There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Liver transplantation is a lifesaving procedure; however, there are chances that the body may reject the organ following liver transplantation, and this remains a significant concern. This rejection of the transplanted, healthy liver tissue further adds to the patient's illness and also increases the related costs of treatment. Currently, liver biopsy is the standard procedure used for diagnosing this rejection. Being an invasive procedure (requiring the introduction of instruments into the body), this procedure also increases the chances of death of the patient. Researchers are looking into the identification of testing methods that can act as a sign of this rejection without requiring the introduction of instruments into the body. This type of testing could also allow for adjusting the doses of drugs given to the patient to decrease the chances of graft failure. A particular event that occurs during rejection in the body is the death of liver cells. Thus, tracking cell death using a blood test would be an important tool in assessing rejection. CK-18 is a protein in the liver cells that is thought to be linked to the changes occurring as a result of cell death. This study will be looking into a new idea of measuring CK-18 levels and compare them to an existing index to develop a reliable test for liver transplant rejection without introducing any instruments into the body. The purpose of this research study is to assess the history and collect blood samples to be tested for measuring CK-18 levels and assess certain other markers in the blood.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare 2 different timepoints for clamping the umbilical cord at birth for term-born infants with a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Does Delayed Cord Clamping at 120 seconds (DCC-120) or Delayed Cord Clamping at 30 seconds (DCC-30) after birth lead to better health outcomes? - Does DCC-120 seconds or DCC-30 seconds after birth lead to better neuromotor outcomes at 22-26 months of infant age (postnatal)? Participants will be asked to do the following: - Participate in either DCC-120 or DCC-30 at birth (randomized assignment). - Complete General Movements Assessment (GMA) at 3-4 months of infant age (postnatal), complete questionnaires / surveys at this time. - Complete questionnaires / surveys at 9-12 months of infant age (postnatal). - Complete Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE), Developmental Assessment of Young Children 2 Edition (DAYC-2), and questionnaires / surveys at 22-26 months of infant age (postnatal). - Permit data collection from electronic medical records for both the mother and infant study participants. Investigators will compare DCC-120 vs. DCC-30 to see which approach is more beneficial to both the mother and baby with CHD.
In this study, the Sponsor wants to evaluate the performance and accuracy of the PJI Panel compared to the currently used multiple-criterion scoring systems for the diagnosis of PJI.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if the study drug, CIN-103, can help reduce the symptoms associated with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) in adult patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To evaluate the efficacy of CIN-103 on symptoms of IBS-D when given to patients with IBS-D compared to a placebo. - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of CIN-103 when given to patients with IBS-D compared to a placebo Participants will attend the following visits: - Screening Period (1 Visit) - Baseline Period (1 Visit) - Will complete daily diary and other Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) as described in the protocol to assess eligibility for continued participation. - 12-Week Treatment Period (5 Visits) - Study drug taken twice daily by mouth. - Will complete daily diaries and other PROs as described in the protocol. - Follow- Up Period (1 Visit) Researchers will compare CIN-103 Dose 1, CIN-103 Dose 2, and placebo, to evaluate the clinical response to multiple dose strengths of CIN-103 relative to placebo on abdominal pain and stool consistency along with safety and tolerability.
The main purpose of this first-in-human study to investigate the safety of LY3839840 in single and multiple doses, and how it's processed in the body when given in different amounts.
In this prospective Phase 2, single-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study, approximately 70 subjects with allergic conjunctivitis will be randomized 1:1 to receive either TL-925 or placebo as topical ophthalmic eye drops administered bilaterally. The study comprises of a screening and treatment period using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate TL-925 for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
The primary aim of this trial is to assess blinding following simulated/sham or genuine/real high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA) manual chiropractic adjustments.
The purpose of this study is to assess BMS-986453 in participants with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
The purpose of this study is to study the use of a new type of d-PTFE membrane called reinforced PTFE Mesh (RPM) with dental surgery. The regenerative outcomes of RPM membranes and collagen membrane for surgical reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis (gum disease around implants) will be compared.
The primary purpose of this hybrid comparative effectiveness and implementation study is to compare two self-management strategies to manage pain, and adjust work-related ergonomic risk in nursery and landscape workers. This cluster randomized pragmatic study will compare interventions with different degrees of support and Specific aim 1 is to determine if self-management plus individualized guided participatory ergonomic choices (SM+PE) is more effective than self-management (SM) alone for improving LBP among horticulture workers. Both groups will review short self-management video modules to introduce general pain concepts and the importance of managing pain without medication, risks of opioid use, self-management of pain, and simple ergonomic strategies for both groups. Both groups will choose 1 self-management strategy to manage pain at home and 1 ergonomic workplace strategy to limit pain. The SM+PE participant's choices will be guided by researchers to match to their self-identified most difficult work activities due to pain and to those strategies that could be used more often rather than just their preferences. This group will also: 1) review videos of their work tasks, and 2) receive text reminders to support implementation. Surveys will include instruments reflecting low back pain disability, pain, work ability, and affective or cognitive characteristics (self-efficacy, pain anxiety, depression, coping), collected at baseline, pre- and post-intervention, with follow-ups at 3- and 6-months. Workers will be videoed pre- and post-intervention to inform simulated work analysis for calculation of work risk and to compare any changes for the most difficult tasks. Specific aim 2 will identify contextual factors impacting engagement, adoption, effectiveness, and implementation. Interviews, focus groups, and field notes will be used to explain results and establish patterns to inform future translation.