There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multi-center, Phase 3 study of GLSI-100 immunotherapy in HLA-A*02 positive and HER2/neu positive subjects who are at high risk for disease recurrence and have completed both neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant standard of care therapy. Treatment consists of 6 intradermal injections, Primary Immunization Series (PIS), over the first 6 months of treatment and 5 booster intradermal injections spaced 6 months apart. A third open-label arm will explore GLSI-100 immunotherapy in non-HLA-A*02 positive and HER2/neu positive subjects.
The main goal of this project is to study and define a rehabilitative flow-chart for athletes' rehabilitation and return to sport made by a set of objective shoulder evaluation indicators that are easy to use in clinical context. Enrolled patients will undergo supervised rehabilitation treatment for rotator cuff repair according to a standardized protocol (5 days/week) and will undergo four evaluation at different times. Healthy subjects will undergo evaluations with the same timing as patients.
The purpose of this study is to provide real-world data useful to address the factors associated to the administration of oral anticoagulants in the elderly population affected by non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), in Italy, and it's persistence rate after one year.
This study presents a digital mental-health protocol designed to offer remote, personalized support to former or current COVID-19 patients. A total of 100 subjects will be enrolled. Participation is voluntary, and an extended informed-consent form is signed before any evaluation, assessment or voice/video call. Consent forms are collected remotely for those who have been discharged and are currently in remission and in-person for subjects hospitalized in a COVID-19-ward of either pneumology, internal medicine or infectious disease departments. Efforts will be made to assess all participants who have completed the minimum required intervention activities: for DigiCOVID, minimum required intervention activities include attending psychotherapy sessions at least 4 times. As the main goal of this project is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and usability of DigiCOVID, the investigators will conduct an analysis of the following primary outcome measures in all ITT participants: 1. Assessment of completion rate. Based on our previous studies, the investigators expect that ≥80% of participants will complete the battery of online self-reports: 2. Usability ratings obtained post-DigiCOVID via a 7-point Likert-scale questionnaire (mean rating of all responses). This is a brief and embedded post-study questionnaire on program satisfaction, clarity, and perceived benefits. Participants will rate each sentence on the following 7-point Likert scale: 1 = Completely Agree; 2 = Mostly Agree; 3 = Somewhat Agree; 4 = Undecided; 5 = Somewhat Disagree; 6 = Mostly Disagree; 7 = Completely Disagree. Based on our previous studies, the investigators hypothesize exit survey ratings of at least ≥4.5 ±1.5 on the 7-point Likert scale items; 3. Reported side effects (raw score). Based on our previous findings, the investigators expect 0 adverse events due to program use; 4. Overall program completion rate. Based on previous findings, the investigators hypothesize full program completion in ≥70% study participants. The secondary outcome measures will be collected at baseline and immediately after the treatment for all participants. The investigators designed DigiCOVID to improve mental wellbeing. Therefore, the investigators will measure the impact of the intervention by looking at pre-post changes in the following outcome measures: the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) (Goldberg, 1988) , the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (Weiss & Marmar, 1997), the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) (Robert L Spitzer et al., 2006), the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) (Morin et al., 2011), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Kroenke et al., 2001). The investigators expect to observe a significant improvement across all these secondary outcome measures in COVID-19 patients. To verify these experimental hypotheses, the investigators will conduct the analysis based on the pre-intervention (baseline) and post-intervention data using parametric and non parametric statistical tests. The criterion for statistical significance is p < 0.05. Results with p < 0.1 will be described as trends.
The DIAMOND AF Post Approval study is a prospective, global, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm observational trial
Investigators will compare two different approaches of postoperative drainage after the standard water-seal drain has been used efficiently; one is by using urine bag and check it get blown by the leaked air, two is by using clamping of the water seal drain. Investigators will compare them depending on several factors such as; cost effectiveness, hospital stay, duration of putting the drain and more, reinsertion of the chest tube and others.
Immunotherapy has become the standard of care in different advanced malignancies. Its effectiveness in the palliative setting was demonstrated by several phase III trials. However, the response rate varies according to the cancer under study and to the line of treatment. A potential way to improve the activity of single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is to enhance the clinical response through further antitumor agents, including radiotherapy. Studies showed that carbon ions may lead to a broader immunogenic response; for their dosimetric characteristics it is possible to reduce integral dose sparing immune cells to direct and sustain a tumor specific immune response. Considering the available preclinical and clinical evidence together, the goal of this study is to explore the feasibility and the clinical activity of adding carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), employed with a fractionation strategy comparable to stereotactic body radiation, to ICIs in advanced malignancies where immunotherapy is currently the standard of care.
This is a dose escalation study involving stage IV breast cancer patients not progressing after 6 months of first line systemic treatment. Potential advantages of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treating breast primary tumor in metastatic breast cancer are: - radio-biological advantage of a short highly effective treatment schedule - possibility of preventing lesions to become symptomatic - possibility of continuing systemic treatment without interruption
Objective: To prospectively evaluate clinical outcomes during guideline-recommended LMWH dose escalation for recurrent VTE during LMWH or DOAC treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis. Study design: International, prospective, observational cohort study Study population: Adult cancer patients with symptomatic or incidental recurrent VTE while receiving LMWH or DOACs for acute VTE are eligible. Main exclusion criteria include anticoagulant treatment for the recurrent VTE for more than 72 hours, severe hepatic dysfunction, active bleeding, recent major surgery, uncontrolled hypertension, known bleeding diathesis, and a life expectancy of less than 1 month. Study procedures: Patients will be managed at the discretion of the treating physician, who will be encouraged to follow guideline recommendations. These guidelines suggest supra-therapeutic dose LMWH for 4 weeks (+/- 5 days) followed by therapeutic dose LMWH or therapeutic dose DOAC, while it is suggested to treat patients with VTE recurrence during maintenance dose LMWH (i.e. 75 to 80% of full therapeutic weight adjusted dose) with therapeutic dose of LMWH or DOAC. Main study parameters/endpoints: The co-primary outcomes are new symptomatic or incidental recurrent VTE during 3 months of follow-up and on-treatment major bleeding. Secondary outcomes include recurrent incidental VTE, recurrent symptomatic VTE, recurrent incidental or symptomatic proximal or distal DVT, recurrent incidental or symptomatic PE, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, all-cause mortality, and cancer-related mortality. VTE occurring at other sites such as cerebral DVT or splanchnic DVT will also be recorded.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health concern because more than 10% of the world's population have it, its prevalence is increasing, and CKD is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality for this population. The majority of the people with CKD aren't aware and there are not available tools for early CKD detection and for an accurate prediction on these patients. Many CKD patients exhibit progressive renal dysfunction, demonstrating a failure of current, non-specific therapeutic strategies. Better methods are urgently needed for i) early diagnosis of CKD, and prediction of its progression for improved stratification of patients and better targeting of current treatments; and ii) to directly assess structural and functional responses of the kidney to new therapies and identify those patients who respond. Over the past decade, renal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has emerged as a promising technique for improved understanding and characterisation of renal pathophysiology. Compared to histopathology, MRI is non-invasive and avoids sampling bias by characterising the entire kidney with high spatial resolution. In spite of a number of single centre studies showing renal MRI feasibility and potential to address a number of key clinical questions, current methodological differences across studies hinder reliable comparisons of the results, which can only be regarded as preliminary. Standardization of acquisition and processing protocols across centres is therefore needed, and this will also lead to the possibility to provide preliminary data of the multiparametric renal MRI clinical validity and utility. The purpose of this study is to standardize, assess the feasibility and provide preliminary evidence of clinical validity and utility of the multiparametric renal MRI. To reach this goal two groups of subjects are involved: - Group 1 (healthy volunteers). In this group the repeatibility and reproducibility of multiparametric renal MRI will be assessed. - Group 2 (CKD patients). In this group the feasibility, the acceptability, the reproducibility and the preliminary clinical validity of multiparametric renal MRI will be assessed.