Coronary Blood Flow Regulation During General Anesthesia

Healthy Clinical Trial

Official title:

Cardiac Sympathetic Innervation and Coronary Blood Flow Regulation During General Anesthesia

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00866801
• Other study ID #: ANES 2008-12
• Secondary ID: 2008 T003
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: March 20, 2009
• Last updated: October 12, 2015
• Start date: April 2009
• Est. completion date: October 2014

Study information

• Verified date: October 2015
• Source: VU University Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC)
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The central hypothesis in the present project is that general anesthesia may alter autonomic control such that perioperative coronary blood flow (CBF) is significantly disturbed.

These disturbances in coronary blood flow may contribute to the development of myocardial ischemia in the perioperative period. Furthermore, patients with an intrinsically altered autonomic sympathetic innervation, like diabetics, are even more prone to develop perioperative disturbances in coronary blood flow.

Here the researchers will investigate what the direct effects are of general and locoregional anesthesia on the CBF. Furthermore, the researchers aim to evaluate whether diabetic subjects show more disturbed CBF responses to anesthesia as compared to non-diabetics.

Description:

In response to intraoperative stress, increased autonomic sympathetic activity may alter myocardial oxygen demand. Under normal physiological circumstances, sympathetic stimulation increases myocardial blood flow via adrenergic coronary vasodilation. However, coronary vessels contain both α- and β-adrenoreceptors, and if the coronary circulation is impaired due to cardiovascular disease, unopposed adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction may contribute to ischemia. Anesthetics reduce both coronary blood flow (CBF) regulation and the sympathetic autonomic nervous activity. However, it is unclear whether anesthetic-related reductions in CBF are a result of inhibited autonomic sympathetic innervation. Data regarding alterations in myocardial blood flow in response to sympathetic stimulation during anesthesia provide conflicting results. Moffitt and Sethna showed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery that CBF decreased during sternotomy-induced sympathetic stimulation, whereas Kirno et al. showed an increase in coronary blood flow after sternotomy. To our best knowledge, coronary vascular responses to sympathetic stimulation in anesthetized healthy humans are lacking because of absence of reliable non-invasive measurement of myocardial blood flow. The introduction of non-invasive contrast-echocardiographic techniques that allow evaluation of regional myocardial blood flow enable evaluation of the relation between autonomic control and CBF during anesthesia.

Cardiac complications like myocardial ischemia remain one of the main causes of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Interestingly, the presence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) strongly predicts abnormalities in myocardial perfusion and impaired coronary vasodilator responses to stress. This implies that symptoms of CAN, like resting tachycardia, orthostasis and alterations in heart rate variability may predict the degree of impairment of CBF regulation. Indeed, autonomic neuropathy as determined by heart rate variability predicted mortality in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery, but the contribution of impaired coronary vasodilatory responses to these results has not been established. Clarification of the relation between autonomic control and CBF during anesthesia may not only contribute to our insight in pro-ischemic processes in the heart, but may lead to changes in preoperative assessment of patients at risk for perioperative ischemia, thereby reducing perioperative complications.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 45
• Est. completion date: October 2014
• Est. primary completion date: February 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• male

• age between 18-75 years

• scheduled for non-cardiac intermediate or high risk surgery

• for patient group 2: indication for thoracic epidural anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

• neurosurgery

• known/documented cardiac disease

• (untreated) hypertension

• abnormal ECG or echocardiogram

• peripheral vascular disease

• renal disease requiring hemo- or peritoneal dialysis

• inability to perform transthoracic echocardiography

• medication interfering with presynaptic catecholamine uptake

• for patient group 2: contra-indication for thoracic epidural anesthesia (bleeding diathesis, infection at the puncture site, patient refusal, severe stenotic valvular disease)

• previous allergic reaction to echocardiographic contrast agents

• contraindications for the use of echocardiographic contrast agents

Study Design

Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Autonomic Neuropathy
• Coronary Artery Disease
• Diabetes
• Healthy
• Myocardial Ischemia
• Nervous System Diseases

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Netherlands	VU University Medical Center	Amsterdam	Noord-Holland

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
VU University Medical Center	Netherlands Heart Foundation

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Coronary flow reserve		Within the first 3 days postoperatively	No
Secondary	Diabetic autonomic neuropathy		Within the first 3 days postoperatively	No