View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the infusion of a medicinal plant (Cissus verticillata L.) would be effective in reducing glucose levels in blood and saliva of type 2 Diabetes patients.
This study will compare how well a combination of borage and echium oils will reduce inflammation compared to fish oils and placebo oil in subjects that are diabetic or have metabolic syndrome.
Primary Objective: - To describe the conditions of initiation and titration of Amaryl M, according to previous treatment: - initial dose - titration scheme - efficacy after 4 months assessed by HbA1C - tolerability (number and severity of hypoglycaemia) Secondary Objective: - Fasting Plasma Glucose - Weight evolution
The percent of glycosylated hemoglobin, also known as a hemoglobin A1C value, is the standard way that clinicians assess a patient's diabetes control. Numerous studies have shown that maintaining a hemoglobin A1C value less than 7% is associated with lower rates of diabetes-related complications. Clinicians use this value to determine whether a patient with diabetes requires changes in their disease management. The main problem with this practice is that many patients do not understand what this number means. The goal of this project is to examine ways to make feedback about glycemic control easier for patients to understand. The hope is that improved patient understanding will result in an improvement in diabetic control and thus a reduction in disease-associated complications. Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes and a hemoglobin A1C value greater than 8% within the preceding three months will be eligible for the study. Pregnant women will be excluded. Given the nature of the intervention we will also exclude patients with cognitive deficits. In this study, patients will be randomized to three groups. The first group with be told their HgbA1C value only, the second group will be told a letter grade interpretation of that value, and the third group will be shown a face. The face emotions will range from happy to sad reflecting the level of control. The main outcome will be trend in hemoglobin A1C values over time. Secondary outcomes will include patient understanding of disease state and the number of hemoglobin A1C values checked following the intervention.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States; more than 80% of veterans have > 2 risk factors for CVD. Our study is one of the first to examine the implementation of a tailored behavioral/educational self-management intervention in primary care clinics designed to improve CVD risk. The proposed study could result in a leap forward in CVD risk management among veterans for several reasons: 1) ) This is a novel extension of our previous interventions that have demonstrated improved BP, now designed to address multiple chronic conditions contributing to CVD risk, particularly hyperlipidemia and diabetes. The study focuses on both multiple CVD-related risk factor management and medication management 2) The intervention is multi-behavioral; it addresses patients' various health behavior (e.g., smoking, diet, and medication adherence). 3) Components of the intervention will include specific recommendations and transportability of intervention application software and tracking packages that will allow clinic managers to implement the intervention if it is effective.
The purpose of this simulated useability study is to demonstrate the user interface and software design mitigate potential safety concerns.
This study is a proof of concept study to confirm in a standardized manner the therapeutic efficacy of roflumilast in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
The purpose of the study is to clarify whether patients classified as Latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult (LADA) benefit from early treatment with insulin added to per oral treatment and lifestyle measures.
This trial was conducted in Europe. The aim of this study was to investigate the total exposure of NN5401 (insulin degludec/insulin aspart) in children, adolescents and adult subjects with type 1 diabetes.
High doses of gabapentin are associated with pancreatic acinar cell tumors in rats, but there has been no post marketing pancreatic carcinogenicity signal with gabapentin as reported by spontaneous reports in the Adverse Events Reporting System or in the published literature. In a published case-control screening study of the association of gabapentin with 55 cancers, the only cancer that met the screening criteria for possibly increased cancer risk with gabapentin exposure was renal (including renal pelvis) cancer. This association was judged to be likely due to or substantially accentuated by confounding by cigarette smoking, hypertension, and lifestyle (Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:1821-1835). The primary objective of this study is to determine whether exposure to gabapentin is associated with an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer or renal cancer in the United Kingdom (UK) General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Almost all members of the UK population are registered with a General Practice, which centralizes the medical information not only from the general practitioners themselves but also from specialist referrals and hospital attendances. Over 487 General Practices contribute data to the GPRD. The study cohort from which cases and controls are drawn is all subjects in the GPRD 1993-2008. Gabapentin was approved in the UK in May 1993. Entry into the study cohort begins Jan 1, 1993 for all those who are registered in GPRD before that time, and at the time of registration if later than Jan 1, 1993. Patients with a first diagnosis of the respective cancer 1995-2008 are risk set matched with up to 10 controls within the same General Practice for age at cohort entry (within two years), sex, and year of entry into the study cohort (within one year). For cases, the index date is the date of first diagnosis of the respective cancer. The index date for controls is set as the date at which the follow-up time from cohort entry is the same as the case. The index date is chosen so as to give the control equal follow-up time to that of the case for ascertainment of use of gabapentin. Cases and controls will be required to have at least 2 years of follow-up in the study cohort before their index date. Data on gabapentin prescriptions are obtained for cases and controls from study cohort entry to the index date. Crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be produced from conditional logistic regression models, with additional analyses evaluating for latency and dose-response. For pancreatic cancer, covariates are smoking, body mass index, diabetes, epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and chronic pancreatitis. For renal cancer, covariates are smoking, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, diuretic use, epilepsy, and neuropathic pain.