View clinical trials related to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to learn more about the safety and efficacy of tirzepatide compared to placebo in children or teenagers with type 2 diabetes taking metformin, or basal insulin, or both. The overall study will last about 60 weeks with up to 14 clinic visits and 6 phone visits. Clinic visits will include blood sample collection, physical exam and questionnaire.
T2DM is a complex disorder which has major health, social and economic consequences. Its chronic hyperglycaemia is associated with macro- and micro-vascular complications and even death. The prevalence of T2DM in Nepal is high. In Nepal, Ayurveda is the dominant traditional medical system and is in use for thousands of years, especially for meeting the primary healthcare needs. Lack of availability of western medical system doctors in rural areas is another reason. In recognition of these facts, the Nepalese government actively promotes Ayurveda and deploys Ayurvedic practitioners in PHCs, often as the main clinical provider. This is a two-arm, feasibility cluster RCT with blinded outcome assessment and integrated qualitative process evaluation will be conducted in 12 Ayurvedic Primary Health Care Center Participants who are aged 18 years or above, new T2DM patients (i.e., treatment naïve), diagnosed by the participating Ayurvedic practitioner and able to provide written informed consent will be enrolled in the study. Each participant will be involved in the study for six months. Patient will be assessed for Glycated haemoglobin, Lipid Profile, Physiological parameters like heart rate and pulse rate, Anthropometric parameters, EuroQol-5D-5L
We hypothesize that the combination of a nutritional education intervention with a physical exercise program improves appetite regulation mediated by exosomes in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), leading to better glycaemia/insulinaemia levels, reduction of body fat mass and quality of life. The project is a randomized controlled clinical trial in 120 participants with T2DM and obesity, which aims to determine the efficacy of a nutritional education program and the role of physical exercise type on health related variables. The participants will be of both sexes with age between 40 and 55 years, belonging to the Province of Cádiz. The design has two 12-week interventions; the main factor has 2 levels: participants who receive the nutritional education (EDU) and controls (CG); the second factor has 3 levels: high-intensity interval training (HIIT), moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), and controls (INACT). Therefore, participants will be randomized into 6 groups (n=20), adjusted by gender (≈50% in each group): EDU+HIIT, EDU+MICT, EDU+INACT, CG+HIIT, CG+MICT, CG+INACT. The outcome variables, which will be measured before and after the intervention, will include: dietary intake assessment, physical activity assessment, quality of life, blood samples, emotional reactivity to food images, blood pressure, appetite assessment, body composition and fluids, basal metabolism, maximal fat oxidation test and cardiorespiratory fitness.
This study will compare the new medicine IcoSema, which is a combination of insulin icodec and semaglutide, taken once a week, to semaglutide taken once a week in people with type 2 diabetes. The study will look at how well IcoSema controls blood sugar level in people with type 2 diabetes compared to semaglutide. Participants will either get IcoSema or semaglutide. Which treatment participants get is decided by chance. IcoSema is a new medicine that doctors cannot prescribe. Doctors can already prescribe semaglutide in many countries. Participants will get IcoSema or semaglutide, which they must inject once a week with a pen, which has a small needle, in a skin fold in the thigh, upper arm, or stomach. The study will last for about 1 year and 1 month. Participants will have 18 clinic visits, 34 phone/video calls with the study doctor, and 4 contacts with the site that can either be clinic visits or phone/video calls. At 11 clinic visits participants will have blood samples taken. At 7 clinic visits participants cannot eat or drink (except for water) for 8 hours before the visit. Women cannot take part if pregnant, breast-feeding or plan to get pregnant during the study period.
This randomized pilot trial of the Diabetes Homeless Medication Support intervention vs. brief diabetes education will test the perception and feasibility of anticipated study procedures and refine randomization and blinding.
With the rise of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and diabetes, the global disease burden is shifting towards non-communicable diseases (NCDs). An increasing number of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are currently experiencing the double burden of infectious and non-communicable diseases. In order to facilitate a patient-centred approach to healthcare, there is an urgent need to ensure that primary healthcare (PHC) facilities in LMICs are capable of addressing diagnosis and monitoring of non-communicable diseases at the point-of-care (POC). Important minimum parameters for PHC POC diagnosis and monitoring of cardiometabolic diseases are lipids/lipoproteins, glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum creatinine, to address cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. While several technologies of multi-parameter POC devices capable of supporting diagnosis and monitoring of cardiometabolic diseases exist, their quantitative accuracy is often not well evaluated outside of the manufacturer's laboratories and published independent evaluations can be rare, particularly in the settings of intended use. These settings are PHC facilities in varying climatic environments and with staff without specialist laboratory training. Our study aims to evaluate the quantitative accuracy of 2 cardiometabolic POC devices in a setting of intended use and performed by the intended user. (Evaluating the quantitative measurements of glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol and creatinine as measured in a healthcare setting with point-of-care multiparameter devices compared to a laboratory reference method).
Non-adherence is defined as: "the extent to which a person's behaviour - taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider". Non-adherence in chronic cardiometabolic diseases including diabetes is very common and is often the primary reason for treatment failure. This leads to significant excess costs to the health economy through avoidable investigations, treatment escalations, hospital admissions, and disease complications. Methods to diagnose non-adherence have until recently been poor. We have recently developed an objective and robust chemical adherence test to detect the presence of 160 cardiovascular medications in urine using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Chemical adherence testing has not been utilised in people with diabetes, further its relationship with other measures of adherence is unknown. The main aim of this observational study is to compare chemical non-adherence with other commonly used measures of non-adherence in people with diabetes. Chemical testing for non-adherence will be performed using urine provided by 600 patients with poorly controlled diabetes attending primary care recruited over a 15-month period. Participants will also be required to complete a self- reported questionnaire and pharmacy records will be reviewed to ascertain prescription refill rates. The prevalence and metabolic control of non-adherence as diagnosed chemically will be compared with those obtained by pharmacy refill rates and patient self-reported questionnaires. Further, the determinants of non-adherence as ascertained by urine LC-MS/MS analysis will be studied. It is hoped that this innovative study will lead to further larger intervention studies that will change the management of non-adherence in diabetes.
Despite the development of novel treatments, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death and disability. It has been observed in clinical practice, that the use of novel glycemia-lowering therapies with cardioprotective features remains profoundly low despite proven efficacy. It has been proposed that such low uptake is more related to insurance type and coverage than to risk assessment. While it can be easy to blame prescribing deficiencies on complacent physicians and/or over-frugal payors, SomaLogic believes there is more likely to be a fundamental problem with the cost and risk-effective allocation of such therapies, which are neither low in cost nor free of adverse events. As current clinical trials and guidelines tend to "bundle" participants together, there is an absence of individualized assessment of residual cardiovascular risk. This leads to physicians, participants, and payors being relatively uninformed as to the need for and/or likely benefits of such therapies in an individual. Simply giving every eligible participant a drug regardless of residual risk would be unaffordable and would create adverse effects and costs for people at low residual risk who might not actually benefit from the drugs. To resolve this lack of precision in risk assessment, SomaLogic has performed the largest ever proteomic program to date with over 36,000 samples from 26,000 participants in eleven clinical studies, for a total of over 180,000,000 protein measurements, to develop and validate a surrogate proteomic endpoint for cardiovascular outcomes. The SomaSignal Cardiovascular Risk (SSCVR) test, a 27-protein model encompassing ten biological systems.
The aim of this study is to understand if the timing of exercise around food intake can help improve blood sugar management in pregnant individuals with diabetes.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes and glucose control metrics of critically ill patients with previously undiagnosed diabetes compared to those with known diabetes at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).