View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a large research study conducted in the United States, found that lifestyle intervention was effective in lowering risk for development of type 2 diabetes. It is important to evaluate the DPP lifestyle interventions in "real world" settings. The purpose of this project is to test an adapted version of the DPP lifestyle intervention in several community settings, including a worksite, a health care facility (primary care practice and local community centers dedicated to older adults.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively explore the impact from the different cardiovascular risk factors on early cardiovascular organ damage in 761 middle aged patients with type 2 diabetes.
Comparison of blood glucose levels in patients with Type 1 diabetes when they take a new basal insulin analog and when they take insulin glargine
Evaluation of different glycemic variations between the dialysis period and non-dialysis period in two groups: nondiabetic and diabetic patients undergone two different hemodialysis methods. Thirty-six patients, males and females, aged 50-80 years, with end stage renal disease (ESRD) will undergo hemodialysis and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The investigators will evaluate also inflammation markers before and after the different hemodialysis methods.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) has a stabilizing function on the blood glucose
The purpose of this study is to determine if BMS-770767 is safe, well tolerated, measure its levels in the blood (pharmacokinetics), and measure the levels of chemicals (biomarkers) that may be affected by this drug (pharmacodynamics) in a type 2 diabetes patient population
This trial will be conducted in Africa, Asia, North America and South America. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare NN1250 (insulin degludec) with sitagliptin, as add-on to subject's own current oral antidiabetic (OAD) treatment, in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with 1-2 OADs (metformin, sulphonylurea, glinides or pioglitazone).
This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and the United States of America (USA). The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of NN5401 (insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp)) with insulin glargine (IGlar), both as add-on to subject's ongoing treatment with metformin + at least one OAD (oral anti-diabetic drug). The main period is registered internally at Novo Nordisk as NN5401-3590 while the extension period is registered as NN5401-3726.
Rationale Rosiglitazone and troglitazone both promote differentiation of pre-adipocytes into adipocytes in subcutaneous, but not omental fat, and reduce gamma glutamyl transferase, a surrogate marker for intra-abdominal and hepatic fat. Troglitazone has been shown by abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to reduce the intra-abdominal adipose tissue area in type 2 diabetics. Similarly rosiglitazone has also been shown to increase subcutaneous but not intra-abdominal fat in patients with type 2 diabetes. In the same study it was also shown to cause a substantial reduction in hepatic fat. Central fat depots are believed to be associated with more cardiovascular risk than subcutaneous fat depots. By contrast, sulphonylurea-associated weight gain has been shown by abdominal CT scan to include increases in intra-abdominal adipose tissue. The aim of this study is to compare the body fat distribution pattern of glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone versus glibenclamide and placebo (especially the intra-abdominal adipose tissue and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue areas) in patients with type 2 diabetes. It is hypothesised that rosiglitazone will lead to the accumulation of excess energy stores in the subcutaneous rather than the intra-abdominal adipose tissue depot. In addition, it is hoped that by having a positive effect on diastolic blood pressure, lipid levels, BMI, rosiglitazone will be shown to have a better cardiovascular risk profile when used in combination with glibenclamide rather than when glibenclamide is used alone. Although insulin resistance has been shown to be a primary defect causing type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin secretory defect has also been known to be an important factor in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A previous study has shown that in Korean patients, early-phase insulin secretory defect may be the initial abnormality in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus [56]. This study also aims to assess the efficacy and safety of glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone versus glibenclamide plus placebo therapy in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, a previous study has shown that in Korean patients, early-phase insulin secretory defect may be the initial abnormality in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study aims to show that rosiglitazone treatment in Korean patients, regardless of their early phase insulin secretory ability, is just as efficacious and safe. Objective(s) Primary To evaluate the effect of 12 months oral treatment with glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone versus oral glibenclamide plus placebo, on body fat distribution (as measured by the change in the ratio between the intra-abdominal adipose tissue and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue areas) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Secondary - To investigate the efficacy of glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone, compared to glibenclamide plus placebo on beta-cell function and insulin resistance as calculated by HOMA-B and HOMA-R. - To investigate the efficacy of glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone, compared to glibenclamide plus placebo on fasting plasma glucose, insulin, fasting serum lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio). - To investigate the efficacy of glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone, compared to glibenclamide plus placebo on early phase insulin secretion during an oral glucose tolerance test as measured by the insulinogenic index. - To define further the clinical safety and tolerability of glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone through the assessment of physical examinations, vital signs, weight, routine laboratory tests, adverse experiences and electrocardiograms (ECGs). Endpoint(s) Primary Change from baseline in the ratio (IAAT:SAT) between the intra-abdominal adipose tissue area (IAAT) and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue area [SAT] after 12 months treatment with oral glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone compared to oral glibenclamide plus placebo Secondary Comparisons will be made between glibenclamide plus rosiglitazone and glibenclamide plus placebo treatment groups on Change from baseline after 6 and 12 months treatment with respect the following: CT Scan Derived from CT image at the lumbar IV level: - abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue area [SAT] - intra-abdominal adipose tissue area [IAAT] Derived from the CT image of the right leg at the thigh level (1cm below the gluteal fold): - total subcutaneous adipose tissue area [TSAT] Derived from CT images at the lumbar IV and thigh level - ratio between abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue area [SAT] and total subcutaneous adipose tissue area of the thigh [TSAT] - ratio between intra-abdominal adipose tissue area [IAAT] and total subcutaneous adipose tissue area of the thigh [TSAT] Derived from Oral Glucose Tolerance Test, glycaemic response to OGTT, difference
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe and the United States of America (USA). The aim of this clinical trial is to compare NN5401 (insulin degludec/insulin aspart) with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin and oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs). Subjects continued their ongoing treatment with OADs in the trial.