There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Palliative Sedation (PS) is defined as the intentional lowering of consciousness of a patient in the last phase of life, to relieve patients suffering from refractory symptoms. For those symptoms all possible effective treatments, within an acceptable timeframe, are exhausted. Several studies have been performed about palliative sedation, mostly focusing on continuous deep sedation, with the use of various measurements to monitor its effect. Efficacy of continuous palliative sedation has been monitored by agitation/distress levels, symptom control, levels of sedation/awareness, comfort, safety and family/caregivers satisfaction. Differences between studies occur, for instance in definition, application and monitoring. Consequently reported outcomes and associated treatment goals differ between studies which makes it difficult to compare the results. Within this international multicenter observational study, the investigators aim to evaluate the effects of palliative sedation on patient's comfort levels. Participants with different forms and intensity of palliative sedation (intermittent and continuous, from light to deep) are included in a prospective design as part of an international study. Objectives: 1. To evaluate the effect of palliative sedation on participants' comfort and other symptoms in different international hospices, palliative care units and hospital ward settings. 2. To assess the clinical practice of palliative sedation in different international care settings and the accompanying costs and consequences. Study design: Prospective observational multicentre study in hospices, palliative care units and hospital ward settings in five European countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, The Netherlands).
To facilitate the follow-up of urothelial tumors and also make them more tolerable and less invasive for patients, there is a minimally invasive and easy to perform examination which is urinary cytology on 3 samples. This test is extremely specific, over 90% chance of cancer if it is positive and is performed by expert cytopathologists, but it is burdened by a very low sensitivity, which is especially acute in the case of low grade tumors. This makes it an extremely useful test in case of positivity, but of little use if negative or doubtful, not being able to consider it reliable. To overcome this problem, our study aims to bring an approach based on a physical principle, that is spectroscopy, which is fast non-invasive and does not require the use of additional substances or contrast media in the diagnosis of urothelial neoplasms in samples of urine. In our experience, multimodal optical fiber spectroscopy has proved extremely valid in discriminating healthy urothelial tissue from tumor ex vivo, as well as providing important information on the degree of urothelial neoplasia, with accuracy rates higher than 80%, for which developed the idea of a technique based on multimodal spectroscopy. If our method proves valid, it could improve the follow up and management of patients with urothelial cancer, being able to support normal cytology and provide further support to the cytopathologist, as well as simplify the diagnosis.
This study will investigate the safety and tolerability of SLN124 in patients with Thalassaemia or patients with Very Low- and Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) after single ascending s.c. doses and multiple doses in healthy male and female subjects. Up to 7 cohorts of 56 patients with Thalassaemia and up to 7 cohorts of 56 patients with MDS will be enrolled. Each subject will receive single or multiple doses of SLN124 or placebo given by subcutaneous (s.c) injection.
This study will assess whether switching participants who have benefitted from mepolizumab or benralizumab to GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) is non-inferior to maintaining current treatment on the annualized rate of clinically significant exacerbations in participants with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. Throughout the study, all participants will continue their non-biologic Baseline standard of care (SoC) asthma treatment.
The primary objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy of Tacrolimus gel versus an anti-inflammatory mouthwash in an oral solution for the management of patients suffering from symptomatic OLP. The secondary objective was to analyze which one of the two treatments induced a greater risk of developing side effects.
This feasibility study highlights the features of the 3D dynamic responsive prosthesis ProFlor-E® for fixation free obliteration of inguinal hernia defect
This study will assess the efficacy and safety of GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) as an adjunctive therapy in participants with severe uncontrolled asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype.
The purpose of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Luspatercept compared with placebo in subjects with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated Myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia on concomitant Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor therapy and who require red blood cell count (RBC) transfusions. The study is divided into Screening Period, a Treatment Phase (consisting of a Blinded Core Treatment Period, a Day 169 Response Assessment, a Blinded Extension Treatment Period, and an Open-label Extension Treatment Period), and a Posttreatment Follow-up Period. Following the Day 169 Response Assessment, subjects who did not show clinical benefit will have the option to unblind. Subjects who were on placebo during the Blinded Core Treatment Period will have the opportunity to crossover into the Open-Label Extension Treatment Period and receive Luspatercept.
This is a multicenter open-label randomized study for the early treatment of pneumonia due to SARS-COV2 with transfusion of convalescent plasma. Patients with pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2 will be randomized to receive or not convalescent plasma collected by recovered patients with previous diagnosis of COVID19
A total of 138 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted or open colectomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) were included in the present study. Subjects commonly shared a condition of overweight or obesity. The investigators aimed to define any difference between the two different groups (open vs laparoscopic-assisted surgery) and a series of outcomes, i.e. hospitalization, Lymph nodes number, Intra-Surgery complications, and Clavien Dindo score.