There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
In Europe, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequent type of cancer in men and the third most lethal. Current clinical practices, often leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent tumors, suffer from lack of precision calling for advanced AI models to go beyond SoA by deciphering non-intuitive, high-level medical image patterns and increase performance in discriminating indolent from aggressive disease, early predicting recurrence and detecting metastases or predicting effectiveness of therapies. To date efforts are fragmented, based on single-institution, size-limited and vendorspecific datasets while available PCa public datasets (e.g. US TCIA) are only few hundred cases making model generalizability impossible. The ProCAncer-I project brings together 20 partners, including PCa centers of reference, world leaders in AI and innovative SMEs, with recognized expertise in their respective domains, with the objective to design, develop and sustain a cloud based, secure European Image Infrastructure with tools and services for data handling. The platform hosts the largest collection of PCa multi-parametric (mp)MRI, anonymized image data worldwide (>17,000 cases), based on data donorship, in line with EU legislation (GDPR). Robust AI models are developed, based on novel ensemble learning methodologies, leading to vendor-specific and -neutral AI models for addressing 8 PCa clinical scenarios. To accelerate clinical translation of PCa AI models, we focus on improving the trust of the solutions with respect to fairness, safety, explainability and reproducibility. Metrics to monitor model performance and a causal explainability functionality are developed to further increase clinical trust and inform on possible failures and errors. A roadmap for AI models certification is defined, interacting with regulatory authorities, thus contributing to a European regulatory roadmap for validating the effectiveness of AI-based models for clinical decision making.
Several micro-RNA plays a key role in endothelial function and may be a link for the known interaction of periodontitis and cardiovascular disease. The investigators compared the impact of gingival health, periodontitis (CP), cardiovascular disease or of both diseases (CP +cardiovascular disease) on gingival crevicular fluid miRNA 7a-5p, miRNA 21-3p, miRNA 21-5p, miRNA 200b-3p, miRNA 200b-5p, miRNA 100-5p, miRNA 125-5p levels.
The aim of this study is to compare Onivyde manufactured at two different production sites in adult participants with advanced cancer in the pancreas. Adult participants with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma will receive Test Product (TP) and Reference Product (RP) Onivyde in line with its approved indication. The order in which they receive them depends on the group to which they are randomly assigned, this will be referred to as the crossover phase. The average study duration for each participant until end of crossover phase is estimated to be approximately 3 months. After completion of the crossover phase, participants who in the opinion of the investigator will benefit from the treatment will be offered to enter the extension phase where they will receive the commercial Onivyde (RP) until disease progression, withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity or death. Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a cancer that has spread (metastasized) beyond the area of the pancreas to other organs of the body. Onivyde is approved for the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after disease progression following gemcitabine-based therapy, in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV).
This Phase 1b/2a study will assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of CyPep-1 when administered directly into measurable tumor lesions in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. Additionally, the study will assess anti-tumor effects of CyPep-1 on injected lesions and non-injected target lesions identified at baseline, as well as local and systemic immunological effects of CyPep-1 in combination with pembrolizumab.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Durvalumab plus Regorafenib versus observation for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer achieving the no evidence of disease state. The NED state can be achieved in any line of treatment and it is defined as: 1. R0 resection for surgery, 2. the complete ablation defect covering the lesion on CT scan for radiofrequency, 3. the erogation of ≥ 60 Gy for stereotactic radiotherapy, 4. complete response to antineoplastic treatments on CT scan. In all these cases CEA and CA 19.9 must be within normal limits at the time of randomization. Participants in this study will receive: Experimental arm: Regorafenib 90 mg d1-21 every 28 days plus Durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days for 1 year Control arm: Observation (crossover to Experimental arm is allowed in case of relapse) Tumor assessment will be performed every 12 weeks.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) between sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in participants with previously untreated, locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer whose tumors do not express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or in participants previously treated with anti-programmed cell death (ligand or protein) 1 (Anti-PD-(L)1) Agents in the early setting whose tumors do express PD-L1.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) between sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) and pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) and pembrolizumab in participants with previously untreated, locally advanced inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, whose tumors express programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).
This study aims to compare indomethacin and the combination of indomethacin and aggressive lactated Ringer infusion in terms of efficacy in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis (PEP).
During bronchodilator tests, it's common to ask patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to take bronchodilator therapy by inhaling after a maximal exhalation, when the respiratory system volume equals the residual volume. The same maneuver is required for the chronic therapy. Nevertheless, in patients with COPD the distribution of ventilation is more heterogeneous, especially when lung volumes are closer to residual volume . It is therefore predictable that the distribution of air volume containing bronchodilator that has been inhaled at residual volume is more heterogeneous than at higher volumes, such as at functional residual capacity. Accordingly, the bronchodilator can be preferentially distributed in more open airways than in less patent ones, with a heterogeneous distribution of the medication. Therefore, the overall bronchodilation should be greater when the drug inhalation is performed at functional residual capacity than at residual volume. It is common knowledge that the effectiveness of bronchodilator therapy with pMDI in subjects with COPD is greatly affected by the inhalation technique, which can be difficult to perform for many patients. Therefore, in addition to the possibility that inhalation of bronchilation therapy at residual volume could lower the drug effectiveness, this maneuver complicates the sequence of actions required to the patient, enhancing the risk of errors and decreasing the aderence to treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the inhalation of a bronchodilator at different lung volumes can affect its effectiveness in terms of respiratory function, in patients with COPD. Assuming that the bronchodilator effectiveness is equal or greater when inhaled at functional residual capacity rather than at residual volume, the inhalation maneuver can be simplified for patients with COPD.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nipocalimab versus placebo in participants with active idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).