View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The goal of this performance evaluation is to compare the blood glucose results obtained using the VerioVue Blood Glucose Monitoring system (BGMS) with those obtained from a validated comparator method (iSTAT 1 Analyser) using blood obtained from neonates. The main question it aims to answer is: •How accurate is the VerioVue BGMS when compared to a product that has already been confirmed as accurate (iSTAT 1 Analyser) when hospital staff test blood taken from neonates on these instruments? Participants (neonates) will have a small amount of blood taken from a heel prick (performed by a HCP for medical purposes) or from an existing arterial line.
This is an open-label, single-center, single-dose study aims to evaluate the effect and safety of polymeric superparamagnetic iron oxide in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for diabetic patients with concomitant chronic kidney disease.
When all the food we eat is digested, it will increase blood glucose. Two people can have different glucose blood levels to the same food and one reason can be bacteria live in our gut. There are more than a thousand bacteria species in our gastrointestinal tract that have an important role in the proper functioning of our body, so our gut microbiome is a key piece for our nutrition and blood glucose control. Nowadays, one of the major public health concerns is the rise of people with diabetes (a disease characterized by an increase in blood glucose) and the increase in obesity, in which one of several risks is diabetes. There are multiple reasons for people develop those diseases, however, some care on diet management can prevent, delay, or improve the effects of these illnesses. Therefore, this study proposes studying the blood glucose variation between healthy volunteers and if there is a relationship between that variation and the intestinal bacteria present. These results can help doctors and nutritionists elaborate a personalized diet for people who need blood glucose level control. The investigators are recruiting volunteers aged 18 to 60, healthy, living at Florianopolis and the surroundings to participate in this crossover randomized N-of-1 study. The participants must collect fecal samples. After collection, the participants will meet the investigators and receive a kit containing ten standardized breakfasts, with two kinds of muffins, and a kit containing a glucose monitor (Abbott Freestyle Libre-CE marked) to monitor their blood sugar levels. The volunteers must have breakfast with the standardized meals and monitor the fasting glucose blood and postprandial glucose blood levels for ten consecutive days. Besides, they must take notes (like a diet diary) about all the food they ingest during the day in ten days of the study.
The objective of this study is to widely implement and evaluate the Care Transitions App in a randomized controlled trial. The app the investigators designed for patients with multiple chronic conditions has four envisioned modules: 1) falls-reduction content, 2) a digital post-discharge transitional care plan (e.g., after hospital care plan, including education, medications, follow-up appointments, warning signs to watch for, nutrition, and other care plan activities), 3) a new module for patients with MCC (diabetes, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease) including condition-specific post-discharge care plans with relevant symptom management activities, 4) a new post-discharge report module which summarizes key care transition findings and allows for patients to enter notes and questions for their providers and their own goals for recovery.
Amidst medical innovations, many Type 1 diabetes patients using advanced therapy show improved control but still suffer from diabetes-related distress. To tackle this, the investigators propose an "enhanced care" model involving healthcare providers and pharmacists. The study compares standard and enhanced care for Type 1 adults, focusing on the pharmacist's role. The main question it aims to answer is : In patients with type 1 diabetes treated with pump or closed-loop therapy, does the improved enhanced care versus conventional layout improve diabetes-related distress at 12 months? Participants will complete a monthly online questionnaire to assess their diabetes-related distress as well as their frequency of use of standard and enhanced care as well as the associated patient satisfaction.
The aim of the study is to determine whether NLRP3 inhibition with dapansutrile represents a new pharmacological option for diabetes management with potential as an anti-inflammatory agent to also address micro- and macro-vascular risk and complications from diabetes.
This study will evaluateand compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical parameters related to discomfort and wound heeling, as well as laboratory wound healing parameters after piezosurgical and conventional surgery approach during complex exodontia in healthy and patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
A pilot study to evaluate and compare glucose metrics using a real-time continuous glucose monitor (FreeStyle Libre 3 sensor) between patients with diabetes and gastroparesis and those with diabetes without gastroparesis.
A randomized remote, implementation trial in the Mass General Brigham network was performed on 200 patients with T2D at high CV or kidney risk. The study's primary objective was to create a remote diabetes management platform that improved the initiation and adherence to glucose-lowering medications with CV and kidney benefit and was evaluated by the primary outcome: increasing the proportion of patients with prescriptions for GDMT therapy by 6 months.
The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate whether a fully automated Lyumjev-and-pramlintide delivery system improves glycemic outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes. The main question we aim to answer is whether a Lyumjev-pramlintide fully closed loop system improves time in range compared to a hybrid closed loop system with carbohydrate counting. We also aim to find the optimal insulin to pramlintide ratio for glycemic control in the fully automated system. In this cross-over study, patients will undergo the following three interventions in a random order: (i) fully automated Lyumjev insulin-and-pramlintide (8 μg/u) (ii) fully automated Lyumjev insulin-and-pramlintide (10 μg/u) (iii) rapid automated Lyumjev insulin-and-placebo with carbohydrate-matched boluses For all interventions, participants will be required to wear two Ypsomed pumps programmed by our developed EuGlide system.