View clinical trials related to Ischemic Stroke.
Filter by:There are over 7 million stroke survivors in the US alone, with approximately 795,000 new cases annually. Despite the best available physiotherapy, 30-60% of stroke survivors remain affected by difficulty walking, with foot weakness often being the main cause. Given that post-stroke gait impairments remain poorly addressed, new methods that can provide lasting improvements are necessary. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology may be one such novel approach. BCI technology enables "direct brain control" of external devices such as assistive devices and prostheses by translating brain waves into control signals. When BCI systems are integrated with functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems, they can be used to deliver a novel physical therapy to improve movement after stroke. BCI-FES systems are hypothesized to stimulate recovery after stroke beyond that of conventional physical therapy.
This is an expanded access program (EAP) for eligible participants. This program is designed to provide access to Elezanumab prior to approval by the local regulatory agency. Availability will depend on territory eligibility. A medical doctor must decide whether the potential benefit outweighs the risk of receiving an investigational therapy based on the individual patient's medical history and program eligibility criteria.
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has the characteristics of high morbidity, high mortality, high disability rate and high recurrence rate. Progressive cerebral infarction (PIS) is a subtype of AIS, accounting for 10% - 40%. Because of the gradual aggravation of neurological deficit symptoms, it has a higher rate of disability and death, which brings heavy mental and economic burden to families, society and the country. The progress of acute cerebral infarction is generally within 6 hours to 1 week after the onset of the disease. At present, it is considered that thrombus prolongation is one of the important pathogenesis of PIS. Heparin can reduce the incidence of post-stroke embolism, but its benefits are offset by the risk of hemorrhage due to the high risk of hemorrhage. The 2013AHA guidelines in the United States do not recommend it as a routine anticoagulant therapy. Therefore, reducing the risk of bleeding is the key to the anticoagulation therapy of PIS. Argatroban is a new thrombin inhibitor. Its mechanism of action is to bind and inactivate thrombin (factor Ⅱ a) directly.Compared with traditional anticoagulants, argatroban not only has the advantages of good anticoagulant effect and rapid onset, but also has high safety. Therefore, this study aims to verify the clinical efficacy of Argatroban in the treatment of PIS in a large population. In this study, 628 patients are expected to be enrolled into the study group. The experimental group and the control group are selected by dynamic random method. Both groups are given standard medical treatment, including routine antiplatelet, blood pressure control, statins to stabilize plaque, etc. The control group is only given standard medical treatment. In the experimental group, Argatroban is used on the basis of standard medical treatment. Both groups are treated for 7 days, and the second-class prevention standard medical treatment is given from the 8th to the 90th day. The main outcome measure is the good prognosis rate at the third month after PIS. The good prognosis was defined as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 3.
This study aims to investigate whether Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) improves rheo-erythrocrine dysfunction in acute ischemic stroke
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of a lower extremity telerehabilitation protocol with aims to improve lower extremity recovery among community-living stroke survivors across Canada.
Stroke can be linked to atherosclerosis of the large vessels, occlusion of the small intracerebral vessels (gaps), cardioembolic pathology or other rarer etiologies. The cardioembolic etiology of stroke in elderly patients may be difficult to prove. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cause of cerebral infarction (25%). Detecting AF is not easy. A 24-hour long-term holter and an implantable cardiac monitor (Reveal®) may be required. This etiology is all the more important as it requires anticoagulation treatment reducing the risk of recurrence in the short and long term. The left atrium thrombus is an indisputable marker of atrial fibrillation but it is rarely seen. Other cardiac etiologies such as a thrombus in the left ventricle, a large plaque or a thrombus of the aortic arch are possible. Finally, the permeable oval foramen and the aneurysm of the intra-auricular septum constitute a cause apart in young subjects (<60 years). Typically, the search for thrombus of the left atrium goes through a trans-thoracic cardiac ultrasound and a transesophageal cardiac ultrasound. These examinations, often negative, are performed several days after the onset of the cerebral infarction. The transesophageal cardiac ultrasound, considered as the "gold standard" examination to look for an intracardiac thrombus and an embologenic plaque in the aortic arch, is poorly tolerated. It is rarely performed in patients over 75 years of age. In addition, the length of stay for these patients may increase due to the wait for these exams. Several studies have validated the non-inferiority of the cardiac scanner compared to the transesophageal cardiac ultrasound for the detection of intracardiac thrombus (left atrium or left ventricle). In the study by Hur et al. performed in 55 consecutive patients with a probable cardioembolic infarction, 14 thrombi of the left atrium were detected and confirmed by the cardiac scanner, but the patients were young, with a median age of 61 years. In the Berlin prospective HEBRAS study, 475 patients underwent cardiovascular MRI. The results are being analyzed but the cardiac scanner is more sensitive for the detection of thrombus in the left atrium. A prospective study confirmed that the cardiac scanner is more precise in differentiating the left atrial thrombus from circulatory stasis in patients with stroke In this study, there is no information on the time between the stroke and the completion of the cardiac scanner. Almost all patients with stroke benefit from an angio-scan of the CT scan of supra-aortic trunks as part of the urgent assessment on Day 1 or Day 2. The investigators propose to perform at the same time a cardiac scanner in order to allow a rapid morphological cardiological assessment, at the level of the left atrium, the left ventricle and the arch of the aorta.
A non-interventional post-approval study on Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke - International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR) existing data of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) (0.9 mg/kg) in acute ischaemic stroke patients over 80 years, treated according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) in European countries.
Randomized controlled phase II trial to test the safety and preliminary efficacy of a dual thrombolytic treatment consisting of a small intravenous (IV) bolus of alteplase followed by IV infusion of mutant pro-urokinase against usual treatment with IV alteplase in patients presenting with ischemic stroke.
The objective of the study is to determine RNA blood biomarker based on 9 genes already identified in experimental studies, whose expression would be significantly increased in patient with ischemic stroke compared to controls.
The specific aims of this study are to: 1. Determine whether the endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke patients demonstrates "promise" or a lack thereof ("futility") in deciding what would be the next phase III trial. 2. Determine the proportion of subjects with slight or no disability (a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0-2) at 3 months after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA and compare with historical controls who were treated with IV rt-PA to identify (or lack of) futility. 3. Determine the proportion of subjects with improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥8 points or achieving a score of 0-1 at 24 hours after the onset of stroke among subjects with acute ischemic stroke after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA. 4. Determine the proportion of subjects with angiographic recanalization on post procedure angiogram according to modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) perfusion flow categories among subjects with acute ischemic stroke after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA. 5. Determine the proportion of subjects with treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) within 72 hours and development of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 27 ±3hrs post treatment among subjects with acute ischemic stroke after receiving endovascular treatment (mechanical thrombectomy) alone without using IV rt-PA.