View clinical trials related to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Filter by:This is a Phase II study in patients with advanced liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma) as a result of hepatitis B and/or C infection. Participants will be dosed with either MTL-CEBPA (an experimental treatment) and sorafenib or sorafenib alone. The MTL-CEBPA is administered once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion. Sorafenib is taken orally from Day 8 for the combination group or Day 1 for the sorafenib alone group at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. Participants will receive 3 week cycles of treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death occurs. The combination of MTL-CEBA and sorafenib combination of treatment was tested in a previous Phase I study (OUTREACH) which showed anti-tumour activity along with a good safety and toxicity profile.
Researchers are looking for a better way to treat people diagnosed with liver cancer which may have spread to nearby tissue and is unlikely to be cured or controlled with treatment (advanced metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC). Before a treatment can be approved for people to take, researchers do clinical trials to better understand its safety and how it works. In this trial, the researchers will learn more about the trial treatment, regorafenib, in a small number of participants. They will study the results when the trial treatment is taken with another cancer treatment called pembrolizumab. There will be 2 parts to this trial. The part 1 (pilot phase) will include about 52 men and women. The part 2 (expansion phase) will include about 67 men and women. All of the participants will have HCC and will be aged 18 years or older. All of the participants will have tried other treatments that did not help their HCC. These other treatments (PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors) are designed to work by stopping the activity of certain proteins in the immune system thought to play a role in HCC. During both parts of the trial, the participants will take regorafenib and receive pembrolizumab. In the pilot phase, there will be 2 groups of participants. The group that each participant joins will be based on the treatment they already received for their HCC. The researchers will review the results in each group to learn if regorafenib and pembrolizumab are helping one group of participants more than others. Outcome of this review will determine the population to be treated in the expansion phase.
The detection and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is a public health issue. MRI is the most sensitive examination for diagnosis and especially hypervascularization in the arterial phase. Several studies have shown that MRI multiphase arterial sequences are superior to single phase to capture the arterial phase. The purpose of this study is to compare arterial enhancement sensibilities between multi and single phase sequences.
A randomized trial showed that sorafenib plus hepatic artery infusion of 85mg/m² oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil is more effective than sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a retrospective study showed that hepatic artery infusion of 130 mg/m² oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil is more effective than sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. It is unknown which oxaliplatin dose is better.
There is a high prevalence of hepatic cirrhosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), or chemotherapy-induced hepatic atrophy or hepatosteatosis in patients with liver metastases associated with high risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MRI-SPION radiotherapy planning will facilitate detection and maximize avoidance of residual functionally active hepatic parenchyma from over-the-threshold irradiation thus increasing safety of liver SBRT in patients with pre-existing liver conditions. The investigators have previously demonstrated that liver SBRT with SPECT/CT functional treatment planning utilizing 99mTc sulfur colloid in transplant eligible patients associated with minimal hepatotoxicity and without hastening of advanced hepatic cirrhosis progression while patients await liver transplant. Switching from nuclear medicine to an MR-Linac-SPION based quantitative treatment-planning platform will substantially improve diagnostic accuracy in defining safe volumes of residual functional hepatic parenchyma for liver SBRT planning on MR-Linac.
The purpose of this study is the development of a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) platform, where validation studies will be conducted for liver disease subtyping and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) phenotyping on images for use as diagnostic and prognostic markers of outcome in conjunction with large scale data registries and advanced predictive machine learning methodologies. The proposed objectives will deliver one or more fit-for-purpose non-invasive imaging-based methodologies to evaluate the presence, activity and type of HCC in clinical practice.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), including programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor or programmed cell death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor , is recommended to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the safety of ICI in patients with a high HBV-DNA load is unknown because of the potential risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. This study was to compare the HBV reactivation between patients with low HBV-DNA loads and high HBV-DNA loads undergoing antiviral prophylaxis and ICI.
This is an open label, dose escalation and dose expansion study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor activity of STP705 administered intratumorally in cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis in subjects with advanced/metastatic or surgically unresectable solid tumors who are refractory to standard therapy. Goals: 1. To determine the MTD or RP2D of STP705 when administered intratumorally into cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, or liver metastasis. 2. To establish the dose of STP705 recommended for future phase 2 studies when administered intratumorally.
Hepatic artery infusion of oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 2400 mg/m² fluorouracil is effective in hepatocellular carcinoma. However, SILIUS study showed that sorafenib plus hepatic artery infusion of cisplatin and fluorouracil did not significantly improve overall survival compared with sorafenib alone. Whether fluorouracil is effevtive is known.
In this study, investigators aimed to evaluated the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation combined with anlotinib and TQB2450 Solution in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive microwave ablation plus anlotinib and TQB2450 Solution or microwave ablation plus TQB2450 Solution. Primary end points were objective response rate(ORR). Second end points include overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate. Safety was assessed in all patients.