There are about 6461 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Russian Federation. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Study is to compare antifungal prophylaxis of Voriconazole and Itraconazole in subjects who have had a Stem Cell Transplant. The success of the end point will be measured using evidence of Infection, drug compliance and survival.
This study assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 2 doses of oral fingolimod (1.25 mg/day and 0.5 mg/day) compared to placebo in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)
The purpose of this clinical research study is to evaluate the Best Overall Response Rate (BORR), (as per modified WHO criteria) in patients with previously treated melanoma-Stage III (unresectable) or Stage IV melanoma receiving 10 mg/kg of ipilimumab. The safety of this product will also be evaluated.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of GW685698X 100mcg once daily (QD) aqueous nasal spray with vehicle placebo nasal spray in adult and adolescent subjects (12 years of age and older) with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).
The aim of this study is to assess longer term safety and effectiveness of Dysport®.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of soluble beta-1,3/1,6-glucan compared to placebo on the healing of chronic leg ulcers in diabetes patients. Hypothesis: Through its ability to activate tissue macrophages and counteract diabetes-associated defects in macrophages, the soluble beta-1,3/1,6-glucan will promote the healing of leg ulcers in diabetic patients.
Primary: Effect on HbA1c over 48 weeks in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes Secondary: Effect on glucose, total daily insulin dose, body weight, waist circumference, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides - Safety, tolerability
The primary objective is to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of 4 different AVE 7688 doses on the change from baseline in trough diastolic blood pressure at the end of week 12. The secondary objectives are: - To assess the antihypertensive efficacy of 4 different AVE 7688 doses on the change from baseline in trough systolic blood pressure at the end of week 12 - To compare the percentages of responders after 12 week of treatment - To evaluate the long term safety and tolerability of AVE 7688 with particular attention to angioedema
This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III study in participants at high risk of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. The study will investigate - Treatment with docetaxel (TAXOTERE®) every three weeks (q3w) plus leuprolide acetate (ELIGARD®) versus leuprolide acetate alone (ELIGARD®) - Immediate treatment following prostatectomy versus deferred treatment at the time of relapse Using a 2x2 factorial design participants will therefore be randomized to - Immediate adjuvant treatment with docetaxel plus leuprolide acetate (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy) - Immediate adjuvant treatment with leuprolide acetate alone (hormonal therapy) - Deferred treatment with docetaxel plus leuprolide acetate (chemotherapy and hormonal therapy) - Deferred treatment with leuprolide acetate alone (hormonal therapy) Primary Objective: - The primary objective of the study is to compare progression-free survival using a 2x2 factorial design Secondary Objectives: - To compare the 5-year overall, cancer-specific and metastasis-free survival after systemic treatment between the groups - To compare the safety and tolerability between Docetaxel in combination with leuprolide acetate and leuprolide acetate alone. - To evaluate quality of life as measured by the FACT-P questionnaire. Originally, 1696 participants were planned in the study (with 424 participants randomized to each arm). However, only a total of 211 participants completed the randomization procedure as of 26 September 2007. Thus, sanofi-aventis, in accordance with the Steering Committee, decided to stop the participant recruitment as of 26 September 2007. Participants who had already signed their Informed Consent (IC) before September 26, 2007 were allowed to enter the randomization if they met eligibility criteria. The final revised number of planned participants to be randomly assigned to the 4 treatment arms was 250, and 228 participants were actually randomized. The final sample size did not allow all the statistical analyses to be conducted on efficacy data. Therefore, the protocol was amended to reflect the change in the plans for statistical analysis. The study was underpowered to serve as the basis for drawing conclusions regarding efficacy and quality of life (QoL) endpoints.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase III study to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Lapatinib + Paclitaxel versus Placebo + Paclitaxel in men and women with ErbB2 amplified metastatic (Stage IV) breast cancer who had not received prior therapy for metastatic disease.