View clinical trials related to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare microwave ablation using the Acculis Microwave Tissue Ablation (MTA) System with conventional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using Covidien cool-tip radiofrequency needle in patients with localized unresectabe hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC). The investigators hypothesize that microwave ablation can achieve a better complete ablation rate as compared to radiofrerquency ablation. A randomized comparative study is performed by randomly assigned participants to microwave ablation arm or radiofrequency ablation arm. The efficacy of treatment outcome is assessed by the complete tumor ablation rate at 1 month, recurrence rate and survival time of participants. Safety of the procedures is also compared between the 2 treatment arms.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential role of Axitinib (AG-013736) in the treatment of unresectable/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
In unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, TACE using Lipiodol/anti cancer agent emulsion is the standard treatment and reported as a significantly better treatment through randomized comparison study like Llovet, etc. than conservative treatment. Recently, doctors do transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting bead, and it is proved less side effect and better efficacy than conventional TACE using Lipiodol in Precision V study by Dr. Lammer, etc. But, it could not defined improved survival rate as expected. This study's purpose is evaluating treatment efficacy, survival rate and safety of TACE using drug eluting bead by comparing to conventional TACE using doxorubicin/Lipiodol emulsion for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
This study aims at testing the utility of PET Scan as a screening tool for liver transplantation in patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Patients being worked up for liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma will undergo a PET Scan and will be followed until 2 years after transplantation. At that time survival data will be analysed according to PET Scan results to determine if it can be used to predict outcome.
Specific urine proteases or groups of these enzymes can be reliable biomarkers and an effective gauge of response to therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Indication : Hepatocellular carcinoma, maximum size 9 cm, with single or multiple nodes whose total tumor mass can technically be irradiated, non-resectable, and not a candidate for percutaneous therapy with recommended treatment via hyperselective transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE).
This is a study of ADI-PEG 20 (pegylated arginine deiminase), an arginine degrading enzyme versus placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have failed prior systemic treatment (chemotherapy). Hepatocellular carcinomas have been found to require arginine, an amino acid. Thus the hypothesis is that by restricting arginine with ADI-PEG 20, the hepatocellular carcinoma cells will starve and die.
This is a phase II study of axitinib as the second-line on the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study is a proof-of-concept study to see if axitinib has any anti-tumor effect in HCC. The primary endpoint is disease stabilization that lasts for at least 8 weeks without progression of tumor-related symptoms.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who receive either E7050 administered with Sorafenib or Sorafenib alone experience greater benefit (cancer responds to treatment) when E7050 is administered with Sorafenib.
Targeted therapies such as multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORI) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), demonstrate a high level of efficacy with acceptable tolerability. Currently, there are five approved targeted therapies available for RCC: sunitinib (Sutent®), sorafenib (Nexavar®), pazopanib (Votrient®), temsirolimus (Torisel®), and everolimus (Afinitor®). Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib and gastro intestinal stromal tumors patients treated with sunitinib will be included, too. Since this agents have dermatological adverse events in common, with oral mucositis (OM), hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) and papulopustular eruption (PPE) as an disabling side effect, we require evidence based management options to prevent and treat these adverse events. The incidence of OM of any grade is for sunitinib 38%, sorafenib 28%, pazopanib 4%, temsirolimus 41%, and everolimus 44%. Recent data suggest that TKI and mTORI associated OM is distinct from conventional mucositis and more closely resembles aphthous OM. Recently, supersaturated calcium-phosphate rinse (Caphosol®), a Ca2+/PO43- mouth rinse, became available to prevent or treat OM. The objective is to assess the relieving effect of Caphosol® oral rinse on clinical outcomes which include oral intake, swallowing function and pain associated with incidence of grade ≥ 1 oral side effects and the anticancer therapy cessation in patients treated with selected targeted anticancer therapy. Patients with OM > grade 0 on targeted therapy will be randomly allocated to receive either Caphosol® or NaCl 0.9% rinse for two weeks. After the first rinse period all patients will switch to the opposite treatment arm (NaCl 0.9% or Caphosol®) for another two weeks. Duration of oral side effects, severity, pain, dose of analgesics and tolerability will be assessed weekly with the Modified-VHNSS-version-2.0 oral-specific questionnaire. Patients will be stratified by targeted anticancer agent and per tumor type (pre-defined cohorts). Objective severity of oral side effects will be assessed using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Correlation of subjective Modified-VHNSS-version-2.0 scores with the objective NCI-CTCAE grade, sex, age, targeted therapy type, and cancer type will be conducted.