View clinical trials related to Ischemic Stroke.
Filter by:The ESUS concept was introduced recently to describe a non-lacunar stroke of undetermined etiology. The following etiological workup is required in this setting: head CT or MRI, 12-lead ECG, transthoracic echocardiography, continuous cardiac monitoring for at least 24 hours after stroke, vascular imaging (ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, CT angiography, catheter angiography). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is considered not to be required. However, aortic arch atheroma as diagnosed by TEE in the setting of recent ischemic stroke is a major aortic source of embolism, as supported by numerous well conducted studies. The European Association of Echocardiography considers that TEE is the gold standard for the diagnosis and the characterization of aortic atheroma. It is also the method of choice for the diagnosis of infectious endocarditis. The aim of this work was to evaluate the rate of patients with a therapeutic modification induced by TEE (mainly anticoagulation and surgery), in consecutive patients admitted with ESUS at our institution stroke unit.
Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality.Acute ischemia causes irreversible damage to neurons and glial cells, leading to functional deficits and chronic sequelae with variable degrees of spontaneous recovery of function. Stem cells have been shown to enhance recovery through multiple immunomodulatory effects, neoangiogenesis and neurogenesis. We conducted a prospective randomised end observer blinded study to evaluate primarily the safety of intraarterial autologous stem cells delivered to ipsilateral middle cerebral artery in acute and subacute stroke patients (0-15 days post ictus).Secondarily we aimed to evaluate the outcome on the basis of clinical evaluation and follow up imaging
Stroke is a prevalent atherosclerosis vascular disease with high mortality, external counter pulsation (ECP) is an approved noninvasive therapy for angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock that augments blood flow to cardiac and systemic circuits, which improves the flow volume in the carotid. Though ECP is Ⅱa recommendation for stroke management, no multi-center control clinical study has been reported for prognosis of stroke. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ECP on stoke. To address this assumption, investigators enroll subjects with ischemic stroke and randomized into control or ECP group, the ECP intervention will be carried out with a standard protocol which involves 35 one-hour sessions (5 days a week) for continuous 7 weeks. The primary endpoint is mRS score in 3 months, secondary endpoints include NIHSS, BI and MMSE score, recurrence of stroke in 3 months, glycolipid metabolism, transcranial doppler (TCD) flow velocities and endothelial function.
The Purpose of this open-label randomized controlled multicenter trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mono-drug therapy with oral anticoagulant compared to combination therapy with antiplatelet drug, in ischemic stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and atherothrombosis.
Background: stroke is a major cause of death and disability. Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are able to re-open occluded vessels and save the ischemic tissue from death. However, recanalization of the occluded vessel may trigger activation of detrimental molecular pathways and exacerbate blood brain barrier (BBB) disruption, eventually determining hemorrhagic transformation (HT) or cerebral edema (CE), causing the so-called "reperfusion injury". There is increasing evidence that a number of factors measurable as circulating biomarkers, particularly metalloproteinases (MMP), contribute to reperfusion brain injury. Preliminary data show that BBB disruption can be traced in vivo by Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) imaging. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of circulating and imaging biomarkers in relation to reperfusion injury. Methods: consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation territory, scoring≥7 on NIHSS, candidates to intravenous thrombolysis or to endovascular treatment, will be enrolled in one hospital centre. Circulating levels of pro-, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory factors, metalloproteinases and their inductors/inhibitors, factors of endothelial dysfunction and fibrin resistance to lysis will be measured in blood samples taken from each patients pre-thrombolysis and 24 hours after thrombolysis. Biomarker levels will be studied in relation to CTP measures of BBB permeability and in relation to imaging signs of reperfusion injury after acute interventions, such as hemorrhagic transformation and cerebral edema. Results: enrollment started on October 2015. As of January 2017, 70 patients have been included. Results are expected by the end of 2018 with an estimated sample size of 140 patients. Using a definite protocol, a prospective collection of data, and an adequate number of patients assuring statistically powered data, this study will integrate clinical information with imaging and biological factors involved in reperfusion injury after cerebral ischemia.
The Ideal Sedation for Stroke Thrombectomy (ISST) registry will answer the key questions whether sedation with intubation and paralytics is feasible and whether it delays the time to recanalization in comparison with conscious sedation alone. As a pilot registry, it is anticipated to enroll 40 acute stroke patients requiring mechanical thrombectomy over 12-18 months. Following enrollment, data will be collected prospectively from medical records and from patients' visits.
The study was designed to evaluate the impact of a novel kinematic biofeedback system - SWORD - in the motor performance of patients after stroke. The SWORD system combines inertial motion trackers and a mobile app, allowing digitization of patient motion and providing real-time audiovisual biofeedback. The investigators hypothesize that the biofeedback feedback provided by the SWORD system improves patient performance, defined as an increase in the number of correct movements. The design of the study is a cross-over randomized clinical trial. Patients will be randomized into two groups. Both will perform two separate sessions consisting of one exercise - shoulder flexion with elbow flexion at 90 degrees - for 4 minutes in both experimental settings: with and without biofeedback. Group 1 will perform the exercise with biofeedback first and without biofeedback after, with an interval >24h. Group 2 will perform the exercise in the opposite order. The SWORD system will be used to record movement data in both sessions, but the feedback was only active in one of them.
BOSS-Trial I is a phase 2 clinical trial with the following objectives; 1. to prove the feasibility of a Bluetooth-equipped sphygmomanometer system in real-world clinical practice and wireless connection to the main server; 2. to prove the feasibility of the BP management strategy, including the pre-specified BP range, BP management algorithm, and behavioral; and 3. to gather information for the phase 3 trial including BP variability indices and their potentials as a treatment guidance.
This is a multi-center, prospective,continuous registry study. The investigators will include 3000 young adult (18-45 years old) patients with confirmed first-ever acute ischemic stroke in China. The main purpose of this study is to build the study cohort of young ischemic stroke patients in China, and to compare the prognosis and stroke recurrence of young patients with different ischemic stroke subtypes. Secondary objectives are trying to find biomarkers of stroke recurrence.
Title: Optimal Delay Time to Initiate Anticoagulation after Ischemic Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation (START): a pragmatic, adaptive randomized clinical trial. Primary Objective: • To determine the optimal time to initiate anticoagulation with a Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulant (NOAC) after ischemic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Secondary Objectives: - To compare the rates of primary adverse outcomes in a per protocol analysis - To compare 30 day clinical outcomes by the modified Rankin scale among the time-to-treatment groups - To compare 90 day clinical outcomes by the modified Rankin scale among the time-to-treatment groups - To explore the optimal timing in subgroups of age, sex, outcome category, and NOAC choice