View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The glycemic index (GI) is used to evaluate the level of elevated blood sugar immediately after carbohydrate intake and is a classified indicator of the glycemic potential of carbohydrate-containing test foods relative to reference foods. At present, more and more clinical studies have proved that a low-GI diet is beneficial to health, and can improve blood glucose control, weight and blood lipid levels in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GI is currently widely used to provide guidance on food choices for people with diabetes. However, there are great differences in blood glucose response among different individuals after eating the same food, which is related to a variety of factors，including individual gastrointestinal digestion and absorption rate,islet function,insulin resistance and region. A large number of foreign studies suggest that race affects the determination of GI, but different regions of our country have different dietary culture and different ability to digest and absorb different foods. Therefore, the traditional GI reference value does not necessarily fully reflect the blood glucose response of diabetic patients after eating a food. In this study, continuous blood glucose monitoring was carried out through CGM to monitor the overall fluctuation level of blood glucose, the time to peak and the range of blood glucose fluctuation after eating specific foods, and to obtain individual GI, after eating different diets to guide the future diet.
Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are overrepresented in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and often have a major impact on quality of life. Typical symptoms of diabetic enteropathy include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation, faecal incontinence, and bloating. Bowel symptoms in DM are usually caused by widespread dysfunction of the GI tract, but the exact pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. Within recent years, new methods for detailed assessment of GI motility have been developed. Hence, the electromagnetic 3D-Transit system is a safe, non-invasive method for detailed description of GI motility. The system tracks the exact position of an ingested electromagnetic capsule through the entire GI tract and provides detailed information on both regional transit- and contraction patterns. High Resolution Colonic Manometry (HRCM) allows extremely detailed description of contraction patterns in the colon. The HRCM is however an invasive method, as the catheter is placed during colonoscopy. HRCM has not previously been performed on diabetic patients and 3D-Transit has only been used sparingly. Study Objectives: The purpose of this study is to obtain detailed description of colonic contractions in patients with DM and gastrointestinal symptoms, especially during fast and after meals. Hypothesis: 1. Patients with DM and GI symptoms have reduced high-amplitude, antegrade contractions in the colon when compared to healthy controls (HRCM). 2. Patients with DM and GI symptoms have reduced long, fast mass-movements when compared to healthy controls (3D-Transit). 3. The contractile response to a meal is reduced in patients with symptoms of diabetic enteropathy when compared to healthy controls. Materials and methods: 20 patients with DM type 1 or 2 and GI symptoms will be investigated simultaneously HCRM and the 3D-Transit capsule. Data will be compared to the healthy from another study (CIV-19-05-028726). A colonoscopy is performed to install the HRCM catheter and place two 3D-Transit capsules within the colon. For 24 hours, the participants lie in a bed in the research lab while pressure changes from the HRCM catheter are recorded and the 3D-Transit capsules are followed through the gastrointestinal system. Perspectives: The study will add to the very limited data available on colonic dysfunction in DM.
Placement of implants in diabetic patients is associated with higher risk of implant failure and peri-implant marginal bone loss due to an increased susceptibility to infections, impaired wound healing and associated microvascular complications. However, diabetic patients do not encounter a higher implant failure rate compared with non-diabetic patients, if the plasma glucose levels are normal. Prosthetic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla with implants is frequently compromised due to atrophy of the alveolar process and pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft is generally considered the preferred grafting material due to its osteoinductive, osteogenic, and osteoconductive properties. However, harvesting of autogenous bone graft is associated with risk of donor site morbidity and unpredictable resorption of the graft. Thus, bone substitutes, blood coagulum and platelet rich fibrin are used increasingly to simplify the surgical procedure. Fabrication of advanced platelet rich fibrin (APRF) from blood samples possess significant potential for bone regeneration without the use of additional autogenous bone grafts or bone substitutes. Consequently, use of APRF in conjunction with MSFA will avoid bone harvesting and simplify the surgical procedure. The objective is to test the H0-hypothesis of no difference in implant treatment outcome after MSFA with particulated autogenous bone graft compared with APRF. Forty consecutively insulin-dependent diabetes patients with missing posterior maxillary tooth/teeth will be allocated to implant placement and MSFA with particulated autogenous bone graft from the zygomatic buttress or APRF. Blood samples will be obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical and radiographical evaluation using periapical radiographs and CBCT will be performed preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, before abutment connection, after prosthetic rehabilitation, one year, three years and five years after loading to assess the implant treatment outcome and the volumetric changes of the augmented area. Outcome measures will include survival of suprastructures and implants, volumetric stability of the augmented area, peri-implant marginal bone level, immunological analyses of blood samples, oral health related quality of life, and complications related to the two treatment modalities.
The Patient Empowerment Study is an observational longitudinal study among adults with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). The scope of this study is to better understand how a patient's DFU disease process and usage of the Podimetrics System can impact patient health-related quality of life. Health-related quality of life will be measured by both the generic 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire and the ulcer-specific Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale Short Form (DFS-SF) questionnaire.
All across surgery specialties, wound or implant infections constitute rare, yet potentially severe complications of surgical procedure. It is considered, that glucose metabolism disorders, e.g. diabetes, are one of the main risk factors of such condition. Aim of the study The aim of the study is a prospective evaluation of glucose blood level and its variability during 2 weeks before hospitalization and 2 weeks of postoperative period in patients, that will undergo elective orthopaedic surgeries, and its impact on number of cardiovascular and orthopaedic complications. Materials and methods To this study, patients qualified for elective total knee or hip replacement in the single orthopedic center will be recruited. 100 patients will be included in this study. Every patient will be evaluated on the risk of developing diabetes mellitus in 10 years time and on the risk of death in 10 years due to the cardiovascular events. 14 days before procedure patients will have continuous glucose level measurement sensor implemented in subcutaneous tissue. After 14 days, during standard visit for stitches removal, the sensor will be removed and glycemia data will be collected. Next, patients will have their casual glucose blood level checked and surgery outcome, cardiovascular events or surgery complication risk evaluated in 3-, 6- and 12 month follow-up visits. Expected benefits of the study Results of this study may allow to define impact of orthopaedic treatment on glycemia and possible necessity to modify treatment of hyperglycemia in perioperative period in patients with Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DM2). Moreover it will allow to specify change of glucose levels and possibly implicating a need to monitor perioperative glycemia in patients without carbohydrate metabolism disorders. Additionally, the study will help to evaluate corelation between perioperative glucose blood level and the risk of cardiovascular events or surgical complications in 1-year after the procedure, which may decrease the risk of such incidents in the future (e.g. by adequate control and effective treatment of hyperglycemia), hence may result in reduction of mortality and lesser lowering of the quality of life in patients with DM2 or high risk of it.
This study will be investigating the effect of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment on glucose tolerance and low-grade inflammation. Almost a century ago, researchers proposed that diabetes (DM) was associated with increased risk of Tuberculosis infection (TB). A more recent systematic review concluded that DM increases the relative risk for TB 3.1 times. Reversely, TB may affect the glycaemic control; TB is in many cases a chronic infection characterised by long term low-grade inflammation and weight loss, and persons with TB are known to be at risk of hyperglycaemia and DM at time of diagnosis. A latent infection with the m.tuberculosis bacteria is "silent" without symptoms. 1,7 billion have LTBI on a global scale. Event though the infected person does not experience symptoms, increased background inflammation has been shown in LTBI patients in previous studies. We also know that an increase in inflammatory markers precedes clinical development of DM, and that sub-clinical inflammation contributes to insulin resistance. We hypothesise that LTBI contributes to dysregulated glucose metabolism due to increased low-grade inflammation, and that treatment will reduce low-grade inflammation and improve glucose tolerance.
To collect data in an observational study from Prediabetes (PD) and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) patients including time correlated CGM, medication and food intake approximately 80% of the time for each subject that completes the entire active phase. In addition, lifestyle and treatment already established for prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes such as: - Sleep - Exercise/Physical activity/or lack of it - Heart rate - Five hours OGTT- 6 subjects in each group that have C-Peptide positive lab result at screening and consent to the OGTT (Appendix 3) This data will address the sources and nature of blood glucose variability across the progression of PD and T2D. The data collected in this study will enable investigation into CGM-data artifacts that speak to the state and management of PD and T2D. Possible applications enabled by these data sets include: compliance with drug regimens and other lifestyle recommendations, drug titration and/or escalation/de-escalation, and diagnosis and/or treatment throughout the progression of the disease.
Using a smart device (Beprevent) to monitor activities of daily living improves the lifestyle of patients with DM2
The COVID-19 pathology is frequently associated with diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. In the epidemic outbreak that exploded at the beginning of 2020 in the Lombardy Region, about two thirds of the patients who died from COVID-19 were affected by diabetes mellitus. COVID-19 occurs in 70% of cases with an inflammatory pathology of the airways that can be fed by a cytokine storm and result in severe respiratory failure (10% cases) and death (5%). The pathophysiological molecular mechanisms are currently not clearly defined. It is hypothesized that the transmembrane glycoprotein type II CD26, known for the enzyme activity Dipeptilpeptidase 4 of the extracellular domain, may play a main role in this condition. It is in fact considerably expressed at the level of parenchyma and pulmonary interstitium and carries out both systemic and paracrine enzymatic activity, modulating the function of various proinflammatory cytokines, growth factors and vasoactive peptides in the deep respiratory tract. Of particular interest is the fact that Dipeptilpeptidase 4 has been identified as a cellular receptor for S glycoprotein of MERS-COV. In the case of the SARS-COV 2 virus, the main receptor is the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 protein, but a possible interaction with Dipeptilpeptidase 4 also cannot be excluded. The selective blockade of Dipeptilpeptidase 4 could therefore favorably modulate the pulmonary inflammatory response in the subject affected by COVID-19. This protein is also known for the enzymatic degradation function of the native glucagon-like peptide 1, one of the main regulators of insulin secretion. This is why it is a molecular target in the treatment of diabetes (drugs that selectively inhibit Dipeptilpeptidase 4 are marketed with an indication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes). It is believed that the use of a Dipeptilpeptidase 4 inhibitor in people with diabetes and hospitalized for Covid-19 may be safe and of particular interest for an evaluation of the effects on laboratory and instrumental indicators of inflammatory lung disease. Among the drugs that selectively block Dipeptilpeptidase 4, the one with the greatest affinity is Sitagliptin.
Diabetic patients who have long-term insulin used can product antibody against exogenous insulin, the investigators named this condition Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAs). Exogenous insulin antibody can cause blood glucose fluctuation, high blood glucose and refractory hypoglycemia, and have a serious impact on the health of diabetic patients. After adding glucocorticoid, some EIAs patients can reduce insulin dosage, correct hypoglycemia, even eliminate insulin antibody in about half a year, and achieve the goal of blood glucose stability. But up to now, there is no study to evaluate the improvement of blood glucose by glucocorticoid intervention in EIAS patients receiving insulin therapy. This project plans to collect 20 cases of EIAS and carry out a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the improvement of blood glucose by glucocorticoid intervention.