Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs: ACCRUE

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Numerous human cardiac stem cell studies have been published, including relatively small number of patients. Meta-analysis of randomized trials have reported safety and a 3-6% increase in global left ventricular performance after intracoronary stem cell therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Since most of the studies used different type of stem cells, delivery modes, and patient population, the results are heterogenous, therefore the comparison of the results is biased regarding generalizable conclusions about the effect of treatment. The present comparative meta-analysis is based on individual patient data, and gathers and pools the raw data, and analyzes the clinical outcome, safety and efficacy of the cardiac stem cell therapy.

Clinical Trial Description

- Background: Many clinical trials and meta-analyses presented moderate but significant improvement of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after intracoronary autologous bone-marrow (BM) or peripheral blood origin stem cells transfer. However, it remains controversial, whether this beneficial effects is comparable with the intramyocardial delivery of the stem cells, or could be maintained during moderate and long term follow-up. The BOOST trial suggested that cardiac stem cell therapy did not improve LVEF at 5-year follow-up. By contrast, BALANCE study showed a long sustained benefit of BM-stem cells treatment. Due to these divergent outcomes of the presented trials, the aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the cardiac stem cell therapy in different patient population, delivery mode and cell type, to find out, which patients with which therapy mode can have the greatest benefit from cardiac stem cell therapy. - Study design: individual patient data meta-analysis - Data sources: European Centre performing human cardiac stem cell therapy have been contacted calling for participation. - Methods: Individual data gathering and entering into the database for a pooled analysis. The meta-analysis will be done in line with recommendation from the Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses guidelines with Review Manager 5.0. Fixed-effect model will be used. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT01098591
Study type	Observational
Source	Medical University of Vienna
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	November 2007
Completion date	December 2020

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05654272` - Development of CIRC Technologies
Recruiting	`NCT06002932` - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04562805` - Infinity-Swedeheart Registry Based Randomized Clinical Trial (R-RCT)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05292079` - CAPTURER PMCF Study ( rEPIC04D )
Recruiting	`NCT05292092` - Essential Pro PMCF Study ( rEPIC04E )
Recruiting	`NCT05292014` - ANGIOLITE PMCF Study ( rEPIC04F )
Recruiting	`NCT05292118` - Navitian PMCF Study ( rEPIC04C )
Completed	`NCT05292105` - NC Xperience PMCF Study( rEPIC04B)
Completed	`NCT03076801` - Does Choral Singing Help imprOve Stress in Patients With Ischemic HeaRt Disease?	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04153383` - Milrinone on Cardiac Performance During Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT02729064` - Intraoperative Nasal Insulin Effect on Plasma and CSF Insulin Concentration and Blood Glucose	Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT02982434` - The New Pharmaceutical Composition Containing Botulinum Toxin to Treat Atrial Fibrillation	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT02468401` - Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Advanced Renal Dysfunction Undergoing Coronary Interventions	N/A
Completed	`NCT02759406` - Evaluation of the Palmaz Mach-5 Grooved Bare Metal Coronary Stent System Versus the Palmaz Bare Metal Coronary Stent System in Patients With Symptomatic Ischemic Heart Disease: A Safety and Performance Study	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01681381` - Evaluate Safety And Effectiveness Of The Tivoli® DES and The Firebird2® DES For Treatment Coronary Revascularization	N/A
Completed	`NCT01604213` - Effects of Vildagliptin/Metformin Combination on Markers of Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Inflammation in Diabetics With Coronary Artery Disease	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01699802` - Influence of Inhaled Anaesthetics on Rebreathing of Carbon Dioxide When Using an Anaesthesia Gas Reflector (AnaConDa)	N/A
Completed	`NCT01724567` - Copenhagen Study of Obese Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease Undergoing Low Energy Diet or Interval Training	N/A
Completed	`NCT01334268` - RESOLUTE China RCT	N/A
Completed	`NCT02159235` - Heavy Metals, Angiogenesis Factors and Osteopontin in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs: ACCRUE — ACCRUE

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms