Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare a new high vacuum pressure chest drainage system (NO-NUMO™) with the standard low vacuum pressure drainage system already in use in cardiac surgeries. The new system uses smaller diameter drainage tubing to remove blood from the chest after open heart surgery. This is less painful to the patient and should help the patient to breathe better after operation. Preliminary data suggests that the high vacuum suction is effective and practical, and could actually reduce the amount of chest tube bleeding after surgery without compromising heart function. This new high vacuum drainage system was approved by the FDA in 2002. Subsequent testing at University of California, Irvine indicated that this unique system may allow the surgeon to predict excessive postoperative bleeding before the patient is transferred out of the operating room, thus adding safety, convenience, and cost effectiveness to their use.


Clinical Trial Description

High vacuum chest drainage was once considered inadvisable because of a possible suction injury to soft tissues, such as the lungs or mediastinum. Wakabayashi showed that excessive suction force generated by a high vacuum pressure was related to the surface area of the suction applied to the tissues and not the vacuum pressure itself1&2. He postulated that suction injury to the lung would not occur if the suction force of a chest tube is below the capillary blood pressure of 30 - 35 torr2. Based on this theory, Wakabayashi developed a double-lumen chest drainage tube3 (Trade name NO-NUMO™) and its clinical use was approved by FDA4 in 2002. A prototype 7-5Fr double-lumen chest tube was successfully tested in laboratory animals and three patients1&2 and the safety of high vacuum chest drainage was proven in a large number of patients undergoing uncomplicated thoracoscopic surgeries2. The unique design of the new drainage tube is the small diameter double lumen tube with hundreds of tiny holes that allows rapid drainage without damaging effects of high suction over a limited surface area. High vacuum suction is available on wall units already in place in the OR and ICU beds. To adopt this system for clinical use, a high vacuum gauge was needed (most don't go beyond 200 torr) to monitor suction, and a high pressure battery powered vacuum pump for transport was necessary, so that drainage was maintained and blood clotting in the tube avoided during the period of prolonged transport from the OR and the setup in the ICU. Several brands of portable vacuum pumps on the market were evaluated before concluding that the Vario™ pump (Medela® Inc.) was superior. The maximal vacuum pressure that Vario pump can generate is 630 torr or 84 kPa which is equivalent to -857 cmH2O.

The NO-NUMO™ High Vacuum Body Cavity Drainage System consist of; (1) disposable NO-NUMO™ body cavity drainage tubes, (2) disposable Vario™ fluid management canisters and (3) Vario™ portable vacuum pump. We evaluated this new system, using a 13Fr triple-tube set for the mediastinal drainage, a 13Fr single-tube for the left pleural drainage and two 13Fr NO-NUMO tubes for the drainage of the lower extremity subcutaneous wounds following the harvesting of the saphenous veins. The tubing was connected to a disposable liner of a Medi-Vac™ (Cardinal Health, Inc.) suction canisters, which was connected to a Vario pump at 300 torr (= 40 kPa) in patients following open heart surgeries. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT00581399
Study type Interventional
Source University of California, Irvine
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
Start date September 2006
Completion date September 2010

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06030596 - SPECT Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fraction Flow Reserve
Completed NCT04080700 - Korean Prospective Registry for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Distal Radial Approach (KODRA)
Recruiting NCT03810599 - Patient-reported Outcomes in the Bergen Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06002932 - Comparison of PROVISIONal 1-stent Strategy With DEB Versus Planned 2-stent Strategy in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06032572 - Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the VRS100 System in PCI (ESSENCE) N/A
Recruiting NCT05308719 - Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT04242134 - Drug-coating Balloon Angioplasties for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions N/A
Completed NCT04556994 - Phase 1 Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Lower Limb Paddling Effects in Post CABG Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT05846893 - Drug-Coated Balloon vs. Drug-Eluting Stent for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Large Coronary Artery Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT06027788 - CTSN Embolic Protection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05023629 - STunning After Balloon Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT04941560 - Assessing the Association Between Multi-dimension Facial Characteristics and Coronary Artery Diseases
Completed NCT04006288 - Switching From DAPT to Dual Pathway Inhibition With Low-dose Rivaroxaban in Adjunct to Aspirin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Phase 4
Completed NCT01860274 - Meshed Vein Graft Patency Trial - VEST N/A
Recruiting NCT06174090 - The Effect of Video Education on Pain, Anxiety and Knowledge Levels of Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery Patients N/A
Terminated NCT03959072 - Cardiac Cath Lab Staff Radiation Exposure
Completed NCT03968809 - Role of Cardioflux in Predicting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Outcomes
Recruiting NCT05065073 - Iso-Osmolar vs. Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04566497 - Assessment of Adverse Outcome in Asymptomatic Patients With Prior Coronary Revascularization Who Have a Systematic Stress Testing Strategy Or a Non-testing Strategy During Long-term Follow-up. N/A
Completed NCT05096442 - Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Coronary De Novo Lesions N/A