There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tofersen in presymptomatic adult carriers of a superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mutation with elevated neurofilament (NF). The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability tofersen and to evaluate the effect of tofersen on pharmacodynamics (PD)/treatment response biomarkers when initiated prior to versus at the time of emergence of clinically manifest amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Rationale: Histological inflammation of the prostate is a common finding in the results of the histopathological examinations after a prostate biopsy or a transurethral or open prostatectomy. Several studies have investigated the role of prostatic inflammation in the development of prostatic enlargement and pathogenesis of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). Therefore, prostatic inflammation could be a potential treatment target for men with LUTS. Objective: The aim of the study is the development and the validation of a nomogram based on clinical parameters that could predict the presence of prostatic inflammation. Study design: Non-interventional, multicentric, cross-sectional, observational prospective study. Study population: Men, age ≥ 40 yrs, with LUTS who will undergo any prostatic surgery for BPH (Open, laparoscopic, robotic, transurethral resection/enucleation, laser prostatectomy) or TRUS-biopsy according to the standard clinical practice of the participating urologists Intervention: All included males receive standard care for their symptoms according to the physician's practice. For this study, baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are recorded and correlated with the histological outcome. Main study parameters/endpoints: Development and validation of the Prostatic Inflammation Nomogram Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: No additional treatment or intervention related to the study is required. Therefore no negative outcomes are expected as the standard treatment is unchanged. There is no additional burden for the patients.
This is a multicenter, observational, retrospective and prospective study for the evaluation of precision medicine to target frailty of endocrine-metabolic origin, with a genetic study.
PQ-110-005 (BRIGHTEN) is an open-label, dose escalation and double-masked, randomized, controlled study evaluating safety and tolerability of sepofarsen administered via intravitreal (IVT) injection in pediatric subjects (<8 years of age) with LCA10 due to the c.2991+1655A>G mutation over 24 months of treatment.
The aim of this prospecive randomized study is to evaluate the effects of a dose of sugammadex increased by 50% compared to a standard dose on recovery time from deep neuromuscular block in elderly patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Secondary objectives are to evaluate the different extubation time, time to exit from the operating room (OR), lenght of stay in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and safety (hemodynamic parameters and respiratory function).
The newly recognised disease COVID-19 is caused by the Severe-Acute-Respiratory-Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which rapidly spread globally in late 2019, reaching pandemic proportions. The clinical spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infection is broad, encompassing asymptomatic infection, mild upper respiratory tract illness and mild extrapulmonary symptoms, and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure and even death. Given the rising global death toll associated with the pandemic, in the last year we have witnessed a race to find drugs/biological treatments to save the lives of hospitalised, severely ill patients, as well as to develop vaccines. Nonetheless, to limit the number of hospitalisations and deaths due to severe illness, thus avoiding pushing hospitals to their limits and remarkably reducing the tremendous treatment costs for health care providers, it is crucial to also focus on primary care physicians and initial mild symptoms in COVID-19 patients at home. As with other acute viral infections, early initiation of treatment for COVID-19 might improve clinical outcomes. For COVID-19, most primary care physicians have initially treated their patients according to their judgment, with various treatment regimens they believe are most appropriate based on thier experience/expertise. We recently published a note on how we were treating patients at home based on the pathophysiologic and pharmacologic rationale and the available clinical evidence of efficacy in COVID-19 for each of the recommended class of drugs. Because the common early mild symptoms of COVID-19 highlight a systemic inflammatory process, there is the recommendation of using anti-inflammatory agents to limit excessive host inflammatory responses to the viral infection, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids. In a recent academic matched-cohort study, we found that early treatment of COVID-19 patients at home by their family doctors according to the proposed recommendation regimen almost completely prevented the need for hospital admission (the most clinically relevant outcome) due to progression toward more severe illness, compared to patients in the 'control' cohort who were treated at home according to their family physician's assessments. This translated into a reduction of over 90% in the overall numbers of days of hospitalisation and in related treatment costs. Treatment according to the recommended algorithm was safe and well tolerated. However, the rate of hospitalization was a secondary outcome of the study and the possibility of a casual finding cannot be definitely excluded. Thus, we have considered the observed reduction in patient hospitalization an hypothesis generating finding that provides a robust background for the present new cohort study primarily aimed to test the effect on this outcome of COVID-19 treatment at home according to the proposed recommendation algorithm. No randomized clinical trials have been performed so far in COVID-19 patients to compare the effectiveness of different regimens targeting early symptoms at home. Comparative analysis of patient cohorts with long-enough follow-up in everyday clinical practice may offer a good alternative to randomized clinical trials to evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. Thus, we will use this approach to compare a cohort of COVID-19 patients treated at home by their family physicians according to the proposed recommendation algorithm with another cohort of similar COVID-19 patients treated by their family doctors with various treatment regimens they believe most appropriate based on their experience and expertise, and monitored longitudinally up to 3 months. Our working hypothesis is that following the proposed recommendation algorithm the early COVID-19-related inflammatory process is limited, preventing the need of hospital admission at larger extent than with other therapeutic approaches also targeting early symptoms of the illness at home.
For patients with breast cancer subject to a mastectomy, preserving the morphology of the breast with immediate reconstruction is a crucial aspect to preserve the quality of life. There are several types of breast reconstruction: prosthetic in one or two stages and autologous reconstruction. Adjuvant radiotherapy has shown an improvement of the overall survival and of the local control for patients with positive lymph nodes. As a consequence, plastic surgeons come into contact with more patients with a history of irradiation of their breasts than ever before. However, there are few studies with a significant number that evaluate the effect of pre-reconstruction radiotherapy on the three types of reconstruction. The aim of this study is to compare retrospectively these three types of reconstruction techniques to evaluate the impact of breast prior irradiation on the outcome of prosthetic reconstruction.
The goals of this clinical study are to learn about the safety, tolerability, dosing and effectiveness of the study drug, magrolimab in combination with other anticancer therapies in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
Exploratory study of SLPI expression in human prostate cancer patients This is a no-profit exploratory study about the expression of SLPI in human prostate cancer patients that will enroll about 200 patients admitted for suspect prostate cancer to Careggi University Hospital. We will verify whether an increase SLPI levels in the sera may serve as biomarker of cancer progression.
A single-center, randomized controlled study will be conducted in order to compare three Endoscopic Gastroplasty (EG) techniques with a control group of obese patients (BMI 30-44.99 kg/m2) at Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Mater Olbia Hospital, Qatar Foundation Endowment & Gemelli Foundation, Italy in period June 2020 - June 2023, with the aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these procedures.