View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to collect information on how semaglutide works in real world patients. Participants will get semaglutide prescribed by the study doctor. The study will last for about 6 to 8 months. Participants will be asked to complete some questionnaires about the health and the diabetes treatment. Participants will complete these during the normally scheduled visits with the study doctor.
This study evaluates the overall cardiovascular risk status and best predictors of optimal metabolic control of Turkish adult patients with diabetes mellitus.
In diabetes Type II the xerostomia is a quite frequent symptom. In evaluating the activity of an artificial saliva spray compared to a water gel in patients with Diabetes Type II patients had to follow a three day treatment with each product. Whereas after the first treatment period the two groups had to follow a wash out period of three days before the second treatment period could begin. The artificial saliva spray reduced the xerostomia and the inflammation or the oral tissue.
The purpose of this study is to collect information about Fiasp® to evaluate how effective Fiasp® is in treating elevated blood sugar in patients with type 1 diabetes, compared with the participant's previous insulin treatment. The study will also assess how satisfied the participants are with the treatment with Fiasp® and the impact of the treatment on quality of life. The study has also been set up to learn more about how effective Fiasp® is in controlling the glucose levels during the day and night. The duration of the study is expected to be approximately 2 years. The participation is expected to be approximately 6-8 months for each patient.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the mechanism behind the anti-atherogenic effects of liraglutide. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel trial we will included 100 patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to an active treatment period of 26 weeks or placebo for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint is change from baseline to week 26 in vascular inflammation, assessed by Flour Deoxy Glucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)
Two forms of insulin lispro (LY900014 and Humalog®) and two forms of insulin aspart (NovoRapid® and Fiasp®) will be given to trial participants with diabetes mellitus type 1 by injection under the skin. The study will assess how fast the active ingredient (insulin lispro or insulin aspart) gets into the blood stream and how long it takes the body to remove it. A test meal will be given to trial participants to assess the course of the blood sugar lowering effect of the investigational products. The safety and tolerability of LY900014 will also be assessed. Screening is required within 14 days prior to the lead in. For each participant, the study will last up to 91 days.
This is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm, post-approval study of the FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System intended to characterize the safety of the Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System when used in people with diabetes.
Sphingolipids are associated with metabolic diseases. Distribution of plasma sphingolipids in type 1 and type 2 diabetes has never been studied. The objective of the CERADIAB study is to compare plasma sphingoliplids concentrations in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients.
The proposed project will develop, implement, and test methodology for the design of an acceptable, effective intervention for diabetes prevention in a real-world setting. By determining the effectiveness of the intervention, the study will serve to guide the translation of research into routine public health prevention programs and policy. And, the hands-on experience will directly support the development of expertise, tools and training to advance translational science as a discipline. The study aims to test the effectiveness of an environmental and individual level intervention to prevent diabetes at Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital (DH-KUH), Nepal. Specific aims are to measure: Effectiveness of a canteen intervention on a composite score based upon improvement in 3 cardio-metabolic risk factors (0-3) [HbA1c decrease ≥0.5%; a systolic blood pressure decrease (SBP) ≥5 mm Hg; and plasma triglycerides decrease ≥10 mg/dl] Effectiveness of a behavioral intervention on a composite score based upon improvement in 3 cardio-metabolic risk factors (0-3) [HbA1c decrease ≥0.5%; SBP decrease ≥5 mm Hg; and plasma triglycerides decrease ≥10 mg/dl] Effectiveness of a canteen intervention on change in HbA1C and healthy food intake after six months of the canteen only (CO) intervention compared to the change over six months during the control period. Effectiveness of a behavioral intervention on change in Hba1c and healthy food intake after six months of behavioral intervention plus the canteen (CB) intervention compared to the change over six months during CO. We will recruit 366 adult employees of DH-KUH. At baseline (T1), 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3) and 18 months (T4), we will administer a standard questionnaire to record relevant characteristics of the participants (age, sex, education, income, marital status, and family history of CVD, physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake and diet). We will abstract food consumption data from the administrative database in DH-KUH. Blood samples will be collected and analyzed for HbA1c, fasting glucose, and lipid profile (HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, triglycerides). We will measure height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, and blood pressure. After 6 months of control period, the participants will receive the canteen intervention: (a) form and train a canteen improvement team; (b) train canteen staff on healthy cooking; (c) add healthy food and remove unhealthy food; (d) information and communication of canteen changes to employees; (e) monitoring of the interventions. After six months of the canteen intervention, half of the participants will be randomized to receive the behavioral intervention. The behavior intervention will be a combination of intensive education sessions, group counselling, goal setting and monitoring based on the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). The primary analysis will use χ^2test use to compare (a) Proportion of individual with score ≥ 2 during CO intervention to the proportion of individual with score ≥ 2 during the control period; (b) Proportion of individual with score ≥ 2 during CB intervention to the proportion of individual with score ≥ 2 during CO intervention. We will conduct a logistic regression with the proportion of individual with score ≥ 2 as outcome and CO vs CB as exposure at T4. Secondary analysis will use paired t-test to compare (a) the change in healthy food intake and HbA1c during CO to the change in healthy food intake and HbA1C during the control period (b) the change in healthy food intake and HbA1C% during CB to the change in healthy food intake and HbA1C% during CO period. We will conduct linear regression with HbA1c% as the outcome and CO vs CB as the exposure variable at T4. Further analysis will adjust for confounding in time-varying variables and assess effect modification.
The objective of this study was to evaluate vitamin B deficiency (particularly vitamin B6 deficiency) in diabetic patients in Germany in relation to the presence or absence of proteinuria, and global vascular risk.