Prognostic Perspective of Invasive Hyperemic & Non-Hyperemic Physiologic

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Coronary physiologic assessments by the pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) have become standard methods for identifying hemodynamic deprivation in coronary arterial stenosis for evidence-based percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Invasive physiologic indices-guidance enables on-site real time assessment for functional significance of epicardial coronary stenosis and the use of those indices has shown to be effective to guide treatment decision. Several studies further support the role of post-PCI FFR measurement as a functional marker of residual disease after PCI and prognostic indicator of patients. Although optimal cut-off values of post-PCI FFR varied across studies, an inverse relationship between post-PCI FFR and the risk of future clinical events have been reported consistently. Recently, non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) have been introduced in clinical practice. Although there are several different NHPRs, previous studies consistently indicated that those NHPRs shares similar diagnostic performance and prognostic implications. Nevertheless, few reports were available for clinical relevance of NHPRs in evaluation of post-PCI status. In this context, we will evaluate the physiologic characteristics and prognostic implication of post-PCI NHPRs and compare with those of post-PCI FFR in patients who underwent angiographically successful PCI with 2nd generation drug-eluting stent implantation (DES).

Clinical Trial Description

Patients who diagnosed significant coronary artery disease and treated by 2nd generation DES with post-PCI physiologic evaluation would be enrolled. Invasive physiologic assessment including recording of resting pressure trecing would be required at the baseline and at the end of index PCI procedure. PCI procedure would be performed upon local routine. Any available 2nd generation DES could be used. Web-based electronic-case record form (CRF) system will be used for collecting data. All data will be handled and analyzed by blind fashion at independent core lab. 2-year clinical outcome after index procedure will be analyzed. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04265443
Study type	Observational
Source	Samsung Medical Center
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	May 13, 2013
Completion date	October 1, 2022

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05654272` - Development of CIRC Technologies
Recruiting	`NCT06002932` - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04562805` - Infinity-Swedeheart Registry Based Randomized Clinical Trial (R-RCT)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05292079` - CAPTURER PMCF Study ( rEPIC04D )
Recruiting	`NCT05292014` - ANGIOLITE PMCF Study ( rEPIC04F )
Recruiting	`NCT05292118` - Navitian PMCF Study ( rEPIC04C )
Recruiting	`NCT05292092` - Essential Pro PMCF Study ( rEPIC04E )
Completed	`NCT05292105` - NC Xperience PMCF Study( rEPIC04B)
Completed	`NCT03076801` - Does Choral Singing Help imprOve Stress in Patients With Ischemic HeaRt Disease?	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04153383` - Milrinone on Cardiac Performance During Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT02982434` - The New Pharmaceutical Composition Containing Botulinum Toxin to Treat Atrial Fibrillation	Phase 2
Recruiting	`NCT02729064` - Intraoperative Nasal Insulin Effect on Plasma and CSF Insulin Concentration and Blood Glucose	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT02468401` - Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Advanced Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Interventions	N/A
Completed	`NCT02759406` - Evaluation of the Palmaz Mach-5 Grooved Bare Metal Coronary Stent System Versus the Palmaz Bare Metal Coronary Stent System in Patients With Symptomatic Ischemic Heart Disease: A Safety and Performance Study	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01681381` - Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness Of The Tivoli® DES and The Firebird2® DES For Treatment Coronary Revascularization	N/A
Completed	`NCT01699802` - Influence of Inhaled Anaesthetics on Rebreathing of Carbon Dioxide When Using an Anaesthesia Gas Reflector (AnaConDa)	N/A
Completed	`NCT01604213` - Effects of Vildagliptin/Metformin Combination on Markers of Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Inflammation in Diabetics With Coronary Artery Disease	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01334268` - RESOLUTE China RCT	N/A
Completed	`NCT01724567` - Copenhagen Study of Obese Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Low Energy Diet or Interval Training	N/A
Completed	`NCT02159235` - Heavy Metals, Angiogenesis Factors and Osteopontin in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Prognostic Perspective of Invasive Hyperemic and Non-Hyperemic Physiologic Indices Measured After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention — PERSPECTIVEPCI

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms