View clinical trials related to Lung Diseases, Obstructive.
Filter by:Many exercise tests are commonly used to evaluate the changes of exercise tolerance following rehabilitation programs in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Among the tests (6-MWT, incremental test, ...), the literature seems to indicate that endurance time is the most responsive parameter for detecting and quantifying changes in exercise capacity following a rehabilitation program. Although its clinical interest is undeniable, the endurance shuttle walking test is rarely used because it requires the prior performance of two incremental shuttle walking tests to determine the walking speed imposed on the patient. In this protocol, we propose to test a Walk-Time Limit Test (WTLT) derived from the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) and based on the average walking speed achieved in this test commonly used in the follow-up of patients with chronic diseases. TTLM validation would improve the functional assessment of patients with chronic diseases while limiting the number of exercise tests.
In COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, the prognosis is poor and the treatment with non invasive ventilation is actually well established. However the best mode of ventilation is not well known. In severe COPD patients various disorders of respiratory mechanics result in insufficient ventilation, which can be life-threatening or create NIV discomfort. The main characteristic of these disorders is a cyclical closing of small airways that can limit an expiratory flow and provoked some fluctuations in flow curve. To our knowledge, the management of dynamic hyperinflation seems to play an important role in explaining the effect of the NIV. Few studies have examined the effects of the machine's adjustments on dynamic hyperinflation. The main objective of this study is to analyze the impact of specific ventilatory modes supposed to reduce the dynamic hyperinflation on the hematosis, by studying transcutaneous pressure of carbon dioxide, in severe hypercapnic COPD patients ventilated by NIV. Two modes of ventilation will be compared. First one is an algorithmic mode developed by the company Löwenstein (AirTrap Control, Trigger Lockout and the Expiratory Pressure Ramp). The second one is a standard algorithmic mode, used in the same ventilator. These two ventilatory modes will be evaluated in each patient, during two consecutive nights in current living conditions at home.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of disability and mortality worldwide. This systemic disease progressively leads to dyspnea and exercise capacity impairment. Pulmonary rehabilitation effectively improves exercise capacity, dyspnea and quality of life in patients with COPD. However, its benefits progressively fade over time due to several factors such as the lack of regular exercise activity, dyspnea, airway secretions, hematosis impairment and acute exacerbations which can lead to hospitalization and accelerated muscle wasting. Nasal high flow (NHF) is a support used to deliver heated and humidified high flow air (up to 60 L/min) through nasal canula providing promising physiological benefits such as positive airway pressure or upper airway carbon dioxide washout. It can be used in association with oxygen and offers the advantage to overtake the patient's inspiratory flow, providing a stable inspired fraction of oxygen. Nasal high flow has widely been studied in pediatric and adult intensive care units and seems better than conventional oxygen therapy and as effective as noninvasive ventilation with regards to mortality to treat hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. More recently, several studies have shown that long-term nasal high flow could contribute to improve exercise capacity, dyspnea, airway secretion removal, hematosis, reduced acute exacerbations and subsequent hospitalizations in patients with COPD. Based on these results, the primary aim of this study is to assess whether long-term nasal high flow treatment can help COPD patients to better maintain their endurance capacity following a course of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Scientific research focuses on "eosinophilic inflammation" as it seems to guide the therapeutic regimen in patients with asthma and COPD. The primary objective of this prospective trial is to evaluate which parameter(s) best reflects eosinophilic inflammation by correlating tissue eosinophils (endobronchial biopsy, protected specimen brush sampling) with FeNO, peripheral blood eosinophils, and eosinophils in the bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with obstructive pulmonary disease.
Patients with COPD exacerbation usually need respiratory support after extubation. Recently, HHHFNC has been used in both adult and neonates with post-extubation respiratory support. Studies indicate that HHHFNC has seminar efficacy compared to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation and superior than conventional oxygen therapy. There are no clinical data of diaphragm electrical activity and cardiopulmonary function for using HHHFNC and UHFOM as post-extubation respiratory support.
This was an exploratory, randomized, subject- and investigator-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, proof-of-mechanism study of multiple oral doses of fevipiprant (QAW039) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with eosinophilia.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the lung deposition and distribution pattern of TRIMBOW using a Gamma-scintigraphic technique after inhalation of a single dose of 99mTc radiolabelled TRIMBOW administered via pMDI in healthy volunteers, asthmatic and COPD patients
This open-label study will evaluate the safety of continued therapy with inhaled treprostinil in participants who have completed Study RIN-PH-304 (NCT03496623). This study hypothesizes that long-term safety findings will be similar to those observed in the randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, adaptive study 'A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Adaptive Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Treprostinil in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)(RIN-PH-304).
COPD is a major public health problem and will shortly become the third most common cause of global mortality. There are currently no treatments that can meaningfully alter the progression of COPD or the time to death. Consequently novel therapeutic strategies for COPD are urgently required. This will be a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial of Epstein-Barr virus suppression in COPD. Participants will be randomised to receive valaciclovir 1 gram three times daily for 8 weeks or matching placebo. The study will measure EBV suppression using quantitative PCR. Secondary outcomes will include Lung function quality of life and drug tolerability. The exploratory analysis will evaluate biomarkers of airway inflammation within the sputum and blood.
Background: To effectively alleviate suffering and improve quality of life for patients with serious illness and their caregivers, palliative care (PC) services must be offered across multiple settings. Research is needed to determine how best to optimize home-based palliative care (HBPC) services to meet the needs of individuals with high symptom burden and functional limitations. Aim: The investigators will compare a standard HBPC model that includes routine home visits by a nurse and provider with a more efficient tech-supported HBPC model that promotes timely inter-professional team coordination via synchronous video consultation with the provider while the nurse is in the patient's home. The investigators hypothesize that tech-supported HBPC will be as effective as standard HBPC. Design: Cluster randomized trial. Registered nurses (n~130) will be randomly assigned to the tech-supported or standard HBPC model so that half of the patient-caregiver dyads will receive one of the two models. Setting/Participants: Kaiser Permanente (15 Southern California and Oregon sites). Patients (n=10,000) with any serious illness and a prognosis of 1-2 years and their caregivers (n=4,800) Methods: Patients and caregivers will receive standard PC services: comprehensive needs assessment and care planning, pain and symptom management, education/skills training, medication management, emotional/spiritual support; care coordination, referral to other services, and 24/7 phone assistance. Results: Primary patient outcomes: symptom improvement at 1 month and days spent at home in the last six months of life; caregiver outcome: perception of preparedness for caregiving. Conclusion: Should the more efficient tech-supported HBPC model achieves comparable improvements in outcomes that matter most to patients and caregivers, this would have a lasting impact on PC practice and policy.