View clinical trials related to Musculoskeletal Pain.
Filter by:This single-site study of self-hypnosis software using an off-the-shelf virtual reality (VR) device (OculusGo™) to determine the software's safety, usability, and preliminary efficacy in pain relief for HIV-associated chronic pain patients. This is funded under the i Prism Funding through Mount Sinai Innovations.
This is a trial to measure the effectiveness and safety of the invisa-RED® IR REHAB device. The researchers will compare the muscle and joint pain relief of participants who are treated with the real machine, to those treated with a non-working "look-a-like" device. If there is a significant difference of pain relief between those treated with the real machine and those treated with the 'look-a-like' device and no safety issues are discovered, the researchers will be able to assume the IR REHAB device is safe and effective for the treatment of muscle and joint pain.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about musculoskeletal pain, functionality, and risk of falls in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What are the characteristics of a community-dwelling population over 60 years and older in terms of musculoskeletal pain, functionality, and risk of falls? - Does an intervention with virtual reality lower musculoskeletal pain, raise functionality and prevent falls in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older, compared to a control group that does not receive such intervention? Participants will: - Answer questionnaires. - Perform physical laboratory tests through a camera-based motion capture system. - Execute task-based exercises in a virtual environment through virtual reality. Researchers will compare community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older who execute task based exercises in a virtual environment through virtual reality and community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older without any intervention to see if virtual reality improves musculoskeletal pain, functionality, and lowers fall risk.
This study aims to determine the relationship between upper extremity pathologies and demographic data, duration of manual wheelchair use, duration of injury, physical examination and musculoskeletal ultrasound measurements in patients with spinal cord injuries.
The goal of this project is to conduct a randomized, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial (N=200) to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 10-week mind-body and walking program (GetActive+) vs treatment as usual (TAU). The investigators will test for improvements in self-reported, performance-based (i.e., six-minute walk test), and objective (i.e., step-count) physical function, emotional function, as well as feasibility, acceptability and implementation markers. Participants will complete measures at baseline, post-intervention and 6-month follow-up.
Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) and lack of physical activity often co-exist, contributing to increased disability, non-communicable diseases (e.g., obesity, diabetes, hypertension), psychological comorbidity (e.g., anxiety and depression), and healthcare utilization and costs [1-6]. Many individuals with CMP seek assistance at emergency departments (ED). ED overuse has been an ongoing concern, with 1-in-5 Americans presenting to the ED at least once each year [7]. Of these visits, 24 million are for adults seeking help for chronic pain, with an additional 12 million due to exacerbations of an existing chronic pain condition [8]. In 2021, the fourth most common reason for seeking care in the ED related to a primary diagnosis involving the musculoskeletal system, with an estimated 9.5 million visits [9]. Most ED visits result in a 'treat and release' approach, potentially disrupting continuity of care and resulting in follow-up ED visits [10]. These ED visits for chronic pain are indicative of accessibility problems to community-based primary and preventative care, compounded by limited or no health insurance coverage [10]. Based on the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, EDs are required to stabilize all patients regardless of ability to pay [10]. To alleviate the burden of CMP on patients and EDs, improve access to quality healthcare, and mitigate initial and repeat ED visits, alternative options are required. Here we propose a novel group-based intervention involving pain education (PE) and physical activity (PA) implemented in CMP patients presenting to the ED of a community level hospital. The investigators will recruit 60 adults from a community hospital located in the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia; participants will be randomized to either Pain Education and Active Knowledge (P.E.A.K.) Rx (24 sessions of group PE+ + PA) or usual care. Research assessments are conducted with both groups at study entry (baseline), 8-weeks, 3-months, and 6-months.
This study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled research design. This study takes classic NSAIDs treatment as a control, and it will take patients' pain relief, functional improvement, sleep quality improvement, and adverse reactions as the main and secondary evaluation indicators to explore the safety and effectiveness of weak laser treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain, determining the dominant disease in the treatment of Chronic pain.
Our proposal objective is to evaluate if state-regulated topical CBD-based products relieve chronic musculoskeletal pain and/or absorb into the bloodstream.
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether patients who benefit from a personalized pharmaceutical plan (PPP) during their hospitalization, allowing them to be informed and sensitized, are treated for a shorter period of time with strong opioids with a reduced risk of dependence compared to a management according to the usual modalities in the rheumatology services concerned.
The new approach in pain neuroscience education (PNE) requires specific training for the physiotherapists in charge of applying it. In recent years, public and private initiatives have offered training in different formats, online courses, face to face courses, congresses, that have facilitated access to this knowledge for many professionals. However, this offer lacks a sufficiently deep approach, so that physiotherapists do not develop the necessary skills to put it into practice, in addition to being an area of knowledge in which the concepts need constant updating given the rapid scientific progress. As with any paradigm shift, there is resistance to change on the part of some professionals, but the extent to which this has a collective impact on the generalization of these interventions is unknown. From our point of view, lack of training is only one of the aspects that hinder the implementation of PNE. Working conditions (pressure of care, high physiotherapist/population ratios, limited time available) and organizational conditions (dependence on hospital services, lack of vision of this model by the PC team) could be among the main daily difficulties in implementing it. The main objective of this study is to detect the barriers and facilitators that primary care physiotherapists have to implement programmes based on the new paradigm of pain neuroscience in the treatment of patients with chronic pain.