Clinical Trials Logo

Filter by:
NCT ID: NCT01262677 Completed - Epilepsies, Partial Clinical Trials

Once-A-Day Pregabalin For Partial Seizures

Start date: February 17, 2011
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Approximately 30% percent of subjects with partial seizures are refractory to treatment with single or combination antiepileptic drugs. The present study will compare the efficacy of two different dosages of pregabalin CR dosed once daily as compared to placebo, when used as adjunctive therapy in subjects requiring adjunctive therapy for partial onset epilepsy, using a randomized, parallel group design.

NCT ID: NCT01262365 Completed - Clinical trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Study of Epratuzumab Versus Placebo in Subjects With Moderate to Severe General Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

EMBODY1
Start date: December 2010
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of the study is to confirm the clinical efficacy of epratuzumab in the treatment of subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

NCT ID: NCT01261793 Completed - Clinical trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Study of Epratuzumab Versus Placebo in Subjects With Moderate to Severe General Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

EMBODY2
Start date: December 2010
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of the study is to confirm the clinical efficacy of epratuzumab in the treatment of subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE).

NCT ID: NCT01261611 Completed - Cervical Dystonia Clinical Trials

Study Comparing Short Term Efficacy of Dysport and Dysport NG to Placebo, and to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Dysport NG of Subjects With Cervical Dystonia

Start date: April 2011
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well a new drug called Dysport NG works and how safe it is, when it is used for the treatment of cervical dystonia. Dysport NG will be compared to an approved drug called Dysport.

NCT ID: NCT01261325 Completed - Epilepsy Clinical Trials

Brivaracetam Efficacy and Safety Study in Subjects With Partial Onset Seizures

BRITE
Start date: December 2010
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of brivaracetam at doses of 100 and 200mg/day compared to placebo as adjunctive treatment in adult focal epilepsy subjects with partial onset seizures not fully controlled despite current treatment with 1 or 2 concomitant antiepileptic drugs.

NCT ID: NCT01261273 Completed - Clinical trials for Coronary Artery Disease

e-NOBORI Observational Registry of Nobori DES

e-NOBORI
Start date: August 25, 2010
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Title Prospective, single-arm, multi-centre, observational registry to further validate safety and efficacy of the Nobori® DES in real-world patients. Objective Primary objective The primary objective of e-NOBORI registry is to further validate the safety and efficacy of Nobori® DES system in unselected patients representing everyday clinical practice. Primary Endpoint: Freedom from Target Lesion Failure (TLF) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year

NCT ID: NCT01258738 Completed - Clinical trials for Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Study Comparing Etanercept (ETN) Against a Placebo for Etanercept on a Background Nonsteroidal Anti Inflammatory Drug (NSAIDs) in the Treatment of Early Spondyloarthritis (SpA) Patients Who do Not Have X-ray Structural Changes

EMBARK
Start date: February 2011
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

This is a two part study. During period one there will be a comparison of Etanercept (ETN) against a placebo with both arms maintaining the background anti inflammatory drug prescribed by their Physician. The hypothesis is that Etanercept will be superior to the placebo arm as determined by the proportion of subjects achieving Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS)40 improvement at 12 weeks. This will be followed by 92 weeks extension where everyone in the trial receives Etanercept (ETN) and a background non steroidal anti inflammatory drug(NSAID).

NCT ID: NCT01258608 Completed - Clinical trials for Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Study of Mapatumumab in Combination With Sorafenib in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Start date: February 8, 2011
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Mapatumumab is a fully human, agonist monoclonal antibody that activates the cell death pathway in tumor cells by specifically binding to TRAIL-R1 with high affinity. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, is the standard of care for treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The mechanisms of sorafenib and mapatumumab action suggest that these agents could interact synergistically. This is a Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab in combination with sorafenib in subjects with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

NCT ID: NCT01258153 Completed - Infantile Colic Clinical Trials

Preliminary Efficacy and Safety Study of Oral Nepadutant in Infant Colic

no-cry
Start date: November 2010
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This phase IIa study is designed as a multi-centre, multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study in three parallel groups, with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nepadutant given at two oral doses once daily for seven days in comparison to placebo in the treatment of infantile colic.

NCT ID: NCT01257230 Completed - Asthma Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Safety of 2 Doses of Tiotropium Via Respimat Compared to Placebo in Adolescents With Moderate Persistent Asthma

Start date: December 2010
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of a 48-week treatment with two doses of tiotropium bromide compared to placebo in adolescent patients with moderate persistent asthma. Efficacy and safety will be assessed by measuring lung function parameters and evaluating the effects on asthma exacerbations, on Quality of life, on health care resource utilisation an on the number of adverse events.