View clinical trials related to Lumbar Spine Surgery.
Filter by:In recent years, regional anesthesia techniques have also been frequently applied to patients for pain relief. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), is among the regional anesthesia techniques frequently used in lumbar spine surgery. General anesthesia (GA) is the main method of anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery. However, GA can only inhibit the projection system of the cortical limbic system or hypothalamic cortex. GA cannot completely block the transmission of peripheral noxious stimulus to the central nervous system and cannot effectively inhibit the intraoperative stress response. With the addition of peripheral blocks such as ESPB, lower remifentanil consumption, and more stable hemodynamics are expected by providing preemptive analgesia in patients. As a result of all these; it was aimed to compare the intraoperative remifentanil consumption of patients who underwent preoperative ESPB in patients who will undergo lumbar spine surgery resection under GA with those who underwent postoperative ESPB.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the BrightPoint Epidural device as the first system to use multispectral reflectometry to find the epidural space in lumbar neuraxial procedures requiring epidural needle. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the device a qualitatively effective secondary confirmation of Loss of Resistance? 2. Is the device a qualitatively effective training tool for educating trainees in how to perform lumbar epidurals? Participants will undergo a neuraxial procedure in which the attending anesthesiologist will use the BrightPoint epidural device to form an opinion on its effectiveness in confirming epidural space access.
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to compare two behavioral interventions for patients who are recovering from lumbar spinal surgery for a degenerative spine condition. The study aims to answer the following questions: 1. Is it feasible and acceptable to deliver the interventions and conduct the study procedures in this patient population? 2. Do the interventions benefit patients with regard to pain-related, functional, opioid use, and psychosocial outcomes at 3 and 6 months after surgery, and does one intervention have more benefit than the other? Participants will be asked to do the following: 1. Complete self-report questionnaires online before spine surgery, and around 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after spine surgery. 2. Complete a sensory pain task before spine surgery, and around 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after spine surgery. 3. Around two weeks after surgery, participants will be randomly assigned by chance to one of two behavioral interventions - Mindfulness or Education. Participants will then be asked to attend 8, weekly sessions with a study treatment coach over telehealth (online with camera and microphone).
Digital technologies could reduce the length of hospital stay and improve post-operative recuperation after discharge by offering a remote follow-up. No study has investigated the effects of connected follow-up on lumbar spine inpatients. The purpose of this project is to assess the effects of connected follow-up on pain and quality of life after lumbar spine surgery.
The aim of this double blind randomized study will be to investigate the effect of an opioid-free anesthesia regimen with a mixture of dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-ketamine in the same syringe versus remifentanil analgesia in lumbar spine surgery
This study focused on examining the effect of mobilization protocol assisted with simulated clinical immersion videos on postoperative pain, fear of movement, mobility level and satisfaction in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
The primary purpose of this study is to assess whether lumbar spine surgery patients with dura rupture differ in symptom prevalence and severity from other lumbar spine surgery patients in the early postoperative phase. This is in order to develop a symptom-specific mobilization algorithm (DURAMOB) that can be used to assess whether patients with dura rupture safe can be mobilized earlier after lumbar back surgery to prevent bed rest complications
Lumbar spine pain is the leading cause of years lived with a disability and affects over 50 million individuals in the United States. Rates of spine surgeries performed to address degenerative spine conditions have increased markedly. A subset of patients experience poor pain, functional, or quality of life outcomes after surgery. This study will adapt and evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of both a one-on-one and a group-delivered, face-to-face telehealth, mindfulness intervention for patients recovering from lumbar spine surgery. The goals of the intervention are to improve short and long-term pain management, reduce the need for long-term pain medications, and improve physical and psychological well-being after surgery. The study will result in a refined intervention manual based on feasibility, participant exit interviews and satisfaction surveys which will be piloted in a future randomized controlled trial.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks after lumbar and lumbo-sacral spine surgery by assessing postoperative pain scores and opiate requirements as the primary outcome measures. We are aiming to investigate how ESP blocks, performed under ultrasound guidance at the T12 vertebral level, contribute to postoperative pain control. This will be determined by measuring numerical rating pain scores repeatedly following surgery and opiate consumption until patient discharge from hospital. These primary outcome measures will be compared between a treatment group of participants, who will receive ESP blocks and a control group who will receive a sham block. Our primary hypothesis is that ESP blocks significantly reduce postoperative pain and opiate requirements
By doing this study, researchers hope to learn effects of Vit C on lumbar spine surgery outcomes.