View clinical trials related to Infection.
Filter by:In recent years, the incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) has been increasing in China, which poses great challenges and burdens to the medical community due to its unknown etiology, recurrence and incurability. Co-infection is one of the important causes in IBD development. IBD accompanied with Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) can significantly decrease the treatment efficiency, leading to increased surgical rate, increased mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and increased hospital costs. Recently, several Chinese clinical guidelines about IBD or CDI have been published, but these guidelines are mainly based on the foreign studies. Compared with the developed countries, the lack of multi-center, large-scale and multi-test clinical trials and cohort studies caused limited understanding for IBD-CDI in China. Therefore, it is of great importance to carry out the multi-center clinical trials and analysis on IBD-CDI to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic efficiency in IBD-CDI patients Objective: 1. To evaluate the prevalence rate of IBD-CDI in Chinese adults in China based on the multi-center clinical trials.. 2. To analyze the related risk factors of IBD-CDI in China based on the multi-center clinical trials. 3. To analyze the intestinal flora of IBD-CDI patients via high-throughput sequencing.
Mesh infection is the main complication in abdominal hernia repair. In case of infection, a conservative management of mesh is not always possible. The removal of the mesh (occurring in 5.1% to 8% of wall hernia repair) increases the risk of recurrence and surgical morbidity. Within our digestive surgery department (CHRU de Nancy), an infection rate of 10.7% (32 cases out of 298 patients with wall hernia repair) was observed between January 2016 and December 2018. This rate is higher than those usually described in the literature. Several studies have identified predictors of mesh infection and explantation after abdominal wall hernia repair. The influence of the operating environment (temperature, hygrometry, pressure, number of people present, etc.) has, to our knowledge, never been studied. If the risk of prosthesis infection is influenced by one or more of these extrinsic characteristics, it is possible to act on these practices to reduce this risk. The main purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics specific to the intervention and the operating environment associated with mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia reconstruction
A retrospective cohort study of women treated by excisional therapy due to HSIL/ CIN at Clínico San Carlos Hospital between 2012-2018. The effectiveness of prophylactic vaccination against HPV in women treated for HPV-related disease will be evaluated. For this purpose, the percentage of cervical lesion recurrence among a group of treated and vaccinated women against HPV between the years 2015-2018 will be compared with a control group of treated and non-vaccinated women against HPV since 2012-2015. It will be an essential requirement that the patient provide a vaccination card from their health center where there is proof of their immunization status and date of administration. Inclusion criteria: - Women older than 18 years who received excisional therapy due to HSIL /CIN injury confirmed histologically. - Women who sign informed consent. - Patients with negative results in the first post-surgery control. - Patients who have received HPV vaccination and provide vaccination card. Exclusion criteria: - Women who do not wish or cannot give their informed consent and / or do not comply with the requirements of the study. - Patients treated by an indication other than HSIL/CIN. - Patients under immunosuppression conditions.
Background: Infections associated with mechanical ventilation are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, which results not only in an increase in hospitalization days and care costs, but also in an increase in DALYS (years of life disability adjustment) in the population. Critically ill patients have a high risk of infection as a result of underlying immunodeficiency, comorbidity and placement of invasive devices (such as endotracheal tubes and intravascular devices). Infections in these patients constitute a challenge for hospital authorities, as they are considered a social and economic problem that influences the quality of care, in a system where health services are increasingly affected by high patient care costs and the reduction of public spending. The decrease in the number of bacteria in the oral cavity reduces the presence of microorganisms available for translocation and colonization of the lower respiratory tract; Therefore, performing oral care intervention is considered an economically attractive method to reduce the risk of developing infections associated with endotracheal intubation. In our environment, oral cleaning is performed as part of the nursing care package granted to all patients of the ICU, however, there is no standardized method among nursing staff that guarantees the desired prevention. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mouth-rinse with 0.12% chlorhexidine to prevent infections associated with mechanical ventilation in patients in the intensive care unit in a third level hospital in Mérida, Yucatán. Hypothesis: Mouth-rinse with 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily more effective and safe than mouthwash with bicarbonated isotonic solution twice daily to prevent infections associated with mechanical ventilation in patients in the intensive care unit of a hospital third level. Methodology: Double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial with active substance for the evaluation of the non-inferiority of the efficacy and safety of mouthwash with 0.12% chlorhexidine twice daily compared to isotonic bicarbonated solution twice daily for the prevention of any infection associated with mechanical ventilation in patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit of a third level hospital.
Microbiota contributes to the immunological, hormonal and metabolic homeostasis of the host. As in all natural orifices in the body, there is also a microbiota and mycobiota specific to the vagina. On the other hand, the sonographic short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy is associated with preterm delivery, which may be an important cause of mortality and morbidity in the neonatal period. American Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), British Royal Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) and the American Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) suggest that the measurement of transvaginal sonographic cervical length at 20-24 gestational weeks for the screening of preterm birth. The aforementioned associations also recommend the use of progesterone in the treatment of women who diagnosed with short cervix by transvaginal ultrasonography due to the fact that progesterone is an effective medication in the prevention of preterm birth (Grade B). Previous vaginal microbiota studies have shown that some bacterial species such as Lactobacillus insers cause a predisposition to premature labor in women with a short cervix. However, the prominent lack in these studies is that the eukaryotic fungi in abundant vaginal flora have not been evaluated. On the other hand, it was already shown that progesterone treatment is able to prevent only 45% preterm birth in women with short cervical length. This observational prospective study thus aims to evaluate the variety of microbiota and/or mycobiota in pregnancies resulting in preterm birth and those who give birth at term. Although women with short cervical length receive progesterone regularly from the second trimester, the preterm birth may occur. In this study, the investigators also aim to evaluate the patterns of microbiota and mycobiota from vaginal swabs of women who had preterm birth with short cervical length and postpartum swabs of the placenta and fetal oral cavity.
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of infection prevention silicone urinary catheters and conventional catheters for patients scheduled to perform urinary catheterization after radical cystectomy for urological diseases for more than 2 weeks Want to prove the clinical efficacy and safety.
This study is a multi-center open-label randomized study, and we sought to investigate the redundancy of post-procedural prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. There are 2 arms in this study. One arm will receive pre-procedural intravenous antibiotics only. The other arm will receive both pre-procedural intravenous antibiotics and post-procedural 3-day oral antibiotics.
Patients who are admitted to hospital with serious infections, such as those in bone, joints or spine, require a long course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. After an initial treatment course in hospital or through a dedicated outpatient antibiotic program many patients can complete their treatment course at home. Such infections are often caused by bacteria called Staphylococci, and currently there are three antibiotic options used routinely. A fourth antibiotic, ceftriaxone, is a promising alternative; it is also effective against Staphylococci, and is more convenient, less costly and easier to give at home, however, it has not been studied thoroughly in a prospective manner. This study will compare ceftriaxone to routinely used antibiotics (cloxacillin, cefazolin or daptomycin) to see if ceftriaxone is equally as safe and efficacious in curing deep-seated Staphylococcal infections in patients receiving home IV antibiotics. Patients with deep-seated infections caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species will be randomly assigned home IV treatment with ceftriaxone OR one of the three other antibiotics before leaving the hospital. Patients will then receive usual care from an Infectious Disease physician and Home IV team. The study team will assess whether cure has been achieved by the end of the IV treatment, follow-up at 6 months to see if patients remain infection-free, and record any side-effects of treatment. The overall goal is to determine whether ceftriaxone can be considered non-inferior to usual antibiotic treatment in treating Staphylococcal infections in a home IV setting.
IL-2 is a pleiotropic cytokine which can regulate or stimulate the differentiation and function of CD4+, CD8+ and NK cells. An opened-labelled trial and a retrospective study have indicated the incidence of infection is lower in the treatment of low-dose IL-2 combined with corticosteroid and immunosuppressor. We are going to conduct a multi-center prospective observational study to verify the above results.
Introduction: The current evidence on the efficacy of Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement (ALBC) in reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary joint reconstruction is insufficient. In several European countries, the use of ALBC is routine practice unlike in the US where ALBC use is not approved in low-risk patients. It has been claimed that the antibiotic in ALBC increase the risk of aseptic loosening, risk of systemic toxicity, allergic reaction, and bacterial resistance. Therefore we designed a double-blinded (patients and data analysts) pragmatic multicenter register-based randomized controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate the effects of ALBC compared to plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods and analysis: A minimum of 9,172 patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA will be recruited and equally randomized into the ALBC group and the plain bone cement group. This trial will be conducted in Norwegian hospitals that routinely perform cemented primary TKA. . The primary outcome will be risk of revision surgery due to PJI at 1-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be: - risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up; - patient related outcome measures (PROMs) like function, pain, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life at 1-, 6-, and 10-years of follow-up; - risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up; and - cost-effectiveness of routine ALBC vs plain bone cement use in primary TKA. We will use 1:1 randomization with random permuted blocks and stratify by participating hospitals to randomize patients to receive ALBC or plain bone cement. Inclusion, randomization, and follow-up will be through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the Western Norway Regional Committees on Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK-Vest) (reference number: 2019/751/REK vest) dated: 21.06.2019. The trial results will be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension (CONSORT Extension) reporting guideline 2010 statement for non-inferiority trials. The trial results will be reported to the public through national and international scientific conferences, participating hospitals, patient organizations, and peer-reviewed journals. Discussion: If we find that plain bone cement is non-inferior to the ALBC, it will challenge the routine use of ALBC in primary arthroplasty, due to ecological concerns and costs. However, if routine use of ALBC is associated with a reduced risk of PJI and with minor impact on bacterial resistance, PROMs, and costs, the well-established use of prophylactic ALBC in primary arthroplasty will be supported