There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Study CKJX839B12302 is a pivotal Phase III trial to evaluate the benefits of inclisiran on major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) events in participants with established cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Ischemic strokes are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In 20% of cases they are caused by the rupture of atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries. Risk estimation of plaque rupture is currently suboptimal. Although pathology studies have shown that plaque composition provides a better risk assessment (lipid-rich core with thin fibrous cap = high risk (unstable plaque); fibrous core and a thick fibrous cap = low risk (stable plaque)), plaque composition cannot be determined using imaging techniques, and can therefore not be assessed non-invasively. Ultrasound, which is already widely used in clinical practice to determine plaque geometry could be an optimal technique to determine plaque composition and monitor plaques in a large population, due to its low patient burden, relatively low cost and speed of measurement. However, using conventional ultrasound it is not possible to reliably determine plaque composition. However, this might be possible using newly developed ultrasound functionalities(shear wave and strain elastography) enabling tissue stiffness estimation. It is known that recurrence risk is greatest in the first week after a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and decreases afterwards, probably due to a stabilization of the plaque due to a change in composition. Additionally, lipid-lowering medication is known to further reduce the recurrence risk after such an event, probably due to an acceleration of the stabilization process of the plaque. In this study, the investigators want to investigate whether Ultra-COMPASS ultrasound measurements (a combination of shear wave and strain elastography and ultrafast compounding (a fast variant of standard anatomical ultrasound to determine plaque geometry)) could be used to determine changes in plaque composition after a stroke / TIA. Primary objective: Investigate whether it is possible to detect plaque stabilization, determined by plaque stiffness, after a brain infarction or transient ischemic attack with Ultra-COMPASS ultrasound measurements. Secundary objectives: - Determine the association between (changes in) Ultra-COMPASS measurements and the lipid-lowering drugs used 6 and 12 weeks after ischemic stroke. - Determine the association between Ultra-COMPASS measurements and recurrent cardiovascular events (TIA / cerebral infarction / myocardial infarction/death) 6 and 12 weeks after ischemic stroke. - Determine the association between Ultra-COMPASS measurements and (changes in) low-density lipoprotein levels 6 and 12 weeks after ischemic stroke (if known). Study design: This is a prospective, longitudinal, observational, single-center cohort study in patients after a cerebral infarction or TIA with stenosis of one / both carotid arteries of 30-70% that receive or start withcholesterol-lowering medication. Ultra-COMPASS measurements will be taken within 7 days after brain infarction/TIA and at 6 ± 1 and after 12 ± 1 weeks in both carotid arteries to see if plaques stabilize overtime and to what extent medication stimulates a beneficial change in plaque composition.
This phase 3 randomized, open-label multicenter trial will compare the efficacy, safety and the impact on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) of SPd versus EloPd in pomalidomide-naïve patients with MM who have received 1 to 4 prior anti-MM regimens and been treated with an immunomodulatory imide drug (IMiD), proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb).
The GPS Registry is a multi-centre, single-arm, non-interventional (observational) registry. In addition to collecting data from patients treated as per standard clinical practice, the Registry will also regularly collect telemetric Home Blood Pressure (HBP) measurements and Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) data via a standardized quality of life questionnaire. The objective of the GPS Registry is to document the long-term safety and effectiveness of the commercially available Paradise Ultrasound Renal Denervation System when used per its labelling in patients deemed to be candidates for RDN as per physician's assessment.
Summary Rationale: The diaphragm is a dome-shaped muscle which separates the thoracic cavity from the abdomen. In patients with diaphragm paralysis the treatment (surgery versus non-invasive ventilation) is based on physician preference, not sound scientific evidence. Clearly studies are needed to guide a scientific decision making. Objective: In this pilot study the we want to know the clinical relevant effect of both therapies on EQ-5D_5L, the latter being the primary outcome. Finally, it will show the investigators the costs of both therapies form a societal perspective. Study design: open-label, multi center intervention pilot study Study population: 20 participants >18 year and diagnosed with a unilateral diaphragm paralysis resulting from phrenic nerve injury. Intervention: 10 participants for surgical plication and 10 participants for nocturnal non-invasive ventilation while on the wating list for surgical plication. Main study parameters/endpoints: The goal of the pilot study is to describe the effect of both plication and NIV on the endpoints of the intended efficiency study. The intended primary endpoint is quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Secondary endpoints are; the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, the Diaphragmatic Paralysis Questionnaire, Borg dyspnoea score, 6 minute walk test, spirometry in both sitting and supine position, a polysomnography and transcutaneous measurement of carbon dioxide an oxygen saturation at night.
Background: Currently the dietary intake patterns of children do not meet the prescribed dietary guidelines. Consequently childhood obesity is one of the most serious health concerns. Therefore, innovative methods need to be developed and tested in order to effectively improve the dietary intake of children. Learning children how to cope with the overwhelming number of unhealthy food cues could be conducted effectively by serious health games. Objective: The main aim of this study was to examine the effect of a serious health computer game on young children's eating behavior and attitudes towards healthy and unhealthy foods. Methods: A cluster-randomized controlled trial with a between-subject design was conducted (N=157; 8-12 years), whereby children played a game that promoted a healthy lifestyle or were in the control condition. Children in the control condition attended regular classes and did not play a game. The game was designed in collaboration with researchers and pilot-tested before conducting the experiment among a group of children repeatedly. After one week of playing, attitudes towards food snacks and actual intake was assessed, whereby children could eat at libitum from fruits or energy-dense snacks.
This study is conducted to see if ziltivekimab reduces the risk of having cardiovascular events (for example heart attack and stroke) in people with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and inflammation. Participants will either get ziltivekimab (active medicine) or placebo (a dummy medicine which has no effect on the body). This is known as the study medicine. Which treatment participants get is decided by chance. Participants chance of getting ziltivekimab or placebo is the same. Ziltivekimab is not yet approved in any country or region in the world. It is a new medicine doctors cannot prescribe. Participants will get the study medicine in a pre filled syringe. Participants will need to use the pre filled syringe to inject the study medicine into a skinfold once-monthly. The study is expected to last for up to 4 years. Participants will have up to 20 clinic visits. Participants will have blood and urine samples taken at most of the clinic visits. Participants will have their heart examined using sound waves (echocardiography) and electrodes (electrocardiogram). Women cannot take part if pregnant, breast-feeding or planning to get pregnant during the study period.
The Phoenix Trial is a randomized double blind placebo controlled Phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AMX0035 for treatment of ALS
Adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids and pigmented glia (ALSP) is a rare, rapidly progressing, genetic, neurodegenerative disease for which no definitive treatment options and limited information on the natural history of the disease are available. The structural, genetic, and neuropathophysiological abnormalities of ALSP lead to the onset of neurologic symptoms, such as moderate to severe motor and neuropsychiatric impairments. This natural history study will collect data to contribute to the development of future novel therapies that focus on the neuropathophysiological features that underlie ALSP and that are essential to reverse, delay, or stop progression of this debilitating disorder.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody elranatamab, alone and/or in combination with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, daratumumab, can provide more benefit to people with multiple myeloma compared to a combination therapy including daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone. People with multiple myeloma who have received previous treatment including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor will be enrolled in the study. Part 1 of the study will assess the safety and activity of different doses of elranatamab in combination with daratumumab. People participating in Part 2 of the study will be randomly assigned to receive either elranatamab alone, elranatamab plus daratumumab, or daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone. Part 2 will compare the safety and activity of (1) elranatamab alone compared to daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone, and (2) elranatamab plus daratumumab compared to daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone. Participants in all parts of the study will receive study treatment until their disease progresses, they experience unacceptable side effects, or they choose to no longer participate in the study.