each patient will be monitored until the 15th day after the end of the experience. Primary endpoint: - Demonstration of a pain reduction of at least 30% according to the VAS scale (0-100) in patients undergoing VR compared to those not undergoing VR. Inclusion criteria - Patients aged 30-50 years who complain of chronic musculoskeletal pain lasting at least three months, without diagnosis of inflammatory causes Exclusion criteria - Concomitant diagnosis of major psychiatric pathologies with the exception of anxiety-depressive disorder; - Concomitant diagnosis of neurological pathologies; - Concomitant diagnosis of inflammatory rheumatological diseases that may cause chronic pain. Statistical analysis On the basis of the primary endpoints set, it is planned to enroll a sample of 20 patients, 10 per treatment group, considering an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Considering a dropout of approximately 2 patients, a final sample of 24 patients is considered, 12 for each group. Comparisons between the two groups of patients will be performed using parametric or non-parametric statistical tests, based on the distribution of the variables, using the Student or Mann-Whitney t test for continuous variables, and Chi-square or Fischer, for variable dichotomous or ordinal. Any correlations will be determined through the calculation of the Odds Ratio.
Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) and lack of physical activity often co-exist, contributing to increased disability, non-communicable diseases (e.g., obesity, diabetes, hypertension), psychological comorbidity (e.g., anxiety and depression), and healthcare utilization and costs [1-6]. Many individuals with CMP seek assistance at emergency departments (ED). ED overuse has been an ongoing concern, with 1-in-5 Americans presenting to the ED at least once each year [7]. Of these visits, 24 million are for adults seeking help for chronic pain, with an additional 12 million due to exacerbations of an existing chronic pain condition [8]. In 2021, the fourth most common reason for seeking care in the ED related to a primary diagnosis involving the musculoskeletal system, with an estimated 9.5 million visits [9]. Most ED visits result in a 'treat and release' approach, potentially disrupting continuity of care and resulting in follow-up ED visits [10]. These ED visits for chronic pain are indicative of accessibility problems to community-based primary and preventative care, compounded by limited or no health insurance coverage [10]. Based on the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, EDs are required to stabilize all patients regardless of ability to pay [10]. To alleviate the burden of CMP on patients and EDs, improve access to quality healthcare, and mitigate initial and repeat ED visits, alternative options are required. Here we propose a novel group-based intervention involving pain education (PE) and physical activity (PA) implemented in CMP patients presenting to the ED of a community level hospital. The investigators will recruit 60 adults from a community hospital located in the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia; participants will be randomized to either Pain Education and Active Knowledge (P.E.A.K.) Rx (24 sessions of group PE+ + PA) or usual care. Research assessments are conducted with both groups at study entry (baseline), 8-weeks, 3-months, and 6-months.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of managing low acuity musculoskeletal complaints in children and adolescents ages 6 to 17.99 years in the pediatric emergency department. The main question it aims to answer is whether delivering care in two methods is feasible. Participants will receive care while in the emergency department and will be followed for a period of 1-month post-presentation.
Pain is one of the main complaints that causes people to apply to health institutions. Pain is seen as a passive warning signal of an underlying disease process; When it becomes chronic, it is considered a disease on its own. Pain that persists longer than the expected recovery time is defined as chronic pain. Pain is associated with a number of psychological, physical, and social factors. Clinical observations report that various psychological problems, especially anxiety, and depression, accompany chronic pain, and the long-term persistence of pain significantly impacts a patient's quality of life. Chronic musculoskeletal pain causes fatigue, sleep disruption, and activity and participation restrictions. Therefore, evaluation of pain originating from the musculoskeletal system and factors that cause and increase pain need to be addressed from a biopsychosocial perspective. Chronic pain is an ideal environment for anxiety to develop. If the person's chronic pain cannot be resolved, anxiety increases and the anxiety becomes excessive, the person may lose the ability to distinguish what is dangerous from what is not, as he cannot evaluate pain-related cues properly. Anxiety and depression scales are often used to assess the long-term psychosocial consequences of chronic musculoskeletal pain. However, these scales are inadequate to explain the relationship between pain and anxiety. The Worry About Pain Questionnaire is a self-report scale of 15 items specifically developed to assess pain-related pressure. To our knowledge, there is no standard, valid, and reliable Turkish questionnaire in the literature that evaluates the pain-related concerns of individuals with musculoskeletal pain and takes into account the cultural differences of Turkish patients. For this reason, our study aims to translate and culturally adapt the Worry About Pain Questionnaire into Turkish in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain and to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish Worry About Pain Questionnaire.
The purpose of this research is to find out if different types of anxiety impact the sensation of how sensitive various muscles are to the application of pressure. This information can help researchers and healthcare providers better understand how people feel pain differently based on emotional factors This study is designed to study people who can be expected to have normal pain sensation processing
The purpose of the project is to investigate if the use of virtual reality (VR) technology with pre-programmed proprietary software can provide better treatment for patients with long-term pain conditions. This is investigated in this pilot study conducted on patients referred to outpatient treatment at the Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The pilot study will lay the foundation for a follow-up study (RCT). The effect of VR are evaluated by patient reporting forms; before start-up and 3 months after startup. Patients included in the study receive standard treatment supplemented with the use of VR technology. The therapists involved will be Interviewed to examine their experiences with the use of the VR-technology in the treatment of patients. VR technology can potentially contribute to better treatment (e.g. measured in outcomes such as activity, sleep problems, pain intensity, quality of life). Moreover we expect that a VR-assisted treatment to be more cost-effective and increased availability regardless of geography and demography.